SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Natural and Applied Sciences Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: Special Issue: Full Papers of 2nd International Congress of Updates in Biomedical Engineering

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compatible Biomaterials For Realization of Interventional Operations

Seval UĞURLU
Engin BAYSOY
Mustafa KOCAKULAK
Pages
94–101
Publication Date
2021-01-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, proper biomaterials must be utilized for designing and development of MRI compatible interventional instruments by considering many factors including biocompatibility, MRI safety, MRI visibility, and other mechanical needing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Realization of interventional therapeutic procedures with guidance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a promising novelty in area of interventional surgery because of eliminating x-ray exposure to patient body.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Together with radiation free nature, advances in MRI techniques present superior soft tissue contrast and real time physiologic parameters from related tissue.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, proper biomaterials must be utilized for designing and development of MRI compatible interventional instruments by considering many factors including biocompatibility, MRI safety, MRI visibility, and other mechanical needing.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Magnetic Resonance Imaging · MRI Compatible Biomaterials · Biocompatibility

Abstract

Realization of interventional therapeutic procedures with guidance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a promising novelty in area of interventional surgery because of eliminating x-ray exposure to patient body. Together with radiation free nature, advances in MRI techniques present superior soft tissue contrast and real time physiologic parameters from related tissue. However, the strong static magnetic field, magnetic radiofrequency (RF) pulses, and time-varying gradient fields applied during MRI, may result in exceeded heating risk over interventional instruments and adjacent tissue inside patient body. Additionally, since real time tracking and determination of device position inside patient body is critical for operators, sufficient visibility under MRI is another challenging issue to overcome. Therefore, proper biomaterials must be utilized for designing and development of MRI compatible interventional instruments by considering many factors including biocompatibility, MRI safety, MRI visibility, and other mechanical needing.

🔖

Cite This Article

UĞURLU, S., BAYSOY, E., KOCAKULAK, M. (2021). Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compatible Biomaterials For Realization of Interventional Operations. Natural and Applied Sciences Journal, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: Special Issue: Full Papers of 2nd International Congress of Updates in Biomedical Engineering, 94–101. https://ajindex.com/articles/793079

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. World Health Organization. Communicating Radiation Risks in Paediatric Imaging: Information to support health care discussions about benefit and risk. Switzerland, World Health Organization, 2016.
  2. United Nations. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. Vol. I:SOURCES. New York: United Nations, 2000
  3. Vano, Eliseo, Luciano Gonzalez, Jose M. Fernández and Ziv J. Haskal. “Eye Lens Exposure to Radiation In Interventional Suites: Caution Is Warranted.” Radiology. Vol. 248, no. 3 (2008): 945- 953
  4. Goldstein, James A., Stephen Balter, Michael Cowley, John Hodgson and Lloyd W. Klein. "Occupational Hazards of Interventional Cardiologists: Prevalence of Orthopedic Health Problems in Contemporary Practice.” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, Vol. 63, no. 4 (2004): 407-411
  5. Lederman, Robert J. “Cardiovascular Interventional MRI”, NIH Public Access, Vol. 112, no. 19(2005): 3009-3017
  6. Barkhausen, Jörg., Thomas Kahn, Gabriele A. Krombach, Christiane K. Kuhl, Joachim Lotz, David Maintz, Jense Ricke, Stefan O. Schönberg, Thomas J. Vogl, and Frank K. Wacker. “White Paper: Interventional MRI: Current Status and Potential for Development Considering Economic Perspectives, Part 1: General Application.” Fortschr Röntgenstr, Vol. 189, no. 7, (2017): 611-623.
  7. Ratner, Buddy, Allan Hoffman, Frederick Schoen and Jack Lemons, eds. Biomaterials Science:An Introduction To Materials In Medicine. Third Edition. Oxford: ELSEVIER, 2012 8. Atalar, Ergin, Paul A. Bottomley, Ogan Ocali, Luis C. L. Correia, Mark D. Kelemen, Joao A. Lima and Elias A. Zerhouni. “High Resolution Intravascular MRI and MRS by Using a Catheter Receiver Coil.” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 36, no. 4, (1996): 596-605
  8. ICNIRP, ICNIRP Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time Varying Electric, Magnetic and Electromagnetic Fields (Up To 300 Ghz), ICNIRP Publication, Vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 494-523, 1998. 10.Shellock Frank G. “Magnetic Resonance Safety Update 2002: Implants and Devices.” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging no.16, (2002): 485–496
  9. Istanbullu O. Burak, Gülşen Akdoğan. “Evaluation of MRI Compatibility and Safety Risks for Biomaterials.” Tıp Teknolojileri Ulusal Kongresi (2015): 368-375
  10. Settecase Fabio, Martin Alastair, Prasheel L