SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Social Scientific Centered Issues / 2021 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of the Situation of the Children’s Intellectual Field in Families With 3-4 Years of Education Who Continues Pre-School Education in Toy Selection

Şeyma TÜRKMEN
Salih TÜRKMEN
Pages
86–96
Publication Date
2021-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the research, the participants; their level of knowledge about Multiple Intelligence Areas is insufficient, They do not think enough about which intelligence area or areas their children have, They do not know enough what kind of activities to do to develop their children's intelligence areas, It is seen as the result of the research that which intelligence areas they do not aim to develop.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Pre-school education; It can also be considered as a learning stage that aims to reveal the potential of the individual within the 0-72 months period, and which is tried to be carried out in a regular and consistent manner that supports the individual in creating his/her own development (Haktanır, 2012).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to examine whether families with children aged 3-4 years attending pre-school education consider children's intelligence areas when choosing toys.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the research, the participants; their level of knowledge about Multiple Intelligence Areas is insufficient, They do not think enough about which intelligence area or areas their children have, They do not know enough what kind of activities to do to develop their children's intelligence areas, It is seen as the result of the research that which intelligence areas they do not aim to develop.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:okul öncesi · çoklu zeka · oyuncak

Abstract

Pre-school education; It can also be considered as a learning stage that aims to reveal the potential of the individual within the 0-72 months period, and which is tried to be carried out in a regular and consistent manner that supports the individual in creating his/her own development (Haktanır, 2012). The aim of this study is to examine whether families with children aged 3-4 years attending pre-school education consider children's intelligence areas when choosing toys. In the study, the scanning model was used to examine whether families with children aged 3-4 years should consider intelligence areas in choosing toys. In the research, the families of the children attending the pre-school education institution in the province of Amasya, Taşova were determined as the universe. The sample of the study, on the other hand, is formed by using the appropriate sampling method from families with children aged 3-4 years who continue basic education in the 2018-2019 academic year. In the research, the Questionnaire Form was used as a data collection tool and multiple choice questions were used. In the analysis, descriptive statistics, percentage, frequency were used and interpreted with the support of related researches. According to the research, the participants; their level of knowledge about Multiple Intelligence Areas is insufficient, They do not think enough about which intelligence area or areas their children have, They do not know enough what kind of activities to do to develop their children's intelligence areas, It is seen as the result of the research that which intelligence areas they do not aim to develop.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKMEN, Ş., TÜRKMEN, S. (2021). Investigation of the Situation of the Children’s Intellectual Field in Families With 3-4 Years of Education Who Continues Pre-School Education in Toy Selection. Social Scientific Centered Issues, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 86–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/801330

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Adak Özdemir, A. & Ramazan, O. (2012). Oyuncağa çocuk, anne ve öğretmen bakış açısı. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 2(1), 2-16.
  2. Akandare, M. (2003). Eğitici Okul Oyunları. Ankara:
  3. Nobel Yayıncılık. Altan, M. Z. (1999). Çoklu zekâ kuramı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, (17), 105-117.
  4. Aral, N., Kandır, A., & Can Yaşar, M. (2000). Okul öncesi eğitim 1. Ankara:
  5. Ya-Pa Yayın Pazarlama. Arı, M. (2003). Türkiye’ de erken çocukluk eğitimi ve kalitenin önemi. Müzeyyen Sevinç (Ed.) içinde. Gelişim ve Eğitimde Yeni Yaklaşımlar (s.31- 40). İstanbul:
  6. Morpa Yayınları.
  7. Armstrong T. (1994). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Alexandria- Virginia: ASCD. Bayar Çelebi, D. (2007). Türkiye ve Azerbaycan‟daki çocuk oyunları ve oyuncaklarının karşılaştırmalı incelemesi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Muğla Üniversitesi,
  8. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Çağdaş Türk Lehçeleri Ve Edebiyatları Anabilim Dalı, Muğla. Bilir, Ş. & Dönmez, B. (1995) Hastanede oyun-yaş gruplarına göre hastanede yatan çocuklar, çocuk ve hastane. (2. Baskı). Ankara:
  9. Sim Matbaacılık. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara:
  10. Pegem Yayınları.
  11. Canlı, G. A. (2014). Gelişen dünyada çağdaş çocuk oyun alanları. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  12. Checkly, K. (1997). The first seven and the eight. Educational Leadership. 55(1), 8-13.
  13. Çakır, İ. (2005). Eğitimde yeni bir yaklaşım: Çoklu zekâ kuramı. Eğitim Bilim Aylık Eğitim ve Kültür Dergisi, Yıl:7, Sayı: 76, 2. 6-11.
  14. Demirel, Ö. (2000). Kuramdan uygulamaya eğitimde program geliştirme. Ankara PegemA Yayıncılık. Egemen, A., Yılmaz, Ö. & Akil, Ş. (2004). Oyun, oyuncak ve çocuk. ADÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 39- 42. Ergül, K. O.,Alp H. Çamlıyer, H., & Çamlıyer, H. (2007). Çoklu zekâ kuramı ve kinestetik zekânın önemi. İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi.4(2), 2-11.
  15. Ergün, M. (1980). Oyun ve oyuncak üzerine. Milli Eğitim, 1(1), 102-119.
  16. Gardner, H. (1995). Reflections on multiple intelligences: Myths and messages. Phi Delta Kapan, 77, 200-203.
  17. Gardner, H. (2004). Zihin çerçeveleri: Çoklu zekâ kuramı. (Çev. E Kılıç). İstanbul:
  18. Alfa Yayıncılık. Gardner, H. (2004a). Zihniyetleri değiştirmek. (Çev. A. Kardam). İstanbul:
  19. Acar Matbaacılık. Gardner, H. (Mayıs 2009). Çoklu zekâ. Çoklu Zekâ Konferansı, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi.
  20. Burdur. Gürel, E., & Tat, M. (2010). Çoklu zekâ kuramı: Tekli zekâ anlayışında