SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 11 Issue: 2

A REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANT EMPLOYING ENERGY AND EXERGY ANALYSIS

Lava Shireef(Northern Techincal University)0009-0005-4900-797X
Thamir Ibrahim(Tikrit University)0000-0003-3965-7029
Pari Fareek(Northern techincal university)0009-0005-6162-679X
Aisha Koprulu(northern techincal university)0009-0008-9839-4357
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Energy and exergy analysis is a beneficial mechanism for improving overall efficiency and lowering irreversibility in the power plant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Enhancing the performance of combined cycle power plants (CCPP) requires optimizing the design, operation and plant maintenance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was found that the design of heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) plays a pivotal role in combined cycle power plant (CCPP) performance decreasing waste thermal energy and increasing overall power output a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) with a triple pressure level (TP) minimizes energy losses and increases the efficiency of the power plant.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Energy and exergy analysis is a beneficial mechanism for improving overall efficiency and lowering irreversibility in the power plant.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Combined Cycle Power Plant · Energy analysis · Exergy analysis

Abstract

Enhancing the performance of combined cycle power plants (CCPP) requires optimizing the design, operation and plant maintenance. Energy and exergy analysis is a beneficial mechanism for improving overall efficiency and lowering irreversibility in the power plant. This paper aims to review the thermodynamic analysis includes energy analysis, exergy analysis or energy and exergy analysis of combined power plant. It was found that the design of heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) plays a pivotal role in combined cycle power plant (CCPP) performance decreasing waste thermal energy and increasing overall power output a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) with a triple pressure level (TP) minimizes energy losses and increases the efficiency of the power plant. Exergoeconomic analysis also plays a significant role in enhancing performance and increasing investment in the power plant by optimizing economic costs. Moreover, this review highlighted related problems to facilitate future work and recommendations for enhancing the design of combined cycle power plants (CCPP), which optimizes energy generation and lowers greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate detrimental environmental effects.

🔖

Cite This Article

Shireef, L., Ibrahim, T., Fareek, P., Koprulu, A. (2026). A REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANT EMPLOYING ENERGY AND EXERGY ANALYSIS. The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences, Volume: 11 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1551679

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (105)

