Journals / Journal of Scientific Reports-A / 2003 / Sayı: 005

THE EFFECT ON GREENHOUSE AIR CONDITIONS AND HEATING ECONOMY OF DIFFERENT GREENHOUSE DESIGNS

FARKLI SERA KONSTRUKSiYONLARININ SERA ORTAM KOSULLARINA VE lSI EKONOMISINE ETKILERININ ARASTIRILMASI

Pages
153–162
Publication Date
2003-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the greenhouse reducedvolume 30%, temperature increased 9%, relative humidity reduced %12 and fuelneed reduced 24% according to traditional greenhouse.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Currently, high heating cost in greenhouses is a main drawback for their widely use.The heating cost has the highest percentage of the total production cost.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In thisresearch, in order to reduce the heating cost four greenhouses which are 36 m2 wereconstructed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the greenhouse reducedvolume 30%, temperature increased 9%, relative humidity reduced %12 and fuelneed reduced 24% according to traditional greenhouse.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sera · Bagil nern · Sıcaklık

Abstract

Currently, high heating cost in greenhouses is a main drawback for their widely use.The heating cost has the highest percentage of the total production cost. In thisresearch, in order to reduce the heating cost four greenhouses which are 36 m2 wereconstructed. One of these greenhouses had a fixed volume while the others werereduced by 10%, 20% and 30% (variable vertically). The effect of variable volumeon the temperature, relative humidity and fuel economy in the greenhouse wasinvestigated.Two different experiment periods showed that volume control affected temperature,relative humidity and fuel need in the greenhouses. In the greenhouse reducedvolume 30%, temperature increased 9%, relative humidity reduced %12 and fuelneed reduced 24% according to traditional greenhouse.

Özet

Gunurnuzdc, seracihgm ekonomik olarak yaprlmasnu engelleyen en buyuk etken rsitmagiderlerinin yuksek olrnasrdir., lsitma giderleri, toplam sera giderleri icinde en yuksek payasahiptir. Bu arasnrmada, isitma giderlerinin azalulmasi arnaciyla her birisi 36 m2 olan; birisisabit, digerleri de hacmi %10 orarunda kucultulrnus sabit sera, hacmi %20 oranmdakucultulmus sabit sera ve hacmi %30 oranina kadar kuculebilen hacim kontrollU-hareketliseralar kurulrnustur. Calisrnada tasanrm yaprlrrns bu seralardaki hacim degisirninin; sera icisicakhgma, sera ici bagil nemine ve yakit ekonomisine etkisi arasunlrmstir.iki ayn donemde yapilan denerneler sonucunda; sera hacmi kuculdukce, sera ici ortalarnastcakhgrrn artnrdigi, ortalama bagrl nernin ise azaldrgi belirlenrnistir. Sabit seraya gore, %30oranmda hacim kucultmeli sera icin bll oranlarm, sirasiyla %9 ve %12 oldugu, bununsonucunda ise bu serada %24 oranmda lSI ekonornisinin saglandigi ortaya konmustur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRATLI, N., IŞIK, A., GÜLENÇ, B. (2003). THE EFFECT ON GREENHOUSE AIR CONDITIONS AND HEATING ECONOMY OF DIFFERENT GREENHOUSE DESIGNS. Journal of Scientific Reports-A, Sayı: 005, 153–162. https://ajindex.com/articles/779465

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Anonymous, Vll. Bes Ytlltk Kalkinma Plant.Ortu Alti Sebzeciligi Ozel Ihtisas Grubu Komisyon Raporu, Seraciltk Arastirma Enstitusu, Antalya (1993), 36-66
  2. Anonymous, Tarist lstatistiksel Paket Programs, Ege Universitesi Ziraat Fakultesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bolumu, (1993) BomovaliZMiR. [3]Ba~yetinyelik, A., and Ozturk, H.H., Seralarda Ortam Kontrolii, II. Seracihk Sempozyumu, (1997) Simav/KUT AHY A, 67-68. [4]Bailley, B.1., The Evaloution of Thermal Screens in Glasshouse 011 Commerical Nursries, Acta Horticulturae, Vol. 115, (198J) 633-640
  3. Mills, P.1.W., Smiths, I.E., and Marais, G., Greenhouse Construction Desingn, Acta Horticulrurae, 181, (1990) 84-87
  4. Macit, E., Seralarda Domates Yetistiriciligi, II. Seracihk Sempozyumu, Cilt I, (1997), Simav/KUT AHY A, 77-84
  5. Sevican, A., Ortu AlII Sebzeciligi, Ege Universitesi Ziraat Fakultesi Yaymlan, (1999), BornovaliZMiR,, 19-67. [8]Cockshull, K.E., The Unflance of Energy Conservation 011 Crop Productivity, Acta Horticulturae, Vol. 9, (1989),121-129
  6. Ktratlt, N., Celik konstruksiyonlu hacim kontrollu sera tasarimi, enerji korunumu ve isttma borulartnin korozyon ozelliklerinin arasttrtlmasi, Doktora Tezi, Gazi Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu, (2003), Sthhtye-Ankara,84-88
  7. Demir, Y, Baklaya, A., Cernek, B., Seralarda cevre bitki iliskisi ve cevre sartlartntn etkisi, II seracrlik sempozyumu, (1997), Simav/KOTAHY A,21-24
  8. Tuzel, Y., Sera Sebze Yetistiriciliginde Enerji Koruma Sistemleri Uzerine bir Arastirma, Doktora Tezi, rge Universitesi Ziraat Fakultesi, (1989), BornovaliZMiR,36-42
  9. Karunc.A, Tarim ve kay isleri bakanligi sera tiplerinin Antalya kosullartnda yeterliligi, Yiiksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstiuisli, Tanmsal Yapilar ve Sulama Anabilim Dalr, (1993), Ankara, 72-79
  10. Harzadm, G., Sera yaptsal teknolojilerindeki istenen ozellikler, II Seracihk Sempozyumu, (1997), Simav/Kutahya, 78-81.