SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Maliye Dergisi / 2013 / Sayı: 164

The classical origins of modern fiscal theory: Fiscal thought from Ibn Khaldun to “Post-Cameralism”

Modern maliye teorisinin klasik kökenleri: İbni Haldun'dan “post-kameralizm”e mali düşünce

CEYHUN GÜRKAN
Pages
1–26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper focuses on Ibn Khaldun and cameralism and examines the influence of classical fiscal theories on modern fiscal thought and how these classical theories are interpreted today.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Problems arising in modern fiscal theory can be defined as disciplinarization, technicism and specialization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the field of fiscal theory, two tendencies have generally appeared to overcome these problems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper focuses on Ibn Khaldun and cameralism and examines the influence of classical fiscal theories on modern fiscal thought and how these classical theories are interpreted today.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Problems arising in modern fiscal theory can be defined as disciplinarization, technicism and specialization. In the field of fiscal theory, two tendencies have generally appeared to overcome these problems. These are interdisciplinary studies like fiscal sociology and fiscal politics, and investigations into the classical thoughts underlying the modern fiscal theory. In the junction of these two tendencies of modern fiscal theory, the fiscal thought of Ibn Khaldun and cameralism take the most attention today. This paper focuses on Ibn Khaldun and cameralism and examines the influence of classical fiscal theories on modern fiscal thought and how these classical theories are interpreted today.

Özet

Modern maliye teorisinde ortaya çıkan sorunlar disiplinleşme, teknikleşme ve uzmanlaşma olarak tanımlanabilir. Bu sorunları aşma yolunda maliye teorisi alanında esas olarak iki yönelim belirmiştir. Bunlar mali sosyoloji ve mali siyaset gibi disiplinlerarası çalışmalar ile modern maliye teorisinin klasik kökenlerindeki düşüncelere yönelik araştırmalardır. İbni Haldun’un ve kameralizmin maliye düşüncesi modern maliye teorisinin bu iki yöneliminin kesişiminde günümüzde en çok dikkati çeken maliye teorileridir. Bu çalışma İbni Haldun’u ve kameralizmi odağa alarak klasik maliye teorilerinin günümüz modern maliye düşüncesine etkisini ve bu klasik teorilerin günümüzde nasıl yorumlandığını incelemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRKAN, C. (2013). The classical origins of modern fiscal theory: Fiscal thought from Ibn Khaldun to “Post-Cameralism”. Maliye Dergisi, Sayı: 164, 1–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/78984

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Alada, D.A. (2007), “Öncü İktisat Düşünürleri Yeni Liberalizme Karşı (mı)?”, Toplum ve Bilim, 108, 167-185.
  2. Andic, S. (1965), “A Fourteenth Century Sociology of Public Finance”, Public Finance, 20 (1-2), 22-44.
  3. Andic, F.M. ve Andic, S. (1985), “An Exploration into Fiscal Sociology: Ibn Khaldun, Schumpeter, and Public Choice”, Finanzarchiv, 43(83), 454-469.
  4. Arslan, A. (2009),
  5. İbni Haldun, İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  6. Backhaus J.G. ve Wagner, R.E. (1987), “The Cameralists: Public Choice Perspective”, Public Choice, 53, 3-20.
  7. Backhaus, J.G. ve Wagner, R.E. (2004), “Society, State and Public Finance: Setting the Analytical Stage”, J.G. Backhaus ve R.E. Wagner (der.), Handbook of Public Finance içinde, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing, 1-13.
  8. Backhaus, J.G. ve Wagner, R.E. (2005), “From Continental Public Finance to Public Choice: Mapping Continuity”, History of Political Economy, 37 (Suppl. 1), 314-332.
  9. Backhaus, J.G. (2002), “Old or New Public Finance: A Plea for the Tried and True”, Public Finance Review, 30(6), 612-645.
  10. Basu, R.L. (2011), Kautilya’s Arthasastra (300 B.C.): Economic Ideas, http://www.smashwords.com/books/download/65088/1/latest/0/0/kautliyasarthasastra- 300-bc-economic-ideas.pdf Boulakia, J.D.C. (1971), “Ibn Khaldun: A Fourteenth-Century Economist”, The Journal of Political Economy, 79(5), 1105-1118.
  11. Braudel, F. (2002),
  12. The Structure of Everyday Life, S. Reynolds (çev.), Londra: Phoenix Press.
  13. Brennan, G. ve Buchanan, J.M. (2000), The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution, The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan Vol. 9, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Buchanan, J.M. (1966), “„La Scienza delle Finanze‟: Maliye Teorisinde İtalyan Geleneği”, A.Nemli (çev.), Maliye Teorisi ve Politik İktisat: Seçilmiş Makaleler içinde, İstanbul: Fakülteler Matbaası, 21-66.
  14. Buchanan, J.M. (1975), “Public Finance and Public Choice”, National Tax Journal, 28(4), 383-394.
  15. Buchanan, J.M. (1987), “The Constitution of Economic Policy”, The American Economic Review, 77(3), 243-250.
  16. Congdon W.J., Kling, J.R. ve Mullainathan, S. (2011), Policy and Choice: Public Finance through the Lens of Behavioral Economics, Washington: The Brookings Institution. Dome, T. (2004), The Political Economy of Public Finance in Britain, 1767-1873, Londra/NY: Routledge. Eusepi, G. ve Wagner, R.E. (2013), “Tax Prices in a Democratic Polity: The Continuing Relevance of Antonio de Viti de Marco”, History of Political Economy, 45(1), 99-121.
  17. Falay, N. (19