SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Research in Veterinary Medicine / 2012 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Conditioning Methods For Farm Animals: A Mini Review

Çiftlik Hayvanlarında Şartlandırma Yöntemleri

Christopher A. VARNON
Abigail L. MARTİN
Charles I. ABRAMSON
Pages
1–10
Publication Date
2012-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Information on general resources is also provided.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This review briefly surveys the range of conditioning methods used in the study of learning for economically important farm animals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We begin by discussing the importance of conditioning methods, provide an overview of non-associative and associative learning and follow by showing how these methods are applied to chickens, cows, horses, goats and sheep.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Information on general resources is also provided.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Şartlandırma teknikleri · Çiftlik · hayvanları

Abstract

This review briefly surveys the range of conditioning methods used in the study of learning for economically important farm animals. We begin by discussing the importance of conditioning methods, provide an overview of non-associative and associative learning and follow by showing how these methods are applied to chickens, cows, horses, goats and sheep. Information on general resources is also provided.

Özet

Bu makalede ekonomik öneme sahip çiftlik hayvanlarının eğitilmesinde kullanılan şartlandırma metodları ele alınmıştır. Öncelikle şartlandırma yöntemlerinin önemi değerlendirilmiş, birarada-toplu yaşam ile ilişkili olan ve olmayan öğrenme konusunda bilgiler verilmiş ve ardından bu metodların tavuklarda, ineklerde, atlarda, keçilerde ve koyunlarda kullanımlarına ilişkin genel bir bakış açısı sunulmuştur. Makalede aynı zamanda genel araştırmalar hakkında da bilgilere yer verilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

VARNON, C. A., MARTİN, A. L., ABRAMSON, C. I. (2012). Conditioning Methods For Farm Animals: A Mini Review. Journal of Research in Veterinary Medicine, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 1–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/778667

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abramson, C. I., 1994. A Primer of Invertebrate Learning. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. Arnold, N.A., Ng, K.T., Jongman, E.C., Hems- worth, P.H., 2008. Avoidance of tape-recorded milking facility noise by dairy heifers in a Y maze choice task. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 109, 201-210.
  2. Beecroft, R.S., 1966. Classical conditioning. Psychonomic Press.
  3. Goleta, CA. Berkhoudt, H., van der Reijden, D., Meijmans, M., 1987. An automatic pellet dispensor for pre- cise control of feeding topography in granivorous birds. J Exp Anal Behav, 48, 435-438.
  4. Broder, J.M., MacFadden, A.J., Cosens, L.M., Rosenstein, D.S., Harrison, T.M., 2008. Use of positive reinforcement conditioning to monitor pregnancy in an unanesthetized snow leopard (Uncia uncia) via transabdominal ultrasound. Zoo Biol, 27, 78-85. de Ameida, M.B., Schild, A.L., Brasil, N.D.A., Quevedo, P.S., Fiss, L., Pfister J.A., Riet-Correa, F., 2009. Conditioned aversion in sheep induced by Baccharis coridifolia. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 117, 197-200.
  5. Dabrowska, B., Harmata, W., Lenkiewicz, Z., Schiffer, Z., Wojtusiak, R.J., 1981. Colour per- ception in cows. Behav Process, 6, 1-10.
  6. Dawkins, M.S., 2006. Through animal eyes: What behaviour tells us. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 100, 4-10.
  7. Dougherty, D.M., Lewis, P., 1991. Stimulus generalization, discrimination learning, and peak shift in horses. J Exp Anal Behav, 56, 97-104.
  8. Dougherty, D.M., Lewis, P., 1992. Matching by horses on several concurrent variable-interval schedules. Behav Process, 26, 69-76.
  9. Dougherty, D.M., Lewis, P., 1993. Generaliza- tion of a tactile stimulus in horses. J Exp Anal Behav, 59, 521-528.
  10. Ferguson, D.L., Rosales-Ruiz, J., 2001. Loading the problem loader: The effects of target training and shaping on trailer-loading behavior of horses. J App Behav Anal, 34, 409-424.
  11. Foster, T.M., Matthews, L.R., Temple, W., Pol- ing, A., 1997. Concurrent schedule performance in domestic goats: persistent undermatching. Be- hav Process, 40, 231-237.
  12. Foster, T.M., Temple, T., Robertson, B. Nair, V., Poling, A., 1996. Concurrent-schedule perfor- mance in dairy cows: Persistent undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav, 65, 57-80.
  13. Gabor, V., Gerken, M., 2012. Cognitive testing in horses using a computer based apparatus. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 139, 242-250.
  14. Greenberg, G., Haraway, M. M., 1998. Compara- tive psychology: A handbook. New York: Gar- land. Hanggi, E.B., 2003. Discrimination learning based in relative size concepts in horses (Equus caballus). Appl Anim Behav