Journals / Journal of Scientific Reports-A / 2020 / Sayı: 045

THE EFFECT OF PH AND CURRENT DENSITY IN THE REMOVAL OF ALUMINUM COBALT, CHROMIUM, AND ZINC FROM METAL PROCESSING WASTEWATER BY ELECTROCOAGULATION METHOD

Pages
225–235
Publication Date
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While the maximum removal efficiency was achieved with a current density of 50 A/m2 for Cr, the efficiency increases were more obvious with increasing current density for Al, Co, and Zn.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effects of initial pH (3, 5, 7, 9) and current density (25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200 A/m2) on the removal of Al3+, Co2+, Cr6+ and Zn2+ions from metal processing wastewater by electrocoagulation method were examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All of the removal efficiencies were insignificant at the initial pH value of 1.32.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While the maximum removal efficiency was achieved with a current density of 50 A/m2 for Cr, the efficiency increases were more obvious with increasing current density for Al, Co, and Zn.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Electrocoagulation · Current Density · Metal Processing

Abstract

In this study, the effects of initial pH (3, 5, 7, 9) and current density (25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200 A/m2) on the removal of Al3+, Co2+, Cr6+ and Zn2+ions from metal processing wastewater by electrocoagulation method were examined. Iron and stainless steel electrodes were used as anode and cathode materials. All of the removal efficiencies were insignificant at the initial pH value of 1.32. As the initial pH values were increased the removal efficiencies increased in all stages of the experiments. With increasing the pH from 3 to 9, removal efficiencies increased from 67.4% to 99.2% for Al, from 18.1% to 99.7% for Co, and from 36.6% to 99.9% for Zn, while removal efficiencies for Cr were over 99% for each pH. Although the inital concentration of Co was relatively low, it was only removed with over 99% efficiency at long electrocoagulation times or at relatively high final pH values. A similar trend was determined for Zn, but this case was explained by a relatively high concentration of Zn. While the maximum removal efficiency was achieved with a current density of 50 A/m2 for Cr, the efficiency increases were more obvious with increasing current density for Al, Co, and Zn.

🔖

Cite This Article

BEYAZIT, N., TURK, B. (2020). THE EFFECT OF PH AND CURRENT DENSITY IN THE REMOVAL OF ALUMINUM COBALT, CHROMIUM, AND ZINC FROM METAL PROCESSING WASTEWATER BY ELECTROCOAGULATION METHOD. Journal of Scientific Reports-A, Sayı: 045, 225–235. https://ajindex.com/articles/779010

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Vasudevan, S., J. Lakshmi, J. and Sozhan, G., (2012), Simultaneous removal of Co, Cu, and Cr from water by electrocoagulation, Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 94, 1930-1940
  2. Fu, F. and Wang, Q., (2011), Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review, Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 407-418
  3. Heidmann, I. and Calmano, W., (2008), Removal of Cr(VI) from model wastewaters by electrocoagulation with Fe electrodes, Separation and Purification Technology, 61 (1), 15-21
  4. Matlock, M., Howerton, B., and Atwood, D., (2002), Chemical precipitation of heavy metals from acid mine drainage, Water Research 36, 4757-4764
  5. Inglezakis, V.J., Loizidou, M.D. and Grigoropoulou, H.P., (2002), Equilibrium and kinetic ion exchange studies of Pb2+, Cr3+, Fe3+ and Cu2+ on natural clinoptilolite, Water Research, 36, 2784-2792
  6. Hong, M., Yu, L.,Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Chen, Z., Dong, L., Zan, Q. and Li, R., (2019), Heavy metal adsorption with zeolites: The role of hierarchical pore architecture, Chemical Engineering Journal, 359, 363-372
  7. Sarioglu, M., Guler, U. and Beyazit, N., (2009), Removal of copper from aqueous solutions using biosolids, Desalination, 239, 167-174
  8. Blocher, C., Dorda, J., Mavrov, V., Chmiel, H., Lazaridis, N.K. and Matisc, K.A., (2003), Hybrid flotation—membrane filtration process for the removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater, Water Research, 37, 4018-4026
  9. Taseidifar, M., Makavipour, F., Pashley, R.M. and Rahman, A.F.M., (2017), Removal of heavy metal ions from water using ion flotation, Environmental Technology and Innovation, 8, 182-190
  10. Yadav, A., L. Singh, A. Mohanty, S. Satya and Sreekrishnan, T.R., (2012), Removal of various pollutants from wastewater by electrocoagulation using iron and aluminum electrode, Desalination and Water Treatment, 46, 352-358
  11. Al Aji, B., Yavuz, Y. and Koparal, S., (2012), Electrocoagulation of heavy metals containing model wastewater using monopolar iron electrodes. Separation and Purification Technology, 86, 248-254
  12. Wang, C. and Chou, W., (2009). Performance of COD removal from oxide chemical mechanical polishing wastewater using iron electrocoagulation, Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part, A44, 1289-1297
  13. Mansouri, K., Elsaid, K., Bedoui, A., Bensalah, N. And Abdel-Wahab, A., (2011), Application of electrochemically dissolved iron in the removal of tannic acid from water, Chemical Engineering Journal, 172, 970-976
  14. Ozyonar,