SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kıbrıs Türk Psikiyatri ve Psikoloji Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

A Meta-Analysis Study on Gender Differences in Psychological Resilience Levels

Ayşe GÖK
Esin YILMAZ KOĞAR
Pages
132–143
Publication Date
2021-06-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that there was no publication bias in the studies selected according to the funnel plot and Egger test findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The general purpose of the study is to provide a quantitative summary of the findings of studies that address the psychological resilience levels of individuals in terms of gender differences.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Because of the literature review, 30 thesis and article-type researches were selected for meta-analysis under the inclusion criteria of the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that there was no publication bias in the studies selected according to the funnel plot and Egger test findings.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Psychological Resilience · Gender Differences · Random Effects Model

Abstract

The general purpose of the study is to provide a quantitative summary of the findings of studies that address the psychological resilience levels of individuals in terms of gender differences. This study includes a review of the relevant literature, the stages of meta-analysis research, analysis findings got from the included studies, discussions on the results of the findings, and finally recommendations for future psychological resilience research. Because of the literature review, 30 thesis and article-type researches were selected for meta-analysis under the inclusion criteria of the study. The effect size was calculated for each study using the non-standardized mean difference method. It was concluded that there was no publication bias in the studies selected according to the funnel plot and Egger test findings. As a result of the analysis made according to the random effects model, it was determined that the effect size for gender has a significant effect on the psychological resilience level of the individuals, and the results are in favor of men. Because of the heterogeneity test, a moderate level of heterogeneity was found between studies. Reasons for this heterogeneity were the type of publication, the study group, the way the data were collected, and the total number of participants. It was found that only the study group variable among these variables can lead to heterogeneity.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖK, A., KOĞAR, E. Y. (2021). A Meta-Analysis Study on Gender Differences in Psychological Resilience Levels. Kıbrıs Türk Psikiyatri ve Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 132–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/785114

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akduman, G., & Karahan, G. (2020). Kabin memurunun sahip olması gereken yetkinlikler: sivil havacılık kabin hizmetleri mezunu istihdam edilen kişilerle bir alan araştırması. Havacılık ve Uzay Çalışmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 7-32.
  2. Akgöz, S., Ercan, İ., & Kan, İ. (2004). Meta analysis. Journal of Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine, 30(2), 107-112.
  3. Arı, F. A., & Çarkıt, E. (2020). Investigation of resilience in terms of gender: A meta-analysis study. Research on Education and Psychology (REP), 4(Special Issue), 34-52. http://dergipark.org.tr/rep
  4. Arslan, A. (2020). Beliren yetişkinlik dönemindeki bireylerin yakın ilişki şiddeti algılarının baş etme stilleri ve psikolojik sağlamlık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Artan, T., Atak, I., Karaman, M., & Cebeci, F. (2020). The relationship between sociodemographic characteristics, psychological resilience and anxiety levels in the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. Electronic Turkish Studies, 15(6), 79-94.
  5. Atkinson, R. L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., Bem, D. J., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2010). Introduction to Psychology. (Yavuz Alogan, Trans.). Friend Publishing. Aydın, İ., Erman, Ö., Akbulut, V., & Kılıç, S. K. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarında boş zaman sıkılma algısı ve psikolojik sağlamlık ilişkisi. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(1), 39-53.
  6. Aydın, M., & Egemberdiyeva, A. (2018). Üniversite öğrencilerinin psikolojik sağlamlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Türkiye Eğitim Dergisi, 3(1), 37-53.
  7. Aydoğdu, T. (2015). Investigation of the relationship between attachment styles, coping strategies and psychological resilience (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Gazi University. Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. Selfefficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5, 1-43.
  8. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(1), 155- 162. Beyazkılınç, E. (2019). Yüksek din öğretimi öğrencilerinde Allah’a bağlanma ve psikolojik sağlamlık: Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi örneği (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi.
  9. Bilge, Y. & Bilge, Y. (2020). Examining the effects of the coronavirus epidemic and social isolation on psychological symptoms in terms of psychological resilience and coping styles. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 23(1), 38-51.
  10. Biricik, Y. S., & Sivrikaya, M. H. (2020). Investigation of psychological resilience and sel