Journals / Sağlık Akademisyenleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Health care accreditation system in Australia

Avustralya’da sağlık hizmetleri akreditasyon sistemi

Pages
54–59
Publication Date
2018-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is thought that the research results will be useful for health policy makers, health professionals, academicians and students

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Increasing focus on patient safety, quality of health care and improving health outcomes around the world has led policy makers, stakeholders and health care providers to create standardized processes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Despite the fact that national accreditation studies have been started in our country since 2015, the first examples in the world are based on 40-50 years ago.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is thought that the research results will be useful for health policy makers, health professionals, academicians and students
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Akreditasyon · Hasta Güvenliği · Kalite

Abstract

Increasing focus on patient safety, quality of health care and improving health outcomes around the world has led policy makers, stakeholders and health care providers to create standardized processes. Accreditation is defined as an intervention that promotes patient safety and health care delivery at a high level. Despite the fact that national accreditation studies have been started in our country since 2015, the first examples in the world are based on 40-50 years ago. One of the first examples was the accreditation of health services in Australia in 1974. This study provides information about the Australian Health Care Accreditation System in the light of observations of Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care made during the 6 month period in 2016 in Sydney. It is thought that the research results will be useful for health policy makers, health professionals, academicians and students

Özet

Dünya genelinde hasta güvenliği ve sağlık hizmetlerinin kalitesini artırmak, sağlık sonuçlarını iyileştirmek üzerine odaklılığın artışı politika yapıcıları, paydaşları ve sağlık hizmet sunucularını standardize edilmiş süreçleri oluşturmaya yönlendirmiştir. Akreditasyon uygulaması hasta güvenliği ve yüksek kalitede sağlık hizmeti sunumunu destekleyen bir müdahale olarak tanımlanır. Ülkemizde 2015 yılından itibaren ulusal akreditasyon çalışmaları başlatılmış olmasına rağmen dünyadaki ilk örnekleri 40-50 yıl öncesine dayanır. İlk örneklerden biri olan Avustralya’da sağlık hizmetleri akreditasyonu 1974 yılında başlamıştır. Bu çalışmada literatüre ve Sydney’de bulunan Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care adlı kuruluşta 2016 yılında 6 aylık süre boyunca yapılan gözleme dayanan bilgiler ışığında, Avustralya Sağlık Hizmetleri Akreditasyon Sistemi hakkında bilgi verilmektedir. Araştırma sonuçlarının sağlık politika yapıcılarına, sağlık profesyonellerine, akademisyenlere ve öğrencilere çalışmalarında faydalı olacağı düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜDÜK, Ö. (2018). Health care accreditation system in Australia. Sağlık Akademisyenleri Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 54–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/798453

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (2012). National safety and quality health service standards. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/NSQHS-Standards-Sept-2012.pdf. adresinden elde edildi. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (2014). NSQHS standards in 2013: Transforming the safety and quality of health care. Sydney. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (2015). Australian commission on safety and quality in health care annual report 2014/15. Sydney. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (2016). Guide to the approval process for accrediting agencies. Sydney. Alkhenizan, A., Shaw, C. (2012). The attitude of health care professionals towards accreditation: A systematic review of the literatüre. Journal of Family and Community Medicine, 19(2), 74-80. Almasabi,M., Yang, H., Thomas, S. (2014). A systematic review of the association between healthcare accreditation and patient satisfaction. World Applied Sciences Journal, 31(9), 1618-1623. Approved Accrediting Agencies. 05.09.2017 tarihinde Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care web sayfasından elde edildi: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/assessment-to-the-nsqhs-standards/resources-to-implement-the-nsqhs-standards/#Contact-details
  2. Braithwaite, J., Westbrook, J., Pawsey, M., Greenfield, D., Naylor, J., Iedema, R., ve diğ. (2006). A prospective, multi-method, multi-disciplinary, multi-level, collaborative, social-organisational design for researching health sector accreditation [LP0560737]. BMC Health Services Research 6(113). DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-6-113.
  3. Brubakk, K., Vist, G. E., Bukholm, G., Barach, P., Tjomsland, O. (2015). A systematic review of hospital accreditation: the challenges of measuring complex intervention effects. BMC Health Services Research, 15, 280. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0933-x Cleveland, E. C., Dahn, B. T., Lincoln, T. M., Safer, M., Podesta, M., Bradley, E. (2011). Introducing health facility accreditation in Liberia. Global Public Health, 6(3), 271-282. EQuIPNational. 04.08.2017 tarihinde The Australian Council on Healthcare Standards web sayfasından elde edildi: https://www.achs.org.au/programs-services/equipnational/
  4. Fairbrother G., Gleeson M. (2000). EQuIP accreditation: Feedback from a Sydney teaching hospital. Australian Health Review, 23(1), 153-62.
  5. Greenfield, D., Civil, M., Donnison, A., Hogden, A., Hinchcliff, R., Westbrook, J., Braithwa