Journals / Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 5

EXAMINATION OF RETAILER BRANDS WITH CONSUMERS’ AND RETAILERS’ PERSPECTIVE: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

PERAKENDECİLER VE TÜKETİCİLER AÇISINDAN PERAKENDECİ MARKALAR: KAVRAMSAL BİR ÇERÇEVE

Pages
160–171
Publication Date
2017-12-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, it has been determined that retailers should pay attention to store image, social responsibility activities and balance of shelf allocation for RB success.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to put forward the development of retailing brands, the summarize the importance of those brands for retailers, and identify the factors affecting their consumption from a holistic point of view.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The preference of RB differs according to the consumer characteristics, and it increases as the experience and awareness of consumers increase.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, it has been determined that retailers should pay attention to store image, social responsibility activities and balance of shelf allocation for RB success.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Özel Marka · Mağaza Markası · Perakendeci Markası

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to put forward the development of retailing brands, the summarize the importance of those brands for retailers, and identify the factors affecting their consumption from a holistic point of view. Methods: Retailing brand literature was reviewed, and the findings were summarized in terms of both consumers and retailers. Results: Literature shows that the quality perception is as important as the price in the retailer brand (RB) purchase decision but the difference of subjective quality perception between the producer and retailer brands is still high. The social risk perception does not adversely affect the RB preference contrary to the expectation. The preference of RB differs according to the consumer characteristics, and it increases as the experience and awareness of consumers increase. There is an opportunity for RBs to be successful in different product categories. On the other hand, it has been determined that retailers should pay attention to store image, social responsibility activities and balance of shelf allocation for RB success.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma, perakendeci markaların gelişimini irdelemek ve bu markaların tüketimini etkileyen faktörleri bütüncül bir bakış açısı ile ortaya koymak ve bu markaların perakendeci için yarattığı faydaları saptamak amacını gütmektedir.Yöntem: Perakendeci markalara ilişkin bir literatür taraması yapılmış ve buna istinaden literatürde perakendeci markalarına ilişkin bulgular hem tüketici hem perakendeci açısından özetlenmiştir. Bulgular: Kalite algısı perakende markaların (PM) tercihinde fiyat kadar önemlidir. Ancak perakendeci ve üretici markaları ile arasındaki sübjektif kalite algısı farkı hala yüksektir. Sosyal risk algısının beklenenin aksine PM tercihini olumsuz etkilememektedir. PM tercihi tüketici özelliklerine göre farklılık göstermekte, bununla birlikte tüketicinin deneyimi ve aşinalığı arttığında PM tercihi artmaktadır. PM için kategori genişleme fırsatı vardır. Ancak perakendecilerin kendi markalarının tercihi için mağaza imajına, sosyal sorumluluk faaliyetlerine, raf tahsisindeki dengeye önem vermeleri gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ecevit, M. Z., Akturan, U. (2017). EXAMINATION OF RETAILER BRANDS WITH CONSUMERS’ AND RETAILERS’ PERSPECTIVE: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK. Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 5, 160–171. https://ajindex.com/articles/785670

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akbay C., Jones E., (2005), Food Consumption Behavior of Socioeconomic Groups for Private Labels and National Brands. Food Quality and Preference, 16, 621-631
  2. Alan D. Jain A. Richardson P. (1996), How Consumers Evaluate Store Brands. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 5 (2), 19 - 28 Anselmsson J., Johansson U., Maranon A., Persson N., (2008), The penetration of retailer brands and the impact on consumer prices—A study based on household expenditures for 35 grocery categories, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 15, 42-51
  3. Bao Y., Sheng S., Bao Y., Stewart D., (2011), Assessing Quality Perception of Private Labels: Intransient Cues and Consumer Characteristics, Journal Of Consumer Marketing, 28 (6), 448-458
  4. Bauer H.H., Heinrich D., Schäfer D. B., (2013), The Effects of Organic Labels on Global, Local, and Private Brands More Hype Than Substance?, Journal of Business Research, 66, 1035-1043
  5. Beneke J., Flynn R., Greig T, Mukaiwa M., (2013), The Influence of Perceived Product Quality, Relative Price and Risk on Customer Value and Willingness to Buy: A Study Of Private Label Merchandise, Journal of Product and Brand Management, 22 (3), 218-228
  6. Beneke J., Greene A., Lok I., Mallet K., (2012), The Influence of Perceived Risk on Purchase Intention – The Case of Premium Grocery Private Label Brands in South Africa, Journal of Product and Brand Management, 21 (1), 4-14
  7. Beneke J., Zimmerman N., (2014), Beyond Private Label Panache: The Effect of Store İmage and Perceived Price on Brand Prestige, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 31 (4), 301 – 311 Benito O. G., Partal M. M., (2012), Role of Retailer Positioning and Product Category on the Relationship Between Store Brand Consumption and Store Loyalty, Journal of Retailing, 88 (2), 236-249
  8. Boyle P. J., Lathrop E.S., (2013), The Value of Private Label Brands to U.S. Consumers: An Objective and Subjective Assessment, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20, 80-86
  9. Braak A., Deleersnyder B., Geyskens I., Dekimpe M. G., (2013), Does Private-Label Production By National-Brand Manufacturers Create Discounter Goodwill? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30, 343-357
  10. Cho Y. S. C., Rha H, Burt S., (2015), The Impact of Customer Awareness of Manufacturer Name Disclosure on Retail Brand Attitudes and Loyalty in Korea, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 22, 128-137
  11. Choi S., Fredj K., (2013), Price Competition and Store Competition: Store Brands vs. National Brand, European Journal of Operationa