  1. Gülen SC. Étude on Gas Turbine Combined Cycle Power Plant: Next 20 Years. In Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air; June 2015; Location. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. p. V003T08A003.
  2. Elwardany M, Nassib AM, Mohamed HA. Analyzing global research trends in combined cycle power plants: a bibliometric study. Energy Nexus 2024; 13: 100265.‏
  3. Horlock J. Combined power plants--Past, present, and future. J Eng Gas turbines power 1995; 117.
  4. Subrahmanyam N, Rajaram S, Kamalanathan N. HRSGs for combined cycle power plants. Heat Recovery Systems and CHP 1995; 15.
  5. Karthikeyan R, Hussain MA, Reddy B, Nag P. Performance simulation of heat recovery steam generators in a cogeneration system. Int J Energy Res 1998, 22: 399-410.
  6. Srinivas T, Gupta A, Reddy B. Thermodynamic modeling and optimization of multi-pressure heat recovery steam generator in combined power cycle. 2008.
  7. Casarosa C, Donatini F, Franco A. Thermoeconomic optimization of heat recovery steam generators operating parameters for combined plants. Energy 2004; 29: 389-414.
  8. Elwardany M, Nassib AM,Mohamed HA. Exergy analysis of a gas turbine cycle power plant: a case study of power plant in Egypt. J Therm Anal Calorim 2024; 149(14): 74337447. ‏
  9. Altarawneh OR, Alsarayreh AA, Ala'a M, Al-Kheetan MJ, Alrwashdeh SS. Energy and exergy analyses for a combined cycle power plant in Jordan. Case Stud Therm Eng 2022; 31:101852.
  10. Kazemi A, Moreno J, Iribarren D. Economic optimization and comparative environmental assessment of natural gas combined cycle power plants with CO2 capture. Energy 2023; 277: 127661.
  11. Franco A, Russo A. Combined cycle plant efficiency increase based on the optimization of the heat recovery steam generator operating parameters. Int J Therm Sci 2002; 41: 843-859.
  12. Balling L, Termuehlen H, Baumgartner R. 40 years of combined cycle power plants. In: International Joint 2002 Power Generation Conference; January 2002; pp. 537-548.
  13. Esfandiari M, Pourfayaz F, Kasaeian A, Gholami A. Energy–exergy analysis for performance improvement of Brayton–Rankine combined cycle system by utilizing a solar absorption refrigeration cycle (case study: Kahnuj Combined Cycle Power Plant). Energy Sci & Eng 2024;12: 201-214.
  14. Abdelrazik AS, Shboul B, Elwardany M, Zohny RN, Osama A.The recent advancements in the building integrated photovoltaic/thermal (BIPV/T) systems: an updated review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2022; 170: 112988.
  15. Khaliq A, Kumar R. Thermodynamic Performance Assessment of Gas Turbine Trigeneration System for Combined Heat Cold and Power Production. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2008;130: 024501.
  16. Fallah M, Siyahi H, Ghiasi R A, Mahmoudi SMS, Yari M, Rosen MA. Comparison of different gas turbine cycles and advanced exergy analysis of the most effective. Energy 2016; 116: 701-715.
  17. Chen J, Chen L, Zang J, Huang Y. Design Comparison for the Supercritical CO2 Brayton Cycle with Recompression and Thermal Regeneration: Numerical Results. Springer 2024; 315–332.
  18. Sayyaadi H, Mehrabipour R. Efficiency enhancement of a gas turbine cycle using an optimized tubular recuperative heat exchanger. Energy 2012; 38: 362-375.
  19. Wang X, Zhang L, Zhu Z. Performance Improvement Overview of the Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycle. Processes 2023;11(9):2795.
  20. Arora G, Singh O. Thermodynamic Study of Environment Friendly Air / Steam Combined Cycle. J Energy Environ Sustainability 2019;7: 52–58.
  21. Wu Z, Xu G, Ge S, Yang Z, Xue X, ChenH. An efficient methanol pre-reforming gas turbine combined cycle with integration of mid-temperature energy upgradation and CO2 recovery: Thermodynamic and economic analysis. Appl Energy 2024.
  22. Lian Z, Qi Y, Huang D. Thermodynamic analysis of combined cycle system based on supercritical CO2 cycle and gas turbine with reheat and recuperation. Energy Sources Part A-Recovery Util Environ Effects 2023; 45(1): 1443–1463.
  23. Datta A, Ganguly R, Sarkar L. Energy and exergy analyses of an externally fired gas turbine (EFGT) cycle integrated with biomass gasifier for distributed power generation. Energy 2010; 35(1): 341-350.
  24. Khaliq A. Exergy analysis of gas turbine trigeneration system for combined production of power heat and refrigeration. Int J Refrig 2009; 32(3): 534 545.
  25. Eke M N, Okoroigwe EC, Umeh SI, Okonkwo P. Performance improvement of a gas turbine power plant in Nigeria by exergy analysis: a case of Geregu 1. Open Access Libr J 2020; 7(9): 1-20.
