Journals / Journal of Research in Veterinary Medicine / 2020 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1

Ultrasound follow-up of adhesions after one-step laparoscopic abomasopexy for correction of left displaced abomasum in cattle

Pages
15–20
Publication Date
2020-07-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Long follow-up studies are thought to be beneficial to determine the difference in adhesion thickness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of the ultrasound on the determination of the thickness of adhesion at the abomasopexy point in cows which had undergone one-step laparoscopic abomasopexy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Postoperative ultrasonographic examinations were carried out starting immediately after surgery (day 0), and on days 28, 90 and 120 by using a 5 MHz transducer frequency and also a linear transducer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Long follow-up studies are thought to be beneficial to determine the difference in adhesion thickness.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:LDA · one-step laparoscopic abomasopexy · ultrasound

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of the ultrasound on the determination of the thickness of adhesion at the abomasopexy point in cows which had undergone one-step laparoscopic abomasopexy. Ten Holstein cattle with left displaced abomasum (LDA) were included in the study. Animals were treated with one-step laparoscopic abomasopexy whilst standing. Postoperative ultrasonographic examinations were carried out starting immediately after surgery (day 0), and on days 28, 90 and 120 by using a 5 MHz transducer frequency and also a linear transducer. The thickness of the adhesion was measured between the abdominal wall and the abomasum. Ultrasonographic image revealed the area of fixation on day 0 as a mild distorted subcutaneous tissue. Heterogeneous hypo-echoic irregular-shaped mass (adhesion) was observed between the abomasum and abdominal wall on days 28, 90 and 120. Average thickness significantly (p <0.05) increased from day 0 to day 28, but tended to decrease afterwards. The average thickness of adhesion at the abomasopexy point was recorded as 20.47, 22.82, 22.34 and 21.92 mm on days on 0, 28, 90 and 120, respectively. The ultrasonographic examination can diagnose and measure the adhesions between the abomasum and the abdominal wall. During the study period, the adhesion formation was followed up to the 120th day, and in this period the thickness of the adhesion tended to decrease. Long follow-up studies are thought to be beneficial to determine the difference in adhesion thickness.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYALP, G. C., ŞEN, İ. A., SATAR, N. Y. G., SERT, S. T. (2020). Ultrasound follow-up of adhesions after one-step laparoscopic abomasopexy for correction of left displaced abomasum in cattle. Journal of Research in Veterinary Medicine, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1, 15–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/778567

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Al-Bayati A. Development of abdominal adhesions after laparoscopic abomasopexy. (PhD Thesis) College of Veterinary Medicine, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen 2011:38-82
  2. Babkine M, Desrochers A. Laparoscopic Surgery in Adult Cattle. Vet Clin Food Anim. 2005;21:251–279
  3. Babkine M, Desrochers A, Bouré L, Hélie P. Ventral laparoscopic abomasopexy on adult cows. Can Vet Journal. 2006;47:343–348
  4. Barisani C. Evoluzione della tecnica di Janowitz per la risoluzione della dislocazione abomasale sinistra secondo Barisani. Summa 2004;5:35-39
  5. Braun U. Review ultrasonography in gastrointestinal disease in cattle. Vet Journal. 2003;166:112–124
  6. Christiansen K. Laparoskopisch kontrollierte Operation des nach links verlagerten Labmagens (Janowitz-Operation) ohne Ablegen des Patienten. Tierarztl Prax. 2004;32:118-121
  7. Connell J. Four Methods of Surgical Correction of Abomasal Displacement in the Cow. Iowa State University Vet. 1976;38:21-24
  8. Fecteau G. Peritonitis in the Ruminant. In: Large Animal Internal Medicine. 4th ed. Mosby, Elsevier, St Louis, 2008:850-855
  9. Freick M, Sieber I, Endtmann A, Passarge U, Passarge O. Laparoscopic reposition of the displaced abomasum in a dairy herd in Saxony (Germany) - a case series (Article in German). Tierärztliche Umschau. 2013;68: 311 – 321
  10. Grechenig W, Clement HG, Fellinger M, Schleifer P, Tesch PN. Ultrasound imaging and localization of metal implants. A clinical study. Unfallchirurg. 1996;22:117-123
  11. Janowitz H. Laparoscopic reposition and fixation of the left displaced abomasum in cattle. Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 1998;26(6):308–313
  12. Mulon PY, Babkine M, Desrochers A. Ventral laparoscopic abomasopexy in 18 cattle with displaced abomasum. Vet Surg. 2006;33:347-355
  13. Newman KD, Anderson DE, Silveira F. One-step laparoscopic abomasopexy for correction of left-sided displacement of the abomasum in dairy cows. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005;227:1142-1147
  14. Newman KD, Harvey D, Roy JP. Minimally invasive field abomasopexy techniques for correction and fixation of left displacement of the abomasum in dairy cows. Vet Clin N Am-Food A. Philadelphia, 2008;24(2):359-382
  15. Ok M, Arıcan M, Turgut K. Ultrasonographic findings in cows with left and right displacement of abomasum. Revue Méd Vét. 2002;15:15-18
  16. Perotta JH, Ollhoff RD, Naylor Lisboa JA, de Barros Filho IR. One-step laparoscopy for the correction of left abomasal displacement in high-yielding Holstein dair