Journals / Near East University Online Journal of Education / 2020 / Cilt: 3

EXAMINATION OF TEACHERS’ OPINIONS ABOUT HOMESCHOOLING SERVICE

Pages
1–11
Publication Date
2020-01-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is emphasized that the homeschooling service increases academic skills of the students while students’ distance from their peers and the social environment is a disadvantage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The goal of this research is to determine teachers’ opinions about the homeschooling service.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Teachers participated in the research are the ones provided the homeschooling services in Sakarya City Centre within 2018-2019 school year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is emphasized that the homeschooling service increases academic skills of the students while students’ distance from their peers and the social environment is a disadvantage.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018-2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:homeschooling · focus group discussion

Abstract

The goal of this research is to determine teachers’ opinions about the homeschooling service. Teachers participated in the research are the ones provided the homeschooling services in Sakarya City Centre within 2018-2019 school year. Qualitative research method has been used for the research and data has been collected via focus group discussion. Descriptive analysis technique has been used for analysing the obtained data. When the findings of the research are examined, participants who have been providing homeschooling services in a range of one to three years, stated that they had no prior information about homeschooling services, and they enhanced their knowledge level within the process of the education. Every single one of the participants specified that they all practiced observation and evaluation to determine educational performance and the needings of the students during the early weeks of homeschooling service, and afterwards they created individualized education plan (IEP) and figured the educational process according to this plan for their students. The lack of awareness about homeschooling, the families’ behaviours and experiencing insufficiency about the supplies are expressed as encountered problems within the homeschooling process. It is emphasized that the homeschooling service increases academic skills of the students while students’ distance from their peers and the social environment is a disadvantage.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPRAK, Ö., YIKMIŞ, A. A., KURTOĞLU, S. (2020). EXAMINATION OF TEACHERS’ OPINIONS ABOUT HOMESCHOOLING SERVICE. Near East University Online Journal of Education, Cilt: 3, 1–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/793372

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Apple, M. (2000). The cultural politics of home schooling. Peabody Journal of Education, 75(2), 256-271.
  2. Basham, P., Merrified, J., & Hepburn, Claudia R. (2007). Home schooling: From the extreme to mainstream. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute. Brabant, C., Bourdon, S., & Jutras, F. (2003). Home education in Quebec: Family first. Evaluation & Research in Education, 17(2-3), 112-131.
  3. Birkan, B. (2002). Erken ozel egitim hizmetleri. Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Ozel Egitim Dergisi, 3(2), 99-109.
  4. Collom, E. (2005). The ins and outs of homeschooling: The determinants of parental motivations and student achievement. Education and Urban Society, 37(3), 307-335. Evde ve Hastanede Egitim Hizmetleri Yonergesi, (2010). Retrieved from https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2012_10/02031840_evde_hastanede_egitim _hiz_yonergesi.pdf on 01.04.2019.
  5. English, R. M. (2013). The most private private education: Home education in Australia. Homeschool Researcher, 29(4), 1-7.
  6. ERG. (2014). Turkiye egitim sisteminde esitlik ve akademik basari arastirma raporu ve analiz. IIstanbul: Egitim Reformu Girisimi. Erturk, S. (1997). Egitimde program gelistirme. Ankara:
  7. Meteksan. Fields-Smith, C., & Williams, M. (2009). Motivations, sacrifices, and challenges: Black parents’ decisions to home school. The Urban Review, 41(4), 369-389.
  8. Gozun, O., & Yikmis, A.(2004). Ilkogretim mufettislerinin kaynastirma uygulamasina iliskin gorus ve onerileri. Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Ozel Egitim Dergisi, 5(2), 79-88.
  9. Korkmaz, H., & Duman, G. (2014). Public understanding about homeschooling: A preliminary study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3891-3897.
  10. Knuth, J. D., & Johnson, S. A. (2010). A descriptive analysis of homeschooling children with autism (Doctoral Dissertation). California State University, Sacramento. Lubienski, C. (2003). A critical view of home education. Evaluation & Research in Education, 17(2-3), 167-178. Ozel Egitim Hizmetleri Yonetmeligi, (2018). Retrieved from https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2018_07/09101900_ozel_egitim_hizmetleri _yonetmeligi_07072018.pdf on 20.03.2019.
  11. Petrie, A. (1995). Home education in Europe and the implementation of changes to the law. International Review of Education, 47(5), 477-500.
  12. Princiotta, D., Bielick, S. & Chapman, C (2006). Homeschooling in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Ray, B. D. (2000). Home schooling: The amel