  26. Oh SD, Pang HS, Kim SM, Kwak HY. Exergy analysis for a gas turbine cogeneration system. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 1996; 118(4): 782-791.
  27. Elwardany M, Nassib AM, Mohamed HA. Exergy analysis of a gas turbine cycle power plant: a case study of power plant in Egypt. J Therm Anal Calorim 2024; 149(14): 7433-7447.
  28. Shamoushaki M, Ghanatir F, Ehyaei MA, Ahmadi A. Exergy and exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimisation of gas turbine power plant by evolutionary algorithms. Case study: Aliabad Katoul power plant. Int J Exergy 2017; 22(3): 279-307.
  29. Starfelt F, Yan J. Case study of energy systems with gas turbine cogeneration technology for an eco‐industrial park. Int J Energy Res 2008; 32(12): 1128-1135.
  30. Soltani S, Mahmoudi SMS, Yari M, Rosen MA. Thermodynamic analyses of an externally fired gas turbine combined cycle integrated with a biomass gasification plant. Energy convers manag 2013; 70: 107-115.
  31. Prina MG, Fanali L, Manzolini G, Moser D, Sparber W. Incorporating combined cycle gas turbine flexibility constraints and additional costs into the EPLANopt model: The Italian case study. Energy 2018; 160: 33-43.
  32. Martin A, Miswandi M, Prayitno A, Kurniawan I, Romy R. Exergy Analysis Of Gas Turbine Power Plant 20 Mw In Pekanbaru-Indonesia. Int J Technol 2016; 7(5): 921.
  33. Costa VAF. ENERGY-EXERGY diagrams for states and energy and exergy balance equations representation. Energy 2021; 218: 119506.
  34. Kapooria RK, Kumar S, Kasana KS. An analysis of a thermal power plant working on a Rankine cycle: A theoretical investigation. J Energy South Afr 2008; 19(1): 77-83.
  35. Elahifar S, Assareh E, Nedaei M. Exergy analysis and optimization of the Rankine cycle in steam power plants using the firefly algorithm. Mech Ind 2018; 19(5): 505.
  36. Karakurt AS, Gunes U. Performance analysis of a steam turbine power plant at part load conditions. J Therm Eng 2017; 3(2): 1121-1128.
  37. Lavrenchenko GK, Slynko AG, Boychuk AS, Halkin VM, Kozlovskyi SV. Improved thermodynamic cycle of a steam turbine plant. J Chem Technol 2023; 31(1): 178-185.
  38. Mrzljak V, Jelić M, Poljak I, Prpić-Oršić J. Analysis and comparison of main steam turbines from four different thermal power plants. Pomorstvo 2023; 37(1):58-74.
  39. Reddy AS, Ahmed MI, Kumar TS, Reddy AVK, Bharathi VP. Analysis of steam turbines. Int Refereed J Eng Sci 2014; 3(2): 32-48.
  40. Rashad A, El Maihy A. Energy and exergy analysis of a steam power plant in Egypt. In: 13th Int Conference on Aerospace Sciences & Aviation Technology; May 2009.
  41. Ray TK, Ganguly R, Gupta A. Exergy analysis for performance optimization of a steam turbine cycle. In: 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society Conference and Exposition in Africa-Power Africa; July2007. pp. 1-8.
  42. Bensenouci A, Medjelled A. Thermodynamic and efficiency analysis of solar steam power plant cycle. Int J Renew Energy Res 2016; 6(4): 1556-1564.
  43. Dincer I, Al‐Muslim H. Thermodynamic analysis of reheat cycle steam power plants. Int J Energy Res 2001; 25(8): 727-739.
  44. Ameri M, Ahmadi P, Hamidi A. Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a steam power plant: A case study. Int J energy res2009; 33(5): 499-512.
  45. Aljundi IH. Energy and exergy analysis of a steam power plant in Jordan. Appl therm eng 2009; 29(2-3): 324-328.
  46. Al-Taha WH, Osman HA. Performance analysis of a steam power plant: A case study. In: MATEC Web Conf; 2018. p. 05023. EDP Sciences.
  47. Ahmadi GR, Toghraie D. Energy and exergy analysis of Montazeri steam power plant in Iran. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2016; 56: 454-463.
  48. Tontu M, Bilgili M, Sahin B. Performance analysis of an industrial steam power plant with varying loads. Int J Exergy 2018; 27(2): 231-250.
  49. Zueco J, López-Asensio D, Fernández FJ, López-González LM. Exergy analysis of a steam-turbine power plant using thermocombustion. Appl Therm Eng 2020; 180: 115812.
  50. Mitrović D, Zivkovic D, Laković MS. Energy and exergy analysis of a 348.5 MW steam power plant. Energy Sources Part A- Recovery Util Environ Effects 2010; 32(11): 1016-1027.
  51. Cengel YA, Boles MA. Thermodynamics: an engineering approach. Sea 2002; 1000(8862): 287-93.
  52. Param HK, Jianu OA. Exergy analysis of heat recovery steam generator: effects of supplementary firing and desuperheater. ASME J Energy Resour Technol 2020;142(5): 050908.
