Journals / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

BIST 30 Spot ve Futures Piyasalarında Güniçi Fiyat Keşfi ve Volatilite Yayılımı

BIST 30 SPOT VE FUTURES PİYASALARINDA GÜNİÇİ FİYAT KEŞFİ VE VOLATİLİTE YAYILIMI

Pages
109–133
Publication Date
2014-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to Johansen cointegration test result it is concluded that there is a long-term relationship between index futures and spot markets and according to VECM model result the evidence is found that index futures market contributes more to price discovery and futures prices lead spot prices, and also according to VEC granger causality-block exogeneity test result although there is a two way causality between markets, the causality is much more stronger from index futures to spot market is evidenced.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, price discovery and granger causality relationship in BIST 30 spot and futures markets and also volatility spillover between these markets are examined using intraday 1 minute data for January 2, 2010 – May18, 2012 period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the context of volatility spillover between index futures and spot markets, VECMGARCH(1,1)-BEKK model is applied, and the evidence is found that although there is a bi-directional volatility spillover between index futures and spot markets, the spillover of index futures market shocks and volatility to spot market volatility is much more pronounced.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to Johansen cointegration test result it is concluded that there is a long-term relationship between index futures and spot markets and according to VECM model result the evidence is found that index futures market contributes more to price discovery and futures prices lead spot prices, and also according to VEC granger causality-block exogeneity test result although there is a two way causality between markets, the causality is much more stronger from index futures to spot market is evidenced.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Fiyat Keşfi · Volatilite Yayılımı · Eşbütünleşme

Abstract

In this study, price discovery and granger causality relationship in BIST 30 spot and futures markets and also volatility spillover between these markets are examined using intraday 1 minute data for January 2, 2010 – May18, 2012 period. According to Johansen cointegration test result it is concluded that there is a long-term relationship between index futures and spot markets and according to VECM model result the evidence is found that index futures market contributes more to price discovery and futures prices lead spot prices, and also according to VEC granger causality-block exogeneity test result although there is a two way causality between markets, the causality is much more stronger from index futures to spot market is evidenced. In the context of volatility spillover between index futures and spot markets, VECMGARCH(1,1)-BEKK model is applied, and the evidence is found that although there is a bi-directional volatility spillover between index futures and spot markets, the spillover of index futures market shocks and volatility to spot market volatility is much more pronounced. Hence, the findings for both price discovery and volatility spillover indicate that the information is primarily reflected in the futures market and index futures market is more informationally efficient than spot market

Özet

Bu çalışmada, BIST 30 spot ve futures piyasalarında fiyat keşfi ve granger nedensellik ilişkisi ile ayrıca bu piyasalar arasındaki volatilite yayılımı, 2 Ocak 2010-18 Mayıs 2012 dönemi için gün içi 1 dakika frekanslı veriler kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Johansen eşbütünleşme testi sonucuna göre endeks futures ve spot piyasalar arasında uzun dönemli bir ilişki olduğu sonucuna erişilmiş, VECM modeli sonucuna göre ise endeks futures piyasanın fiyat keşfine daha büyük bir katkı sağladığı ve futures fiyatların spot fiyatları öncüllediği bulgusuna ulaşılmış, ayrıca VEC granger nedensellik-blok dışsallık testi sonucuna göre ise piyasalar arasında iki yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi olmasına rağmen endeks futures piyasadan spot piyasaya doğru olan nedenselliğin çok daha güçlü olduğu kanıtlanmıştır. Endeks futures ve spot piyasalar arasındaki volatilite yayılımı bağlamında ise VECM-GARCH(1,1)-BEKK modeli uygulanmış ve endeks futures ve spot piyasa volatiliteleri arasında iki yönlü bir yayılım olmasına rağmen endeks futures piyasa şokları ve volatilitesinin spot piyasa volatilitesi üzerine yayılımının çok daha belirgin olduğu bulgusuna erişilmiştir. Dolayısıyla, hem fiyat keşfi hem de volatilite yayılımına dair elde edilen bulgular neticesi, bilginin öncelikle futures piyasaya yansıdığı ve endeks futures piyasanın bilgisel olarak spot piyasadan daha etkin olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖK, Y. Y., KALAYCI, P. (2014). BIST 30 Spot ve Futures Piyasalarında Güniçi Fiyat Keşfi ve Volatilite Yayılımı. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 109–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/803450

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ABHYANKAR, A. H. (1995). Return and Volatility Dynamics in the FT-SE 100 Stock Index and Stock Index Futures Markets. The Journal of Futures Markets, 15(4): 457-488.
  2. ABUK, N. (2011). The Intraday Lead-Lag Relationship of Spot and Futures Markets in Turkey: Co-Integration and Causality Analyses (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). ODTÜ, Ankara.
  3. ANDERSEN, T. G., BOLLERSLEV, T., DIEBOLD, F. X. & Labys, P. (2003). Modelling and Forecasting Realized Volatility. Econometrica, 71(2): 579-625.
  4. ANTONIOU, A., & HOLMES, P. (1996).
  5. Futures Market Efficiency, The Unbiasedness Hypothesis and Variance-bound Tests: The Case of the FTSE-100 Futures Contract. Bulletin of Economic Research, 48(2): 115-128.
  6. ARSHANAPALLI, B., & DOUKAS, J. (1994). Common Volatility in S&P 500 Stock Index and S&P 500 Index Futures Prices during October 1987. The Journal of Futures Markets, 14(8): 915-925.
  7. ATEŞ, A., & WANG, G. H. (2005). Information Transmission in Electronic Versus Open‐Outcry Trading Systems: An Analysis of U.S. Equity Index Futures Markets. The Journal of Futures Markets, 25(7): 679-715.
  8. BAUWENS, L., LAURENT, S., & ROMBOUTS, J. V. (2006). Multivariate GARCH Models: A Survey. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21(1): 79–109.
  9. BHAR, R. (2001). Return and Volatility Dynamics in the Spot and Futures Markets in Australia: An Intervention Analysis in a Bivariate EGARCH‐X Framework. Journal of Futures Markets, 21(9): 833 - 850. BOHL, M. T., SALM, C. A., & WILFLING, B. (2011). Do Individual Index Futures Investors Destabilize the Underlying Spot Market? Journal of Futures Markets, 31(1): 81-101.
  10. BOLLERSLEV, T., ENGLE, R. F., & WOOLDRIDGE, J. M. (1988). A Capital Asset Pricing Model with Time-Varying Covariances. Journal of Political Economy, 96(1): 116-131.
  11. BOOTH, G. G., & SO, R. W. (2003). Intraday Volatility Spillovers in the German Equity Index Derivatives Markets. Applied Financial Economics, 13(7): 487–494.
  12. BORSA İSTANBUL. (2014). http://www.borsaistanbul.com/veriler/verileralt/vadeli-islem- ve-opsiyon-piyasasi-verileri, (Erişim: 28.08.2014).
  13. BOSE, S. (2007). Understanding the Volatility Characteristics and Transmission Effects in the Indian Stock Index and Index Futures Market. ICRA Bulletin on Money & Finance, September: 139-162.
  14. BROOKS, C., REW, A. G., & RITSON, S. (2001). A Trading Strategy Based on the Lead- Lag Relationship between the Spot Index and Futures Contract for the FTSE 100. International Journal of Forecasting, 17(1): 31-44.
  15. CHAN, K., CHAN, K. C., & KAROLYI, G. A. (1991). Intraday