SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

COMPARISON OF SQUARE AND CIRCULAR SECTIONED WIND TUNNEL PERFORMANCE

İbrahim GÖV
Pages
50–59
Publication Date
2021-10-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hence in this study, turbulence intensity of the square and circular sectioned desktop size wind tunnel is investigated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, square and circular sectioned subsonic wind tunnel performance is examined numerically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analysis of three-dimensional (3D) flow in square and circular sectioned wind tunnel is used for comparison.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hence in this study, turbulence intensity of the square and circular sectioned desktop size wind tunnel is investigated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:CFD · Wind tunnel · Turbulence

Abstract

In this study, square and circular sectioned subsonic wind tunnel performance is examined numerically. The computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analysis of three-dimensional (3D) flow in square and circular sectioned wind tunnel is used for comparison. Experimental studies are very important in designing of a new product. In the aerodynamic designs, wind tunnel tests are commonly used in experimental studies. In the experimental studies accuracy is the most critical point to verify the results. Turbulence intensity is the main drawback of the wind tunnels. Hence in this study, turbulence intensity of the square and circular sectioned desktop size wind tunnel is investigated.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖV, İ. (2021). COMPARISON OF SQUARE AND CIRCULAR SECTIONED WIND TUNNEL PERFORMANCE. The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 50–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/805962

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Applied Acoustics 155 (2019) 358–370 Design and performance of an aeroacoustic wind tunnel facility at the University of Bristol Yannick D. Mayer, Hasan Kamliya Jawahar, Máté Szoke, Syamir Alihan Showkat Ali, Mahdi Azarpeyvand [2] Applied Acoustics 175 (2021) 107847 Design, validation, and benchmark tests of the aeroacoustic wind tunnel in SUSTech Yannian Yang a,b, Yu Liu a,b,⇑, Rui Liu c, Chao Shen a, Pikai Zhang a, Renke Wei a, Xiaomin Liu a, Pengwei Xu [3]Applied Acoustics 170 (2020) 107504 Aeroacoustic design and characterization of the 3D-printed, open-jet, anechoic wind tunnel of Delft University of Technology Roberto Merino-Martínez a,⇑, Alejandro Rubio Carpio a, Lourenço Tércio Lima Pereira a, Steve van Herk b, Francesco Avallone a, Daniele Ragni a, Marios Kotsonis [4] Cryogenics 115 (2021) 103279 System design and experimental verification of an internal insulation panel system for large-scale cryogenic wind tunnel W.C. Niu, Y.L. Ju [5] Aerospace Science and Technology 115 (2021) 106814 Design and characterization of a multifunctional low-speed anechoic wind tunnel at HKUST Wei Yia, Peng Zhoua,∗, Yi Fanga, Jingwen Guoa, Siyang Zhonga, Xin Zhanga, Xun Huangb, Guocheng Zhouc, Bao Chen [6] Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 33 (6) (2019) 2737~2746 Investigation of wind tunnel wall effect and wing-fuselage interference regarding the prediction of wing aerodynamics and its influence on the horizontal tail Ngoc T. B. Hoang* and Binh V. Bui [7] Yi L, Changchuan X, Chao Y, Jialin C. Gust response analysis and wind tunnel test for a high-aspect ratio wing. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 2016
  2. 29(1): 91–103 [8] Koreanschi A, Gabor O S, Acotto J, Brianchon G, Portier G, Botez R M, Mamou M, Mebarki Y. Optimization and design of an aircraft’s morphing wing-tip demonstrator for drag reduction at low speeds, Part II - Experimental validation using Infra-Red transition measurement from Wind Tunnel tests. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 2017
  3. 30(1): 164–174 [9] Joe M, Kammegne T, Botez R M, Grigorie L T, Mamou M, Mebarki Y. Proportional fuzzy feed-forward architecture control validation by wind tunnel tests of a morphing wing. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 2017
  4. 30(2): 561–576 [10] Zhang W, Sun J, Wang L, Wu J, He L. Rotor airfoil aerodynamic design method and wind tunnel test verification. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 2020
  5. 33(8): 2123–2132 [11] Meng Y, Wan Z, Xie C *, An C. Time-domain nonlinear aeroelastic analysis and wind tunnel test of a flexi