Journals / Journal of Scientific Reports-A / 2022 / Sayı: 049

LOCATION PROOFING USING VIDEO SIMILARITY

Pages
139–157
Publication Date
2022-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The indoor location test results of our prototype indicate that it can achieve a verification accuracy of 97.05% on average in 9.67 seconds.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With the increasing availability of mobile devices and technological improvements, location-based services have become a vital part of our everyday lives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, a layer of checks and verifications might be required to identify the user’s declared location authenticity, since it is possible to bypass GPS or any other indoor location detection solutions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The indoor location test results of our prototype indicate that it can achieve a verification accuracy of 97.05% on average in 9.67 seconds.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Location Proofing · Indoor Location Proofing · Video Similarity

Abstract

With the increasing availability of mobile devices and technological improvements, location-based services have become a vital part of our everyday lives. However, a layer of checks and verifications might be required to identify the user’s declared location authenticity, since it is possible to bypass GPS or any other indoor location detection solutions. Existing location proofing solutions mainly propose techniques requiring some sort of an infrastructure, such as access points and/or beacons, or a co-located prover, witnesses and verifier formation to prove the presence of the user. This paper proposes a location proofing solution using the video similarity technique, which is based on the comparison of visual similarities in video pairs to determine the surrounding environment without any infrastructural overhead. The indoor location test results of our prototype indicate that it can achieve a verification accuracy of 97.05% on average in 9.67 seconds.

🔖

Cite This Article

GEMİRTER, C. B., SERIF, T. (2022). LOCATION PROOFING USING VIDEO SIMILARITY. Journal of Scientific Reports-A, Sayı: 049, 139–157. https://ajindex.com/articles/778956

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Saroiu, S., & Wolman, A. (2009, February). Enabling new mobile applications with location proofs. In Proceedings of the 10th workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, 1-6
  2. Ferreira, J., & Pardal, M. L. (2018, November). Witness-based location proofs for mobile devices. In 2018 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA), IEEE, 1-4
  3. Kenan, M. (2021, April). Comparative analysis of localization techniques used in lbs. In 2021 5th International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC), IEEE, 300-304
  4. Martins, P., Abbasi, M., Sa, F., Celiclio, J., Morgado, F., & Caldeira, F. (2019). Intelligent beacon location and fingerprinting. Procedia Computer Science, 151, 9-16
  5. Alamleh, H., & AlQahtani, A. A. S. (2020, July). A cheat-proof system to validate GPS location data. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT), IEEE, 190-193
  6. Saroiu, S., and Wolman, A. (2019, February). Enabling new mobile applications with location proofs. In Proceedings of the 10th workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, 1-6
  7. Wang, X., Pande, A., Zhu, J., and Mohapatra, P. (2016). STAMP: Enabling privacy-preserving location proofs for mobile users. IEEE/ACM transactions on networking, 24(6), 3276-3289
  8. Zhu, Z., and Cao, G. (2011, April). Applaus: A privacy-preserving location proof updating system for location-based services. In 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, IEEE, 1889-1897
  9. Javali, C., Revadigar, G., Rasmussen, K. B., Hu, W., and Jha, S. (2016, November). I am alice, i was in wonderland: secure location proof generation and verification protocol. In 2016 IEEE 41st conference on local computer networks (LCN), IEEE, 477-485
  10. Davis, B., Chen, H., and Franklin, M. (2012, May). Privacy-preserving alibi systems. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security, 34-35
  11. Talasila, M., Curtmola, R., and Borcea, C. (2010, December). Link: Location verification through immediate neighbors knowledge. In International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking, and Services, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 210-223
  12. Gambs, S., Killijian, M. O., Roy, M., and Traoré, M. (2014, October). PROPS: A privacy-preserving location proof system. In 2014 IEEE 33rd International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, IEEE, 1-10
  13. Hasan, R., and Burns, R. (2011). Where have you b