Journals / The International Journal of Materials and Engineering Technology / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE FAILURE SURFACES OCCURRING BEHIND THE T TYPE CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL

Pages
18–31
Publication Date
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study short heel-long heel cases and effective parameters on the inclination angles of the failure surfaces are explained elaborately.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Determination of lateral earth pressure plays a vital role in retaining wall design.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Numerical analysis was performed using commercially available finite element program Plaxis 2D.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study short heel-long heel cases and effective parameters on the inclination angles of the failure surfaces are explained elaborately.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Inverted T cantilever retaining wall · Failure surface · Short heel

Abstract

Determination of lateral earth pressure plays a vital role in retaining wall design. Failure surfaces are very effective in active lateral earth pressure acting on cantilever retaining walls. Calculations of lateral earth thrusts vary for two different cases, namely short heel or long heel, based on the intersection of T type cantilever wall and failure surface. In this study, the effect of heel length on an active failure mechanism was examined with numerical simulation based on FEM. The results of the numerical analyses were compared with the results of small-scale model tests and an analytical method. In comparison, the inclination angle of active failure surfaces was taken into account. An earth thrust maximization code suggested in the literature was used to determine failure surface inclination angles analytically. In order to determine failure inclination experimentally, results of small scale tests were used. In the tests, failure surfaces were determined using particle image velocimetry technique (PIV). Numerical analysis was performed using commercially available finite element program Plaxis 2D. The same material properties are used in all numerical models. As a result of the study short heel-long heel cases and effective parameters on the inclination angles of the failure surfaces are explained elaborately.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAMİLOĞLU, H. A., YILMAZ, F., ŞADOĞLU, E. (2021). INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE FAILURE SURFACES OCCURRING BEHIND THE T TYPE CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL. The International Journal of Materials and Engineering Technology, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 18–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/806050

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Rahardjo, H., and Fredlund, D.G. General limit equilibrium method for lateral earth force, Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 2011, 21(1):166-175, DOI: 10.1139/t84-013
  2. Kamiloğlu, H. A. and Şadoğlu, E. Experimental and theoretical investigation of short and long heel cases of cantilever retaining walls in active state, Int. J. Geomech., 2019, 19(5): 04019023, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001389
  3. Ouyang, C., Xu, Q., He, S., Luo, Y. and Wu,Y. A generalized limit equilibrium method for the solution of active earth pressure on a retaining wall, Journal of Mountain Science, 2019, 10(6):1018-1027, DOI: 10.1007/s11629-013-2576-x
  4. Cao, W., Liu, T., Xu, Z. Estimation of active earth pressure on inclined retaining wall based on simplified principal stress trajectory method, Int. J. Geomech., 2019, 19(7): 06019011, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001447
  5. Liu, X.R., Xi, O.M., and Yang, X. Upper bound limit analysis of passive earth pressure of cohesive backfill on retaining wall, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 353-356:895-900, DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.353-356.895
  6. Farzaneh, O., Askari, F., and Fatemi, J. Active earth pressure induced by strip loads on a backfill, Int. J. Civ. Eng., 2013, 12(4):281-291
  7. Chen, W.F., and Rosenfarb, J.L. Limit analysis solutions of earth pressure problems. Soils Found., 1973, 13(4): 45-60
  8. Keshavarz, A., and Ebrahimi, M. Axisymmetric active lateral earth pressure for c-Φ soils using the stress characteristics method. Scientia Iranica A. 2017, 24(5): 2332-2345, DOI:10.24200/sci.2017.4155 9. Keshavarz, A., and Ebrahimi, M. The effects of the soil-wall adhesion and friction angle on the active lateral earth pressure of circular retaining walls, Int. J. Civ. Eng. 2016, 14: 97-105,
  9. Kumar, J., and Chitikela, S. Seismic passive earth pressure coefficients using the method of characteristics, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2002, 39(2): 463-471,
  10. Anvar, S.A., and Ghahramani, A. Dynamic active earth pressure against retaining walls, Proceedings: Third International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 2013, St Louis, Missouri, USA
  11. Hu, W., Liu, K., Zhu, X., Tong, X., and Zhou, X. Active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls for finite soils in sloping condition considering shear stress and soil arching effect, Hindawi Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020, https://doi