SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyoloji Notları / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Paradigm Shift in Anthropology: Literary Turn and Literature

Antropolojide Paradigma Değişimi: Metinselliğe Dönüş ve Edebiyat

Meriç KÜKRER
Pages
16–32
Publication Date
2020-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The understandings of science formed within anthropology and the different types of texts produced by them are subjected to a historical and conceptual critical reading in the context of the paradigm shift that took place.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study has been established on concepts of scientific discourse, ethnographic text, narrative and allegory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The basic discussion is based on the relationship between ethnography and text.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The understandings of science formed within anthropology and the different types of texts produced by them are subjected to a historical and conceptual critical reading in the context of the paradigm shift that took place.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:etnografi · paradigma değişimi · metin

Abstract

This study has been established on concepts of scientific discourse, ethnographic text, narrative and allegory. The basic discussion is based on the relationship between ethnography and text. Ethnography points out to both field research and reasoning, as well as the text which rises from a long-term communication process with unique relationships. Ethnographers try to understand the groups or relationships that they study with from an “insider” perspective by participating in their daily life practices. They refer to the ethnographic way of textualizing, which is called ethnography, to express the meaning that they captured. In this study, relations of ethnography with text in social anthropology; allegory and polysemy, author and ethnographer; relations between the observer and the observed, literary turn come up for discussion. The understandings of science formed within anthropology and the different types of texts produced by them are subjected to a historical and conceptual critical reading in the context of the paradigm shift that took place.

Özet

Bu çalışma; bilimsel söylem, etnografik metin, hikâye, alegori kavramları üzerine kuruldu. Temel tartışma da etnografi ile metin arasındaki ilişkilerden ilerliyor. Etnografi, hem saha araştırmasına ve akıl yürütme yöntemine hem de uzun süreye yayılmış̧ kendine özgü ilişkilerle yürüyen bir iletişim sürecinin sonucunda ortaya çıkan metne işaret eder. Etnografik çalışma yapan araştırmacılar, çalıştıkları grupları ya da ilişki biçimlerini, kişilerin gündelik hayat pratiklerine katılarak “içeriden” bir bakışla anlamaya çalışırlar. Yakaladıkları anlamları ifade etmek için de yine etnografi adı verilen metinleştirme yoluna başvururlar. Bu çalışmada ise sosyal antropolojideki etnografi ile metin ilişkileri; alegori ve çok anlamlılık, yazar ve etnograf; gözlemci ve gözlenen arası ilişkiler; metinselliğe dönüş kavramı çerçevesinde tartışmaya açılıyor. Antropolojide teşekkül eden bilim anlayışları ile bunların ürettiği farklı türden metinler, gerçekleşen paradigma değişimi bağlamında tarihsel ve kavramsal olarak eleştirel bir okumaya tabi tutuluyor.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜKRER, M. (2020). Paradigm Shift in Anthropology: Literary Turn and Literature. Sosyoloji Notları, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 16–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/802172

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Clifford, J. (1981).
  2. On Ethnographic Surrealism, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol.23, No. 4, pp.539-564.
  3. Clifford, J. (1986a). Partial Truths, (Edited by Clifford, J. & Marcus, G. E.), Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethograpy, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  4. Clifford, J. (1986b). On Ethographic Allegory, (Edited by Clifford, J. & Marcus, G. E.), Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethograpy, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  5. Cohen, M. (2013). Introduction: Aspects of the Novel, (Edited by Cohen, M.), Novel Approaches to Anthropology, New York City: Lexington Books. Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, London: University of Minnesota Press.
  6. Geertz, C. (2007). Yerel Bilgi, (K. Emiroğlu Çev.) Ankara:
  7. Dost Kitabevi Yayınları.
  8. Geertz, C. (2010). Kültürlerin Yorumlanması, (H. Gür Çev.). Ankara:
  9. Dost Kitabevi Yayınları.
  10. Gupta, A. & Ferguson, J. (1997). “Discipline and Practice: The Field as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology”, Antropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 1-47.
  11. Lyotard, J. (2013). Postmodern Durum, (İ. Birkan Çev.) Ankara:
  12. BilgeSu Yayıncılık. Marcus, G. E. & Fischer M. M. (2013). Kültürel Eleştiri Olarak Antropoloji: İnsan Bilimlerinde Deneysel Bir An, (B. Cezar Çev.) İstanbul:
  13. Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  14. Narayan, K. (2016). Chekhov as Ethnographic Muse, (Edited By Wulff, H.), The Anthropologist as Writer: Genres and Contexts in the Twenty-First Century, Oxford: Berghahn. Okely, J. (1992). Anthropology and Autobiography: Participatory Experience and Embodied Knowledge, (Edited by Okely, J. and Callaway, H.) Anthropology and Autobiography, New York: Routledge. Rapport, N. (2016). Fiction and Anthropological Understanding: A Cosmopolitan Vision, (Edited By Wulff, H.), The Anthropologist as Writer: Genres and Contexts in the Twenty-First Century, Oxford: Berghahn. Ricoeur, P. (2002). Metin Modeli: Bir Metin Olarak Anlamlı Eylem. Arslan, Hüsamettin (der.), içinde, Hermeneutik ve Hümaniter Disiplinler (s.100-125). İstanbul:
  15. Paradigma Yayınları.
  16. Scholte, B. (1987). The Literary Turn in Contemporary Anthropology, Critique of Anthropology, Vol. 7, No.1, pp. 33-47.
  17. Stoller, P. (2015). What Is Literary Anthropology?, Current Anthropology, Vol.56, No.1, pp. 144-145.
  18. Tedlock, B. (1991). From Participant Observation to the Observation of Participation: The Emergence of Narra