Journals / TESAM Akademi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Social Identity And Social Conflicts

Sosyal Kimlik ve Sosyal Çatışmalar

Pages
137–151
Publication Date
2014-08-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is stressed that research is especially needed on the issue of how and under what conditions in-group favoritism and out-group discrimination manifest themselves in overt conflicts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This work provides an analytical discussion for inter-group conflicts within the framework of social identity phenomenon, which is a rather neglected dimension of social conflict.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Based on a vast review of social identity literature, the article emphasizes that the perspective of social identity offers a useful tool for understanding and explaining many social-psychological aspects of social conflicts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is stressed that research is especially needed on the issue of how and under what conditions in-group favoritism and out-group discrimination manifest themselves in overt conflicts.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal Kimlik · Sosyal Çatışma · Çatışma

Abstract

This work provides an analytical discussion for inter-group conflicts within the framework of social identity phenomenon, which is a rather neglected dimension of social conflict. Based on a vast review of social identity literature, the article emphasizes that the perspective of social identity offers a useful tool for understanding and explaining many social-psychological aspects of social conflicts. By itself, however, it may be inadequate to capture the complexity of inter-group relations. It is stressed that research is especially needed on the issue of how and under what conditions in-group favoritism and out-group discrimination manifest themselves in overt conflicts.

Özet

Bu çalışma, sosyal kimlik ile sosyal çatışma arasındaki bağa değinen ve sosyal kimlik olgusunu bir gruplar arası çatışma kaynağı olarak değerlendiren analitik bir tartışma sunmaktadır. Bu yönü itibariyle çalışma, sosyal çatışmaların çok irdelenmeyen bir yönüne de dikkat çekmektedir. Sosyal kimlik üzerine detaylı bir literatür araştırmasına dayanan eser, sosyal kimliğin gruplar arası çatışmaların sosyo-psikolojik boyutlarını anlamamıza ve açıklamamıza yardımcı olan önemli bir perspektif olduğu sonucuna ulaşmaktadır. Bununla birlikte bu yaklaşımın gruplar arası uyuşmazlıkları tek başına açıklayamayacağı, özellikle hangi koşullar altında grup kayırmacılığının açık çatışmalara yol açtığının araştırılması gerektiği ifade edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, M. E. (2014). Social Identity And Social Conflicts. TESAM Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 137–151. https://ajindex.com/articles/805948

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Allport, G. (1954),
  2. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley. Appley, H. M. (1991), “Motivation, Equilibration, and Stress: Perspectives on Motivations”, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 38, 114-125.
  3. Barlett, F. C. (1932), Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Brewer, M. B. (2001),
  5. Social Identity, Inter-group Conflict, and Conflict Resolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Brickman, P. and Bulman, R. (1977), Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Press.
  7. Cofer, C. N. and Appley, M. H. (1964), Motivation: Theory and Research. New York: Wiley. Cooley, C. H. (1962), Social Organizations: A Study of the Larger Mind. New Yok: Schocken. Festinger, L. (1954), “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes”, Human Relations, 7, 1171 ______. (1957), A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  8. Gegas, V. and Schwalbe, M. L. (1983), “Beyond the Looking-glass Self: Social Structure and Efficacy-based Self Esteem”, Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 77-88.
  9. Goethals, G. R. and Darley, J. M. (1987), Theories of Group Behavior. New York: SpringerVerlag. Hogg, M. A. and Mcgarty, C. (1990), Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Hogg, M. A. (1993), “Group Cohesiveness: A Critical Review and Some New Directions”, European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 85-111.
  10. Hogg, M. A. and Abrams, D. (1993), Group Motivation. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Jenkins, R. (1996), Social Identity. London and New York: Routledge. Mann, L. (1961), “The Baiting Crowd in Episodes of Threatened Suicide”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 703-709.
  11. Mead, G. H. (1934),
  12. Mind, Self and Society From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  13. Oakes, P. J. (1994), Stereotyping and Social Reality. Oxford: Blackwell. Pryor, J. B. and Ostrom, T. M. (1987), Social Cognition Theory: Theories of Group Behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag. Reykowski, J. (1982), “Social Motivation”, Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 123-154.
  14. Sherif, M. (1967), Group Conflict and Cooperation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Synder, M. (1981), Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Tajfel, H. (1959), “Quantitative Judgment in Social Perception”, British Journal of Psychology, 50, 16-29. ______. (1959). “Stereotypes”, Race, 5, 3-14. ______. (1970). Experiments in inter-group discrimination, Scie