SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Teacher Education and Educators / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Promoting inquiry skills for the improvement of self-efficacy domains in special education pre-service teacher training

Sevda DOĞAN DOLAPÇIOĞLU
Pages
201–220
Publication Date
2020-08-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Qualitative results show that teacher trainees need to improve the domains of self-confidence in knowledge acquisition and knowledge verification as inquiry skills.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The inquiry skill that is as important as developing teacher self-efficacy domains as a whole is quite crucial to maintain the enhancement of professional self-efficacy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This phenomenon is twofold as both quantitative and qualitative.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Qualitative results show that teacher trainees need to improve the domains of self-confidence in knowledge acquisition and knowledge verification as inquiry skills.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Inquiry skills · special education · teacher education

Abstract

The inquiry skill that is as important as developing teacher self-efficacy domains as a whole is quite crucial to maintain the enhancement of professional self-efficacy. This phenomenon is twofold as both quantitative and qualitative. The former is related to determine the predictive power of inquiry skills as the main variable which will trigger the development of teacher self-efficacy domains. The latter is concerned with deeply defining the main points hindering or fostering the improvement of inquiry skills in teacher education. To this end, the aim is to create opportunities for special education teacher educators to revise their in-class teaching practices. Based on quantitative results, inquiry skills of teacher trainees have a positive meaningful influence on self-efficacy skills. Qualitative results show that teacher trainees need to improve the domains of self-confidence in knowledge acquisition and knowledge verification as inquiry skills.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOLAPÇIOĞLU, S. D. (2020). Promoting inquiry skills for the improvement of self-efficacy domains in special education pre-service teacher training. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 201–220. https://ajindex.com/articles/780893

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Aldan-Karademir, Ç., & Saracaloglu, A. S. (2013). The development of ınquiry skills scale: reliability and validity study. Asian Journal of Instruction, 1(2), 56-65.
  2. Blanton, L. P., Sindelar, P. T., & Correa, V. I. (2006). Models and measures of beginning teacher quality. The Journal of Special Education, 40(2), 115-127. doi: 10.1177/00224669060400020201 Boardman, A. G., Argüelles, M. E., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Klingner, J. (2005). Special education teachers' views of research-based practices. The Journal of Special Education, 39(3), 168-180. doi: 10.1177/00224669050390030401 Brownell, M. T., Sindelar, P. T., Kiely, M. T., & Danielson, L. C. (2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations, constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 357-377. doi: 10.1177/001440291007600307 Cook, B. G., & Cook, S. C. (2013). Unraveling evidence-based practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 47(2), 71-82. doi: 10.1177/0022466911420877 Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Second Edition.
  3. Sage publications Inc. Çapa, Y., Çakıroğlu, J. & Sarıkaya, H. (2005). The development and validation of a Turkish version of the teachers’ sense of efficacy scale. Education and Science, 30 (137), 74-81.
  4. Çetinkaya, M.& Özyürek, C. (2019).
  5. T (2019). The effect of inquiry-based science activities on prospective science teachers’ scientific process skills. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 6(1), 56-70.
  6. Dukes, C., & Darling, S. M. (2014). Metaphors, organisms, and evolving approaches: Examining special education teacher preparation. doi: 10.1177/0888406413516157 Dukes, C., Darling, S. M., & Doan, K. (2014). Selection pressures on special education teacher preparation: Issues shaping our future. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(1), 9-20. doi.org/10.1177/0888406413513273 Etscheidt, S., Curran, C. M., & Sawyer, C. M. (2012). Promoting reflection in teacher preparation programs: A multilevel model. Teacher education and Special education, 35(1), 7-26. doi: 10.1177/0888406411420887 Gersten, R., Keating, T., Yovanoff, P., & Harniss, M. K. (2001). Working in special education: Factors that enhance special educators' intent to stay. Exceptional children, 67(4), 549-567. doi: 10.1177/001440290106700408 Holdheide, L. (2015). Same debate, new opportunity: designing teacher evaluation systems that promote and support educators in practices tha