Journals / Middle Black Sea Journal of Health Science / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Clinical Evaluation of Injection of Corticosteroid and Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis

Pages
249–257
Publication Date
2022-05-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Corticosteroid injection results in superior clinical healing than prolotherapy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Plantar fasciitis is one of the primary causes of heel pain.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was aimed to evaluate the clinical results of corticosteroids and prolotherapy injection therapies.Methods: The gender, age, time of symptoms, BMI (body mass index) were specified in 60 patients with symptomatic chronic plantar fasciitis disorder between 2019 and 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Corticosteroid injection results in superior clinical healing than prolotherapy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:plantar fasciitis · corticosteroid · prolotherapy

Abstract

Objective: Plantar fasciitis is one of the primary causes of heel pain. Several treatment methods are substantial. This study was aimed to evaluate the clinical results of corticosteroids and prolotherapy injection therapies.Methods: The gender, age, time of symptoms, BMI (body mass index) were specified in 60 patients with symptomatic chronic plantar fasciitis disorder between 2019 and 2020. The patients were randomly divided into two groups as prolotherapy and corticosteroid groups. Foot pain and disability were evaluated via a visual analog scale (VAS) and foot function index (FFI) that interpreted the clinical scores measured at baseline and three months after the injections.Results: The distribution of age, gender, BMI, and duration were similar between groups. The mean VAS scores and FFI scores of all the groups were not significantly different in the baseline time (p > 0.05). A significant improvement was observed in the FFI and VAS scores of the patients in both injection groups (p < 0.05). The post-treatment VAS scores decreased from 8.03 to 4.93 (p=.003) and 7.76 to 4.23 (p=.002), respectively, in the prolotherapy and corticosteroid groups. The post-treatment FFI scores decreased from 176.1 to 126.9 (p=.004) and 181.5 to 121.1 (p=.002), respectively, in the prolotherapy and corticosteroid groups. The percentile decreases in VAS and FFI scores between groups were higher in favor of the corticosteroid group.Conclusion: Prolotherapy and corticosteroid injection treatments provide significant functional outcomes in short-term follow-up of the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Corticosteroid injection results in superior clinical healing than prolotherapy.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇALIŞAL, E., KARADENİZ, S., PEPE, M. (2022). Clinical Evaluation of Injection of Corticosteroid and Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis. Middle Black Sea Journal of Health Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 249–257. https://ajindex.com/articles/790993

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Buchbinder R. Plantar fasciitis. N Engl J Med. 2004
  2. 350(21):2159-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp032745 2. Rompe JD. Plantar fasciopathy. Sports medicine and arthroscopy review. 2009
  3. 17(2):100-4. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181a3d60e 3. Ryan MB, Wong A, Gillies J, Wong J, Taunton J. Sonographically guided intratendinous injections of hyperosmolar dextrose/lidocaine: a pilot study for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis. British journal of sports medicine. 2009
  4. 43(4):303-6. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.050021 4. Diaz-Llopis IV, Rodriguez-Ruiz CM, Mulet-Perry S, Mondejar-Gomez FJ, Climent-Barbera JM, Cholbi-LLobel F. Randomized controlled study of the efficacy of the injection of botulinum toxin type A versus corticosteroids in chronic plantar fasciitis: results at one and six months. Clinical rehabilitation. 2012
  5. 26(7):594-606. doi: 10.1177/0269215511426159 5. Scioli MW. Platelet-rich plasma injection for proximal plantar fasciitis. Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery. 2011
  6. 10(1):7-10. doi:10.1097/BTF.0b013e31820b4b63 6. Jahangiri A, Moghaddam FR, Najafi S. Hypertonic dextrose versus corticosteroid local injection for the treatment of osteoarthritis in the first carpometacarpal joint: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sci. 2014
  7. 19(5):737-43. doi: 10.1007/s00776-014-0587-2 7. Cole C, Seto C, Gazewood J. Plantar fasciitis: evidence-based review of diagnosis and therapy. Am Fam Physician. 2005
  8. 72(11):2237-42. https://www.aafp.org/afp/2005/1201/p2237.html 8. League AC. Current concepts review: plantar fasciitis. Foot & ankle international. 2008
  9. 29(3):358-66. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2008.0358 9. Puttaswamaiah R, Chandran P. Degenerative plantar fasciitis: A review of current concepts. The Foot. 2007
  10. 17(1):3-9. doi:10.1016/j.foot.2006.07.005 10. Crawford R. Diagnosis and treatment of plantar fasciitis. Am Fam Physician. 2011
  11. 84(6):676-82. https://www.aafp.org/afp/2011/0915/afp20110915p676.pdf 11. Yildiz Y, Apaydin AH, Seven MM, Orscelik A. The effects of prolotherapy (hypertonic dextrose) in recreational athletes with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Journal of Experimental & Integrative Medicine. 2016
  12. 6(2). doi: 10.5455/jeim.210616.or.152 12. Bae G, Kim S, Lee S, Lee WY, Lim Y. Prolotherapy for the patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2021
  13. 16(1):81. doi: 10.17085/apm.20078 13. Lai W-F, Yoon CH, Chiang MT, Hong Y-H, Chen H-C, Song W, et al. The effectiveness of dextrose prolotherapy in plantar