  53. Osueke CO, Onokwai AO, Adeoye AO. Energy and exergy analysis of a 75 MW steam power plant in Sapele (NIGERIA). Int J Innov Res in Adv Eng 2015; 2(6).
  54. Pattanayak L, Sahu JN, Mohanty P. Combined cycle power plant performance evaluation using exergy and energy analysis. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 2017; 36(4): 1180-1186.
  55. Ahmed A, Esmaeil KK, Irfan MA, Al-Mufadi FA. Design methodology of heat recovery steam generator in electric utility for waste heat recovery. Int J Low-Carbon Technol 2018; 13(4): 369-379.
  56. Tontu M, Sahin B, Bilgili M. Using energy and exergy analysis to compare different coal-fired power plants. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery Util Environ Effects 2024; 46(1): 4314-4329.
  57. Qureshy AM, Dincer I. Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated renewable energy system for hydrogen production. Energy 2020; 204: 117945.
  58. Benabdellah HM, Ghenaiet A. Energy, exergy, and economic analysis of an integrated solar combined cycle power plant. Eng Rep 2021; 3(11): e12404.
  59. Shamet O, Ahmed R, Nasreldin Abdalla K. Energy and exergy analysis of a steam power plant in Sudan. Afr J Eng Technol 2021; 1(1).
  60. Shireef LT, Ibrahim TK. Influence of operating parameters on the performance of combined cycle based on exergy analysis. Case Stud Therm Eng 2022; 40: 102506.
  61. Rezaei RA. Energy and exergy evaluation of a dual fuel combined cycle power plant: An optimization case study of the Khoy plant. Power Eng Eng Thermophys 2023; 2(2): 97-109.
  62. Khan MS, Xuebing P, Yuntao S, Bin G,Imran M. An optimization of efficient combined cycle power generation system for fusion power reactor. Case Stud Therm Eng 2024; 57:104344.
  63. Setyanto A,Putra ABK. Energy Auditing at Block 1 Muara Karang Combined Cycle Power Plant. IPTEK J Eng 2019; 4(3): 38-43.
  64. Babaelahi M, Mofidipour E, Rafat E. Combined Energy-Exergy-Control (CEEC) analysis and multi-objective optimization of parabolic trough solar collector powered steam power plant. Energy 2020; 201: 117641.
  65. Asadi S, Mohammadagha M, Naeini HK. Comprehensive Review of Analytical and Numerical Approaches in Earth-to-Air Heat Exchangers and Exergoeconomic Evaluations. arXiv preprint arXiv 2025; 2502:08553.
  66. Lazzaretto A, Tsatsaronis G. SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems. Energy 2006; 31(8-9): 1257-1289.
  67. Tsatsaronis G, Park MH. On avoidable and unavoidable exergy destructions and investment costs in thermal systems. Energy convers manag 2002; 43(9-12): 1259-1270.
  68. Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M. Thermal Design and Optimization. NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1996.
  69. Tsatsaronis G. Definitions and nomenclature in exergy analysis and exergoeconomics. Energy 2007; 32(4): 249-253.
  70. Ahmadi P, Dincer I. Thermodynamic and exergoenvironmental analyses, and multi-objective optimization of a gas turbine power plant. Appl Therm Eng 2011; 31(14-15): 2529-2540.
  71. Tsatsaronis G, Moran MJ. Exergy-aided cost minimization. Energy Convers Manag 1997; 38(15-17): 1535-1542.
  72. Galal M, Abd El Maksoud R, Bayomi NN. Exergoeconomic analysis of a steam turbine power plant in a sulfuric acid factory. Results Eng 2024; 24:103330.
  73. Javadi MA, Hoseinzadeh S, Ghasemiasl R, Heyns PS, Chamkha AJ. Sensitivity analysis of combined cycle parameters on exergy, economic, and environmental of a power plant. J Therm Anal Calorim 2020; 139: 519-525.
  74. Jiawei LÜ, Zhaoyi HUO, Feng LIU, Ning XIE, Wenjing WANG. Advanced Exergoeconomics Analysis of Gas-Steam Combined Cycle Power Generation System. Power Gener Technol 2024; 45(5):941.
  75. Blumberg T, Assar M, Morosuk T, Tsatsaronis G. Comparative exergoeconomic evaluation of the latest generation of combined-cycle power plants. Energy Convers Manag 2017; 153: 616-626.
  76. Alfaris A, Akroot A, Alqaed S, Almehmadi FA. Performance analysis of integrated solar and natural gas combined cycle power plants in high solar potential regions. Sci Rep 2025; 15(1):9181.
  77. Cavalcanti EJC. Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated solar combined cycle system. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017; 67: 507-519.
  78. Sahin AZ, Al-Sharafi A, Yilbas BS, Khaliq A. Overall performance assessment of a combined cycle power plant: an exergo-economic analysis. Energy Convers Manag 2016; 116: 91-100.
  79. Tomlinson LO, McCullough S. Single-shaft combined-cycle power generation system. GER-3767C. Schenectady, NY, USA: GE Power Systems;1996.
