SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Scientific Reports-A / 2011 / Sayı: 025

USAGE OF ANP AND VIKOR METHODS FOR SUPPLIER ASSESSMENT AND SELECTION PROBLEM OF A COMPANY

BİR İŞLETMENİN TEDARİKÇİ DEĞERLENDİRME VE SEÇİM PROBLEMİNİN ÇÖZÜMÜNDE AAS VE VIKOR YÖNTEMLERİNİN KULLANILMASI

İmre Ferah Göktürk
Avni Yücel Eryılmaz
Bahadır Yörür
Yıldız Yuluğkural
Pages
61–74
Publication Date
2011-08-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

VIKOR solutions are obtained for the different values of the maximum group utility which has taken into consideration to have a compromise solution, and results are interpreted.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Supplier assessment and selection problem is an important milestone to perform business plan for a company.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to order and evaluate 14 suppliers of a machine manufacturer company by using VIKOR method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:VIKOR solutions are obtained for the different values of the maximum group utility which has taken into consideration to have a compromise solution, and results are interpreted.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tedarikçi Değerlendirme ve Seçimi · Analitik Ağ Süreci (AAS) Yöntemi · VIKOR Yöntemi

Abstract

Supplier assessment and selection problem is an important milestone to perform business plan for a company. Therefore, to solve this important problem in supply chain management brings competitiveness to the company. Supplier assessment and selection problem based on multi criteria decision making problem is tried to solve by numerous different method and approaches until today. The aim of this study is to order and evaluate 14 suppliers of a machine manufacturer company by using VIKOR method. Analytic Network Process (ANP) method was used due to the interactions among criteria which has an important role to weight evaluation criteria in VIKOR method. VIKOR solutions are obtained for the different values of the maximum group utility which has taken into consideration to have a compromise solution, and results are interpreted.

Özet

Tedarikçi değerlendirme ve seçim problemi, işletmelerin ileriye dönük planlarının gerçekleştirilmesi açısından önem taşımaktadır. Tedarik zinciri yönetimindeki bu önemli sorunun üstesinden gelmek ise işletmelere önemli ölçüde rekabet avantajı sağlamaktadır. Çok kriterli bir karar verme problemi olan tedarikçi değerlendirme ve seçim problemi, günümüze kadar çok sayıda değişik yöntem ve yaklaşımların kullanılmasıyla çözülmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, VIKOR yöntemi kullanımı ile, makine imalatı gerçekleştiren bir işletmenin 14 tedarikçisi arasında bir değerlendirme ve sıralama gerçekleştirmektir. VIKOR yönteminin çözümünde önemli bir rol oynayan değerlendirme kriterlerinin ağırlıklandırılmasında, kriterlerin karşılıklı etkileşim içermesinden dolayı Analitik Ağ Süreci (AAS) yönteminden yararlanılmıştır. Uzlaşık çözümün elde edilmesinde dikkate alınan maksimum grup faydasının farklı değerleri için ayrı ayrı VIKOR çözümleri elde edilmiş ve sonuçlar yorumlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Göktürk, İ. F., Eryılmaz, A. Y., Yörür, B., Yuluğkural, Y. (2011). USAGE OF ANP AND VIKOR METHODS FOR SUPPLIER ASSESSMENT AND SELECTION PROBLEM OF A COMPANY. Journal of Scientific Reports-A, Sayı: 025, 61–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/779166

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. S. Önüt, S.S. Kara, and E. Işık, “Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: A case study for a telecommunication company”, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 3887-3895 (2009)
  2. D. Özgen, S. Önüt, B. Gülsün, U.R. Tuzkaya, and G. Tuzkaya, “A two-phase possibilistic linear programming methodology for multi-objective supplier evaluation and order allocation problems”, Information Sciences, 178, 485-500 (2008)
  3. S.S. Kara, “Supplier selection with an integrated methodology in unknown environment”, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 2133-2139 (2011)
  4. C. Gencer and D. Gurpınar, “Analytic network process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm”, Applied Mathematical Modeling, 31, 2475-2486 (2007)
  5. L. Boer, E. Labro, and P. Morlacchi, “A review of methods supporting supplier selection”, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7(2), 75-89 (2001)
  6. K.L. Choy, W.B. Lee, and V. Lo, “Design of a case based intelligent supplier relationship management system-the integration of supplier rating system and product coding system”, Expert Systems with Applications, 25, 87-100 (2003)
  7. R. Cook, “Case-based reasoning systems in purchasing: Applications and development”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 33(1), 32-39 (1997)
  8. Z. Degraeve, E. Labro, and F. Roodhooft, “An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective”, European Journal Operation Research, 125, 34-58 (2000)
  9. S. Talluri and R. Narasimhan, “Vendor evaluation with performance variability: a max–min approach”, European Journal Operation Research, 146, 543-552 (2003)
  10. J. Zhu, “A buyer–seller game model for selection and negotiation of purchasing bids: extensions and new models”, European Journal Operation Research, 134, 150-156 (2004)
  11. S.H. Ghodspour and C. O’Brien, “The total cost of logistics in supplier selection under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint”, International Journal Production Economics, 73, 15-27 (2001)
  12. C. Hinkle, P.J. Robinson, and P.E. Green, “Vendor evaluation using clusters analysis”, Journal of Purchasing, 5(3), 49-58 (1969)
  13. B. Ronen and D. Trietsch, “A decision support system for purchasing management of large projects”, Operations Research, 36(6), 882-890 (1998)
  14. V. Albino and A. Garavelli, “A neural network application to subcontractor rating in construction firms”, International