SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Tourism Research Institute / 2021 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Comperehensive model of desination social servicescape

Kapsamlı destinasyon sosyal hizmet alanı modeli

Kemal Gürkan KÜÇÜKERGİN
Pages
47–60
Publication Date
2021-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, suggestions were made on how to measure the aforementioned concepts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to present a comprehensive destination social servicescape model.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to achieve this, existing models and theories in the literature were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, suggestions were made on how to measure the aforementioned concepts.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kapsamlı sosyal destinasyon alanı · diğer kişilerin gösterdiği duygular · kalabalık

Abstract

This study aims to present a comprehensive destination social servicescape model. In order to achieve this, existing models and theories in the literature were examined. Based on this knowledge, a conceptual model proposal was provided. The elements of the comprehensive model for destination social servicescape were basically examined under three dimensions. These are the displayed emotions of others (i.e., family and friends, local people, employees, other tourists), the crowding perception, and the similarity. All of those dimensions have different sub-dimensions. As a result, it is expected that the destination social servicescape affects the tourists' own emotions and then emotions of tourists shape the behavioral intentions. In these relations, it is also important that tourists create a mediating effect on their own emotions. Apart from these relationships, several moderating variables have been proposed for future studies. Finally, suggestions were made on how to measure the aforementioned concepts.

Özet

Bu çalışma kapsamlı destinasyon sosyal hizmet alanı modelini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Bunu sağlamak için literatürdeki mevcut modeller ve teoriler incelenmiştir. Bu bilgi birikimine dayanarak bir model önerisinde bulunulmuştur. Kapsamlı destinasyon sosyal hizmet alanı unsurları temelde üç boyutla incelenmiştir. Bunlar; diğer kişilerin (aile ve arkadaşlar, yerel halk, çalışanlar, diğer turistler) gösterdiği duygular, kalabalık algısı ve benzerliktir. Bu sayılan unsurların hepsinin farklı alt boyutları mevcuttur. Sonuç olarak, destinasyon sosyal hizmet alanının turistlerin kendi duygularını etkilemesi ve turistlerin kendi duygularının ise davranışsal eğilimleri etkilemesi beklenmektedir. Bu ilişkilerde ayrıca, turistlerin kendi duygularının aracılık etkisi meydana getirmesi önem kazanmaktadır. Bu ilişkilerin dışında, gelecekteki çalışmalar için birtakım düzenleyici değişkenler önerilmiştir. Son olarak, bahsi geçen kavramların nasıl ölçülebileceğine ilişkin önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜÇÜKERGİN, K. G. (2021). Comperehensive model of desination social servicescape. Journal of Tourism Research Institute, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 47–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/781913

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adam, I. (2021). Negative tourist-to-tourist interactions, value destruction, satisfaction, and post consumption behavioral intention. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 20, 100557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100557
  2. Alhothali, G. T., Elgammal, I., & Mavondo, F. T. (2021). Religious servicescape and intention to revisit: potential mediators and moderators. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2020.1862885
  3. Arslantürk, Y., Altunöz, Ö., Bülbül, S., & Güral, F. N. (2013). İnanç turizmi ile ilgili Türkiye’de yapılan akademik çalışmaların incelenmesi. International Conference on Religious Tourism and Tolerance, 1245–1255.
  4. Konya. Barbieri, C., Santos, C. A., & Katsube, Y. (2012). Volunteer tourism: On-the-ground observations from Rwanda. Tourism Management, 33(3), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.05.009
  5. Bertuzzo, E., Mari, L., Pasetto, D., Miccoli, S., Casagrandi, R., Gatto, M., & Rinaldo, A. (2020). The geography of COVID-19 spread in Italy and implications for the relaxation of confinement measures. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18050-2
  6. Bitner, M. J. (1992). Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees. Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 57. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252042
  7. Conway, M., Di Fazio, R., & Mayman, S. (1999). Judging others’ emotions as a function of the others’ status. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695865
  8. Coplan, A. (2006). Catching Characters Emotions: Emotional Contagion Responses to Narrative Fiction Film. Film Studies, 8(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.7227/FS.8.5 D’Souza, J., Dawson, J., & Groulx, M. (2021). Last chance tourism: a decade review of a case study on Churchill, Manitoba’s polar bear viewing industry. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1910828
  9. Dedeoğlu, B. B., Balıkçıoğlu, S., Güral, F. N., & Küçükergin, K. G. (2014).
  10. Farklı Milletler, Farklı Algılar: Hizmet Alanında Bir Araştırma. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 2(3), 3–10.
  11. Dedeoğlu, B. B., Küçükergin, K. G., & Balıkçıoğlu, S. (2015). Understanding the Relationships of Servicescape, Value, Image, Pleasure, and Behavioral Intentions Among Hotel Customers. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 32(sup1), S42–S61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2014.982268
  12. Dedeoğlu, B. B., Van Niekerk, M., Weinland, J., & Celuch, K. (2019). Re-conceptualizing customer-based destination brand equity. Journal of Dest