  80. Islam M, Hasanuzzaman M, Pandey A, Rahim N. Modern energy conversion technologies. Energy sustain Dev 2020; pp. 19-39.
  81. Zohuri B, Zohuri B. Gas Turbine Working Principles. In: Combined Cycle Driven Efficiency for Next Generation Nuclear Power Plants: An Innovative Design Approach. 2015. pp. 147-171.
  82. Zohuri B, McDaniel PJ, De Oliveira, CR. Advanced nuclear open Air-Brayton cycles for highly efficient power conversion. Nucl Technol 2015;192(1): 48-60.
  83. Hasan N, Rai JN, Arora BB. Optimization of CCGT power plant and performance analysis using MATLAB/Simulink with actual operational data. Springer Plus 2014; 3: 1-9.
  84. Nayak L, Mahto D. Parametric analysis of combined cycle power plant using inlet vapour compression cycle. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 2014.
  85. Nayak LJ, Mahto D. Performance Improvement of Combined Cycle (Dual Pressure HRSG) Using Mechanical Refrigeration System. Int J Appl Eng Res 2014; 23: 22539-22550.
  86. Shin J, Jeon Y, Maeng D, Kim J, Ro S. Analysis of the dynamic characteristics of a combined-cycle power plant. Energy 2002; 27(12):1085-1098.
  87. Enadi N, Roshandel K. Thermodynamic modeling and parametric study and exergy optimization of single, dual and triple pressure combined cycle power plants (CCPP). In: 2011 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks; 2011.
  88. Rashid K. "Integrating Machine Learning and CFD for Enhanced Trailing Edge Serration Design on a NACA 0012 Wind Turbine Blade." International Journal of Thermofluids, vol. 30, 2025, p. 101446
  89. Ordys AW, Grimble MJ, Kocaarslan İ. Combined cycle and combined heat and power processes. Control Syst Robot Autom 2004; 18.
  90. Abadie LM, Chamorro JM. Valuing flexibility: the case of an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant. Energy Econ 2008; 30(4): 1850-1881.
  91. Kaviri AG, Jaafar MNM, Lazim, TM. Modeling and multi-objective exergy based optimization of a combined cycle power plant using a genetic algorithm. Energy Convers Manag 2012; 58: 94-103.
  92. Khanmohammadi S, Azimian AR. Exergoeconomic evaluation of a two-pressure level fired combined-cycle power plant. J Energy Eng 2015; 141(3): 04014014.
  93. Ersayin E, Ozgener L. Performance analysis of combined cycle power plants: A case study. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015; 43: 832-842.
  94. Sue DC, Chuang CC. Engineering design and exergy analyses for combustion gas turbine based power generation system. Energy 2004; 29(8): 1183-1205.
  95. Almutairi A, Pilidis P, Al-Mutawa N. Energetic and exergetic analysis of combined cycle power plant: Part-1 operation and performance. Energies 2015; 8(12): 14118-14135.
  96. Srinivas T, Gupta A, Reddy B, Nag P. Parametric analysis of a coal based combined cycle power plant. Int J Energy Res 2006; 30(1): 19-36.
  97. Kim J, Kim T, Sohn J, Ro S. Comparative analysis of off-design performance characteristics of single and two-shaft industrial gas turbines. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2003; 125(4): 954-960.
  98. Kumar NR, Jaheeruddin S, Krishna KR, Raju ASR. Parametric analysis of triple pressure HRSG in combined cycle power plant. Int Energy J 2006; 7(3).
  99. Elmorsy L, Morosuk T, Tsatsaronis, G. Exergy-based analysis and optimization of an integrated solar combined-cycle power plant. Entropy 2020; 22(6): 655.
  100. Javadi MA, Khalaji M, Ghasemiasl R. Exergoeconomic and environmental analysis of a combined power and water desalination plant with parabolic solar collector. Desalination Water Treat 2020; 193:212-223.
  101. Cavalcanti EJC. Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated solar combined cycle system. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017; 67: 507-519.
  102. Nourpour M, Khoshgoftar Manesh MH, Pirozfar A, Delpisheh M. Exergy, exergoeconomic, exergoenvironmental, emergy-based assessment and advanced exergy-based analysis of an integrated solar combined cycle power plant. Energy Environ 2023; 34(2): 379-406.
  103. Erbaş O. Entegre güneş kombi̇ne çevri̇m santrali̇ni̇n yapisi ve enerji̇ üreti̇mi̇ni̇n değerlendi̇ri̇lmesi̇. Kırklareli univ j Eng sci 2022; 8(1): 136–147.
  104. Onokwai AO, Akuru UB, Ihenacho G, Desai DA, Yakub B, Olawale O, Dada T. A Comprehensive Review of Gas Power Plant Efficiency Using Energy and Exergy Analysis with Renewable Energy Integration. NIPES JSTR Spec Issue 2025; 7(1): 1007-1028.
  105. Tomlinson LO, McCullough S. Single-shaft combined-cycle power generation system. GER-3767C. Schenectady, NY, USA: GE Power Systems;1996.