Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 591

Currency Crisis Models and an Institutional Currency Crisis Model from a Theoretical Perspective

Teorik Perspektiften Para Krizi Modelleri ve Kurumsal Model Örneği

Pages
9–19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to this view, considering possible macroeconomic cycles compatible with country’s economic and financial structure, improving economic and financial system with regulatory and supervisory mechanisms is very important.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are various causes that make countries vulnerable to economic instabiliti- es and financial fragilities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The changes and developments in politic, economic, technological, and ecological areas can cause economic crises.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to this view, considering possible macroeconomic cycles compatible with country’s economic and financial structure, improving economic and financial system with regulatory and supervisory mechanisms is very important.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There are various causes that make countries vulnerable to economic instabiliti- es and financial fragilities. The changes and developments in politic, economic, technological, and ecological areas can cause economic crises. However, the weaknesses of financial system is pointed out as the main factor in the emergen- ce of crises. In other words, deficiencies in operation, control and regulation of the system is at the forefront of emergence of crises. In this study, in the first ins- tance, first, second and third generation currency crisis models are reviewed. Se- cond, a review of fourth generation models which consider institutional factors in explaining currency crisis models are presented. In these models, weak instituti- onal structures are considered as one of the main reasons of crises. According to this view, considering possible macroeconomic cycles compatible with country’s economic and financial structure, improving economic and financial system with regulatory and supervisory mechanisms is very important.

Özet

Ülkeleri ekonomik istikrarsızlık ve finansal kırılganlıklara açık hale getiren çeşit- li etkenler vardır. Siyasal, ekonomik, teknolojik ve ekolojik alanlarda yaşanan de- ğişme ve gelişmeler ekonomik krizlerin ortaya çıkmasına neden olabilmektedir. Ancak krizlerin ortaya çıkmasında temel faktör olarak finansal sistemdeki zayıf- lıklar, bir başka ifade ile sistemin işleyiş, denetleme ve düzenlemesine yönelik eksiklikler ön plana çıkmaktadır. Bu çalışmada ilk olarak birinci, ikinci ve üçün- cü nesil para krizi modelleri gözden geçirilmiştir. İkinci olarak para krizi modelleri- ni açıklamada kurumsal faktörleri dikkate alan dördüncü nesil modellerin literatür taraması sunulmuştur. Bu modellerde zayıf kurumsal yapılar, krizlerin oluşma- sında temel nedenlerden birisi olarak gösterilmektedir. Bu görüşe göre, ülkelerin ekonomik ve finansal yapısı doğrultusunda olası makroekonomik dalgalanmalar göz önünde bulundurularak, ekonomik ve finansal sistemin işleyişinin, düzenleyi- ci ve denetleyici mekanizmalarla geliştirilmesi büyük önem arz etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

VERGİL, H., TEYYARE, E. (2014). Currency Crisis Models and an Institutional Currency Crisis Model from a Theoretical Perspective. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 591, 9–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/204923

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. ACEMOGLU, Daron, Simon JOHNSON and James ROBIN- SON; (2001), “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Develop- ment: An Empirical Investigation,” The American Economic Review, 9 (5), pp. 1369-1401.
  2. ACEMOGLU, Daron, Simon JOHNSON, James ROBINSON and Yunyong THAICHAROEN; (2003), “Institutional Causes, Macroeconomic Symptoms: Volatility, Crises and Growth,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 50 (1), pp. 49-123.
  3. ALESINA, Alberto and Alexander WAGNER; (2003), Choosing (and reneging on) Exchange Rate Regimes, NBER Working Paper 9809, http://www.nber.org/papers/w9809, 23.03.2013.
  4. BERLEMANN, Michael, Kalin HRISTOV and Nikolay NE- NOVSKY; (2002),
  5. Lending of Last Resort, Moral Hazard and Twin Crises: Lessons From the Bulgarian Financial Crisis 1996/1997, William Davidson Working Papers 464, http:// wdi.umich.edu/files/publications/workingpapers/wp464.pdf, 01.02.2012.
  6. BLOCK, Steven A.; (2002), Political Conditions and Currency Crises: Empirical Regularities in Emerging Markets, CID Work- ing Papers 79, http://www.hks.harvard.edu/var/ezp_site/stor- age/fckeditor/file/pdfs/centersprograms/centers/cid/publica- tions/faculty/wp/079.pdf, 23.03.2013.
  7. BUSSIERE, Matthieu and Christian MULDER; (1999), “Political Instability and Economic Vulnerability”, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 5 (4) pp. 309-330.
  8. CALVO, Guillermo and Frederic S. MISHKIN; (2003), “The Mi- rage of Exchange Rate Regimes for Emerging Market Coun- tries.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17 (4), pp. 99-118. CHANG Roberto and Andres VELASCO; (1998), Financial Crises in Emerging Markets: A Canonical Model, NBER Work- ing Paper Series 6606, http://www.nber.org/papers/w6606.pdf, 01.02.2012.
  9. CORBETT, Jenny and David VINES; (1999), “Asian Currency and Financial Crises: Lessons from Vulnerability, Crisis and Collapse”, The World Economy, 22 (2), pp. 155-177.
  10. CORSETTI, Giancarlo, Paolo Pesenti and Nouriel Roubini; (1996), “What Caused the Asian Currency and Financial Cri- sis? Part I: A Macroeconomic Overview,” NBER Working Paper Series 6833, http://www.nber.org/papers/w6833, 01.03.2012.
  11. DELİCE, Güven; (2003), “Finansal Krizler: Teorik ve Tarihsel Bir Perspektif,” Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakül- tesi Dergisi, 20, ss.57-81.
  12. DİAMOND, Douglas and Philip H. Dybvig; (1983), “Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity”, Journal of Political Economy, 91, pp. 401-419.
  13. DOĞANLAR, Murat, Harun BAL ve Mehmet ÖZMEN; (2007), “Döviz Krizi Modelleri,” Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergi