SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Research on Education and Psychology / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Validity and Reliability Study of the Teacher Value Scale

Füsun Gülderen ALACAPINAR
Pages
111–126
Publication Date
2019-12-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We can collect variables from one dimension according to the results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We should include achievements related to the affective fields in teacher education and we should provide to gain them to the people.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We can increase the quality of education by solving some problems of the teacher.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We can collect variables from one dimension according to the results.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Teacher value scale · Validity · Reliability

Abstract

We should include achievements related to the affective fields in teacher education and we should provide to gain them to the people. Societies have given value to educators. If the source and content of these values are determined, some problems in teacher training and employment can be solved. We can increase the quality of education by solving some problems of the teacher. What is the level of validity and reliability of the given value scale to the teacher? The researcher uses scanning model of quantitative research method. Cronbach Alpha coefficient is .961 for eleven articles. We checked a sample size of the questionnaire with exploratory factor analysis. Kaiser Meyer- Olkin test value of sample size is .885. We determined the meaningfulness of Bartlett's test of Sphericity in the second step. 6663.000 value is greater than the value read from the table. We did factor analysis after these conditions satisfied. We can collect variables from one dimension according to the results. This explains. 83,975 of the total variance.The first value is considered as the factor tothe difference in the first value is wide. We extracted no variables due to the collected data from one factor. We finalized the teacher value scale.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALACAPINAR, F. G. (2019). Validity and Reliability Study of the Teacher Value Scale. Research on Education and Psychology, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 111–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/797270

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Aik-Kwang, N. (2002). The Development of a new scale to measure teachers' attitudes toward students (TATS). Hong KongEducational Research Journal, 17(1), 63-77.
  2. Akyüz, Y. (2014).Türk eğitim tarihi. M.Ö.1000- M.S.2014 [History of Education in Turkey]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi. Alacapınar, F. G. (1994). Özel ve devlet okulu öğretmenlerinin sınıf içi etkinlikleri [In-class activities of private and public school teachers]. (Master’s thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey). Alacapınar, F. G. (2011). İlköğretim öğrencileri “öğretmenlerini” nelere benzetmektedirler? [What do primary school students compare to their “teachers?] Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Selçuk University Journal of Ahmet Kelesoglu EducationFaculty], 32, 249-263.
  3. Alacapınar, F. G. (2012). Öğretim üyesinin eğitim ortamında sergilediği davranışların öğrencide oluşturduğu duyuşsal tepkiler [Affective reactions of student's behaviors in educational environment]. 2. Ulusal Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Kongresi, Bolu, Türkiye [2. National Curriculum of Instruction Congress, Bolu, Turkey]. Alacapınar, F. G. (2015). Üniversite öğrencileri “öğretim üyelerini” nelere benzetmektedirler? [What do university students liken academic members to?] Asian Conference on Education. Kobe, Japan. Alacapınar, F. G. (2016). Eğitim dersleri için gereksinim analiz [Necessity analysis of educational lesson]. Paper presented at the14 th International Teacher Education for Sustainable Development, Culture and Education, Konya, Turkey. Alacapınar, F. G. (2018). Meslek olarak öğretmenlik [Teaching as a profession]. In M, Yavuz (Ed.), Eğitim bilimine giriş [Introduction to educational science] (pp. 247-274).
  4. Ankara, Turkey: Anı Yayıncılık. Arthaud-Day, M.L., Rode, J. C., Mooney, C.H., & Near, J. P. (2005). The subjective well-being construct: A test of its convergent, discriminant, and factorial validity. Social Indicators Research, 74(3), 445-476.
  5. Aytaç, K. (1972). Avrupa eğitim tarihi. [History of education in Europe]. Ankara, Turkey: Ankar aUniversity. Balay, R., & Sağlam, M. (2008). Sınıf içi olumsuz davranışlara ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri [Teachers' opinions about negative behaviors in the classroom]. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education], 5(2), 1-24.
  6. Baykara-Pehlivan, K. (2008). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının sosyo-kültürel özellikleri ve öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutumları üzerine bir çalışma. [A study on the soc