SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Researcher / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

The Analysis of the Relationship between Gross Fixed Investments, Institutional Quality and Economic Growth in Turkey

Türkiye’de Sabit Sermaye Yatırımları, Kurumsal Kalite ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi Analizi

Erdoğan TEYYARE
Kübra SAYANER
Journal
Researcher
Pages
179–196
Publication Date
2018-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings showed that increases in the levels of gross fixed investments and institutional quality affect economic growth positively, while increases in the level of public borrowing affect economic growth negatively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Gross fixed investments may contribute to economic growth by increasing capital formation, and consequently the production capacity and employment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study examines the gross fixed investments, public borrowing and institutional quality variables in Turkey during the period between 1984 and 2014 and analyzes the effect of these variables on the economic growth level using the Ordinary Least Squares method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings showed that increases in the levels of gross fixed investments and institutional quality affect economic growth positively, while increases in the level of public borrowing affect economic growth negatively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sabit Sermaye Yatırımları Kurumsal Kalite Ekonomik Büyüme EKK Kamu Borçları · Gross Fixed Investment Institutional Quality Economic Growth OLS Public Debts

Abstract

Gross fixed investments may contribute to economic growth by increasing capital formation, and consequently the production capacity and employment. As one of the basic elements of economic growth, investment level is in close relationship with the institutional structures of a country. Incentives provided by the institutional structure can be one of the indicators of investments and capital formation. This study examines the gross fixed investments, public borrowing and institutional quality variables in Turkey during the period between 1984 and 2014 and analyzes the effect of these variables on the economic growth level using the Ordinary Least Squares method. The findings showed that increases in the levels of gross fixed investments and institutional quality affect economic growth positively, while increases in the level of public borrowing affect economic growth negatively.

Özet

Sabit sermaye yatırımları, ülkelerin sermaye birikimine, dolayısıyla da üretim kapasitesi ve istihdam artışına yol açarak ekonomik büyümeye katkı sağlayabilmektedir. Ekonomik büyümenin temel unsurlarından biri olan yatırım düzeyi, ülkelerin kurumsal yapılarıyla çok yakın bir ilişki içerisindedir. Kurumsal yapının meydana getirdiği teşvikler, yatırımların ve sermaye birikiminin belirleyicilerinden biri olabilmektedir. Çalışmada Türkiye’de 1984-2014 yılları arasındaki sabit sermaye yatırımları, kamu borçlanması ve kurumsal değişkenlerin ekonomik büyüme düzeyi üzerine etkileri En Küçük Kareler Yöntemi EKK ile analiz edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak sabit sermaye yatırımları ve kurumsal kalite düzeyinde meydana gelen artışların, ekonomik büyümeyi pozitif yönde etkilediği, kamu borçlanma düzeyinde meydana gelen artışların ise ekonomik büyümeyi negatif yönde etkilediği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

TEYYARE, E., SAYANER, K. (2018). The Analysis of the Relationship between Gross Fixed Investments, Institutional Quality and Economic Growth in Turkey. Researcher, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 179–196. https://ajindex.com/articles/797529

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Acemoglu, D. (2009). Introduction to modern economic growth. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  2. Acemoglu, D., Simon, J., James, R. & Yunyong, T. (2003). Institutional causes, macroeconomic symptoms: Volatility, crises and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 49-123.
  3. Alesina, A. & Perotti, R. (1996). Income distribution, political stability and investment. European Economic Review, 40(6), 1203-1228.
  4. Alesina, A. & Weder, B. (1999). Do corrupt governments receive less foreign aid?. NBER Working Paper. Sayı 7108. http://www.nber.org/papers/w7108.pdf adresinden erişildi. (Erişim tarihi: 03.02.2018)
  5. Arslan, Ü. (2007). Kurumların iktisadi büyüme üzerindeki etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  6. Asteriou, D. & Price, S. (2001). Political instability and economic growth: UK time series evidence. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48(4), 383–399.
  7. Barro, R. J. (1996). Determinants of economic growth: A cross-country empirical study. NBER Working Papers. Sayı 5698. http:// www.nber.org/papers/w5698 adresinden erişildi. (Erişim tarihi: 03.02.2018)
  8. Barro, R.J. & Sala-i Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. Columbus: McGraw- Hill International. Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443.
  9. Berber, M., Sivri, U. & Artan, S. (2001). Türkiye'de yatırım harcamaları-ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi, AK modeli testi, 1968-1998. İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, Ekim Sayısı, 61-70.
  10. Blomstrom, M., Lipsey, R. E. & Zejan, M. (1996). Is fixed investment the key to economic growth?. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 269-276.
  11. Boskin, M. J. & Lau, L. J. (1992). Capital, technology and economic growth. (Der.; Rosenberg ve diğerleri), technology and the wealth of nations içinde (ss. 17-55). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  12. Butkiewicz, J. L. & Yanıkkaya, H. (2006). Institutional quality and economic growth: Maintenance of the rule of law or democratic institutions, or both?. Economic Modelling, 23(4), 648-661.
  13. Chong, A. & Calderon C. (2000). Causality and feedback between institutional measures and economic growth. Economics & Politics, 12(1), 69-81.
  14. Çetin, M. (2012). Sabit sermaye yatırımları ve ekonomik büyüme: Ampirik bir analiz. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 7(1), 211-230.
  15. De Haan, J. & Sturm, J. (2003). Does more democracy lead to greater economic freedom? New evidence for developing countries. European J