Journals / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4

FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN TURKEY

TÜRKİYE’DE DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIM VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME

Pages
1181–1194
Publication Date
2019-10-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the FDI is not crucial for the economic growth in Turkey, there is a positive relationship but there is no causality between FDI and the Turkish economic growth.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has been considered as an important active driver of the economic growth for the host country, notably for the emerging ones.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper consists in examining the relationship between the economic growth and FDI in Turkey (1984-2017) with including aggregate variables that present two pillars of Governance Indicators: ‘control of corruption’ and ‘rule of law’.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the FDI is not crucial for the economic growth in Turkey, there is a positive relationship but there is no causality between FDI and the Turkish economic growth.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım · Ekonomik Büyüme · Nedensellik

Abstract

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has been considered as an important active driver of the economic growth for the host country, notably for the emerging ones. Although large research studies have investigated the determinants of FDI, governance indicators still not highly covered as some experts considered that quantifying such factors is not evident. This paper consists in examining the relationship between the economic growth and FDI in Turkey (1984-2017) with including aggregate variables that present two pillars of Governance Indicators: ‘control of corruption’ and ‘rule of law’. The results showed that the FDI is not crucial for the economic growth in Turkey, there is a positive relationship but there is no causality between FDI and the Turkish economic growth. Also, control of corruption and rule of law don’t have significant impact on the growth in Turkey

Özet

Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım (DYY), başta gelişmekte olan ülkeler olmak üzere, ev sahibi ülke için ekonomik büyümenin önemli bir aktif itici gücü olarak kabul edilmektedir. Çoğu araştırma, doğrudan yabancı yatırımların göstergelerini incelemiş olsa da, bazı faktörlerin belirlenmesinin açık olmadığı kanaatine varılan yönetişim göstergeleri hala yüksek oranda ele alınmamıştır. Bu makale, Türkiye'deki ekonomik büyüme ile DYY arasındaki ilişkiyi inceleyerek (1984-2017), Yönetişim Göstergelerinin iki ayağını temsil eden ‘yolsuzluğun kontrolü’ ve ‘hukukun rolü’ değişkenlerini dahil etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Sonuçlar, DYY'nin Türkiye'deki ekonomik büyüme için çok önemli olmadığını göstermektedir. Ancak DYY ile Türkiye’deki ekonomik büyüme arasında bir nedensellik yoktur. Ayrıca yolsuzluğun kontrolü ve hukukun rolü değişkenleri de Türkiye’deki ekonomik büyüme üzerinde önemli bir etkiye sahip değildir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BENGHOUL, M., AYDIN, H. İ. (2019). FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN TURKEY. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4, 1181–1194. https://ajindex.com/articles/802964

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. AJMI, A.N., EL-MONTASSER, G. and NGUYEN, D.K. (2013). Testing the relationships between energy consumption and income in G7 countries with nonlinear causality tests. Economic Modelling, 35, 126-133.
  2. ALMFRAJIA, M.A. and ALMSAFIR, M.K. (2013). Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth Literature Review from 1994 to 2012. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 206 – 213. AMAL, M., TOMIO, B. and RABOCH, H. (2010). Determinants of foreign direct investment in Latin America. Journal of Globalization. Competitiveness and Governability, 4(3), 116-133.
  3. AYAYDIN, H. (2010). Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: Türkiye Örneği, Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, 26(1), 133-145. BJØRNLAND, H. C. (2000).
  4. VAR Models in Macroeconomic, Research. Statistics Norway Research Department. BOSWORTH, B. and COLLINS, S. M. (1999).
  5. Capital Inflows, Investment and Growth, Tokyo Club Papers, 12, 35-74.
  6. CARKOVIC, M. and LEVINE, R. (2002). Does Foreign Direct Investment Accelerate Growth? Financial Globalization: A Blessing or a Curse, World Bank Conference. CHANG, H.J. (2004). Regulation of Foreign Investment in Historical Perspective. The European Journal of Development Research, 16(3), Autumn 2004, 687–715.
  7. CHOE, J. (2003). Do Foreign Direct Investment and Gross Domestic Investment Promote Economic Growth? Review of Development Economics, 7(1), 44–57.
  8. CHOWDHARY, R. and KUSHWAHA, V. (2013).
  9. Domestic Investment, Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in India since Economic Reforms. Journal of Transformative Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 74-82.
  10. DE MELLO, L. R. (1999). Foreign direct investment-led growth: evidence from time series and panel data. Oxford Economic Papers, 51(1), 133–151.
  11. DICKEY, D. and FULLER, W.A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49, 1057-1072.
  12. DING, M., Y. Chen and BESSLER, S.L. (2006), Granger Causality: basic Theory and Application to Neuroscience, B. Schelter, M. Winterhalder and J. Timmer (eds.) Handbook of Time Series Analysis. Wiley, 437-460.
  13. DURHAM, J.B. (2004). Absorptive capacity and the effects of foreign direct investment and equity foreign portfolio investment on economic growth. European Economic Review, 48(2), 285-306.
  14. FARRELL, R. (2008). Japanese Investment in the World Economy: A Study of Strategic Themes in the Internationalisation of Japanese Industry. Britain: Edward Elgar. FRECKLETON, M., WRIGHT, A. and CRAIGWEL