Journals / Medical Research Reports / 2018 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3

An Open Label Prospective Randomized Trial to Compare The Efficacy Tolerability and Cost Effectiveness of Brand Name Versus Two Different Generic Drug of Fixed Combination Dorzolamide 2% and Timolol 0.5% in The Treatment of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

Pages
55–60
Publication Date
2018-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Brand name product of D/T fixed combination is exactly more effective in IOP reduction and seems to be having a better lowering effect on resistive index, even a statistically significant result was not found.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To compare the efficacy tolerability and cost effectiveness of brand name versus two different generic drug of fixed combination dorzolamide 2% and timolol 0.5% in the treatment of primary open angle glaucoma.Methods: Sixty-six eyes of 66 patients with newly diagnosed, open-angle glaucoma were included in this prospective, examiner masked, randomized study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All patients underwent routine ophthalmic examinations at baseline and 6 months of treatment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Brand name product of D/T fixed combination is exactly more effective in IOP reduction and seems to be having a better lowering effect on resistive index, even a statistically significant result was not found.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:generic drug · cost effectiveness · retrobulbar bloodflow

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy tolerability and cost effectiveness of brand name versus two different generic drug of fixed combination dorzolamide 2% and timolol 0.5% in the treatment of primary open angle glaucoma.Methods: Sixty-six eyes of 66 patients with newly diagnosed, open-angle glaucoma were included in this prospective, examiner masked, randomized study. All patients underwent routine ophthalmic examinations at baseline and 6 months of treatment. After initial examination, patients were randomly divided into three groups and prescribed to use fixed combination treatment of dorzolamide/timolol (D/T) brand name and two different generic name drops. Retrobulbar blood flow was assessed with color Doppler imaging (CDI). At end-of-treatment assessments, patients were requested to fill in a questionnaire based on "the Comparison of Ophthalmic Medications for Tolerability".Results: Intraocular pressure (IOP) and CDI measurements were similar at baseline. Compared to baseline, the brand name drop had a better resistive index lowering effect than two other generic drugs, however the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.056). Brand name D/T fixed combination provided greater significant mean IOP reductions from baseline than two other generic name drops (p=0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the IOP lowering effect between generic drops (p=0.562). Tolerability was similar between groups. Generic bottles failed to last a month for 80% patients. Conclusions: Brand name product of D/T fixed combination is exactly more effective in IOP reduction and seems to be having a better lowering effect on resistive index, even a statistically significant result was not found.

🔖

Cite This Article

ELİAÇIK, M. (2018). An Open Label Prospective Randomized Trial to Compare The Efficacy Tolerability and Cost Effectiveness of Brand Name Versus Two Different Generic Drug of Fixed Combination Dorzolamide 2% and Timolol 0.5% in The Treatment of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. Medical Research Reports, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3, 55–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/789938

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Januleviciene I, Ehrlich R, Siesky B, Nedzelskiene I, Harris A. Visual function, optic nerve structure, and ocular blood flow parameters after 1 year of glaucoma treatment with fixed combinations. Eur J Ophthalmol 2009;19:790-797.2. Chen SD, Wang L, Zhang XL. Neuroprotection in glaucoma: present and future. Chin Med J 2013;126:1567-1577.3. Siesky B, Harris A, Ehrlich R, et al. Short-term effects of brimonidine/timolol and dorzolamide/timolol on ocular perfusion pressure and blood flow in glaucoma. Adv Ther 2012;29:53-63.4. Martinez A, Sanchez M. Effects of dorzolamide 2% added to timolol maleate 0.5% on intraocular pressure, retrobulbar blood flow, and the progression of visual field damage in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma: a single-center, 4-year, open-label study. Clin Ther 2008;30:1120-1134.5. Martinez A, Sanchez M. A comparison of the effects of 0.005% latanoprost and fixed combination dorzolamide/timolol on retrobulbar haemodynamics in previously untreated glaucoma patients. Curr Med Res Opin 2006;22:67-73.6. Harris A, Arend O, Kagemann L, Garrett M, Chung HS, Martin B. Dorzolamide, visual function and ocular hemodynamics in normal-tension glaucoma. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 1999;15:189-197.7. Martinez A, Sanchez-Salorio M. A comparison of the long-term effects of dorzolamide 2% and brinzolamide 1%, each added to timolol 0.5%, on retrobulbar hemodynamics and intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma patients. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2009;25:239-248.8. Martinez A, Sanchez-Salorio M. Predictors for visual field progression and the effects of treatment with dorzolamide 2% or brinzolamide 1% each added to timolol 0.5% in primary open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 2010;88:541-552.9. Fiscella RG, Jensen MK. Cost analysis of glaucoma medications. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:1108-1109; author reply 1109.10. Ikeda H, Tsukamoto H, Sawa A, Sugimoto A, Mishima H, Kihira K. Comparison of annual cost between brand and generic ocular beta-adrenergic blockers. Yakugaku Zasshi 2005;125:463-467.11. Schlenker MB, Trope GE, Buys YM. Comparison of United States and canadian glaucoma medication costs and price change from 2006 to 2013. J Ophthalmol 2015;2015:547960.12. Mehl B, Santell JP. Projecting future drug expenditures--2000. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2000;57:129-138.13. Barber BL, Strahlman ER, Laibovitz R, Guess HA, Reines SA. Validation of a questionnaire for comparing the tolerability of ophthalmic medications. Ophthalmol 1997;104:334-342.14. Beckers HJ, Sc