Journals / Journal of New Results in Science / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of the K factor in different areas on the slope

Pages
46–53
Publication Date
2021-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The erodibility value of the region is between 0.07 and 0.12 t ha-1 Mj mm-1, and it was determined that soils are classified in the soil class, which is sensitive to moderate erosion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Erosion is among the leading factors threatening our sources of soil and water.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With this aim, three-times repeated deteriorated surface soil samples of 0-20 cm depth were taken from the peak, shoulder, ridge, face, and inch (finger) regions of the slope area, and they were analysed in the laboratory.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The erodibility value of the region is between 0.07 and 0.12 t ha-1 Mj mm-1, and it was determined that soils are classified in the soil class, which is sensitive to moderate erosion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:USLE · Soil Erosion · K factor

Abstract

Erosion is among the leading factors threatening our sources of soil and water. The use of soil susceptibility indices to determine erosion and risk situations is vital, especially in erosion studies. The susceptibility of soil to erosion is the resistance of soil against decomposition due to some external forces. Carried out around Tokat-Tekneli village, the research aims to determine the erodibility factor (K) of the soil by its physical and chemical qualities in different slope segments of a field which is applied wheat-fallowing planting watch and has a convex slope in the study area. With this aim, three-times repeated deteriorated surface soil samples of 0-20 cm depth were taken from the peak, shoulder, ridge, face, and inch (finger) regions of the slope area, and they were analysed in the laboratory. With the formulation of the K factor, the soil erodibility value of each soil sample was calculated. The erodibility value of the region is between 0.07 and 0.12 t ha-1 Mj mm-1, and it was determined that soils are classified in the soil class, which is sensitive to moderate erosion.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, S., AKDOĞAN, Y., OGUZ, İ., KOÇYİĞİT, R. (2021). Comparison of the K factor in different areas on the slope. Journal of New Results in Science, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 46–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/777807

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. J L. Wang, J. Huang, Y. Du, Y. Hu, P. Han, Dynamic Assessment of Soil Erosion Risk Using Landsat TM, and HJ Satelite Data in Danjiangkou Area, China. Journal of Remote Sensing, 5(4), (2013) 3826–3848.
  2. I. A. Abdulfatai, I. A. Okunlola, W. G. Akande, L. O Momoh, K. O. Ibrahim, Review of Gully erosion in Nigeria: Causes, Impacts, and Possible Solutions, Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics, 2(3), (2014) 125–129.
  3. D. Pimentel, N. Kounang, Ecology of Soil Erosion in Ecosystems, Ecosystems, 1(5), (1998) 416–426.
  4. G. Gunawan, S. Dwita, S. Herr, W. Sulostiowemi, Soil Erosion Estimation based on GIS and Remote Sensing for Supporting Integrated Water Resources Conservation Management, International Journal of Technology, 2(1), (2013) 147–156.
  5. H. Cebel, S. Akgül, O. Doğan, F. Elbaşı, Erodibility “K” Factor of Great Soil Groups in Turkey, Soil-Water Journal, 2(1), (2013) 30–45.
  6. N. J. Quintan, V. G. P. Batista, L. N. Marx, Silva, J. Davies. Erosion Model Testing - Are Doing Enough? Global Symposıum on Soil Erosion Proceedings, 2019 pp. 180–184.
  7. N. K. Aslan, M. Tekiner, Assessment of Irrigation Practices of Farmers Receiving Water from Open-Canal and Piped Irrigation Networks, Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 5(9), (2017) 1066–1070.
  8. S. Demir, İ. Oğuz, E. Özer, Estimation of Soil Losses in a Slope Area of Tokat Province through USLE and WEPP Model, Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 6(12), (2018) 1838–1843.
  9. E. K. Kwaghe, A. M. Saddiq, R.I. Solomon, S.A. Musa, Integrated Nutrient Management on Soil Properties and Nutrient Uptake by Red Onion, Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 5(5), (2017) 471–475.
  10. G. R. Foster, L. D. Meyer, A Closed-form Soil Erosion Equation for Upland Areas, Sedimentation: Symposium to Honor Professor H. A. Einstein, H. W. Shen, ed., Fort Collins, Colo., 12.1, (1972) 12.9. İ. Oğuz, A. Durak, The Sensitivity Assessment of the Basin Soils to Erosion and Some Properties of the Çekerek Basin Large Soil Groups and Water Erosion Relations, Reports on the findings of soil and water resource research, Ankara, 1998.
  11. V. Bagarello, C. Di Stefano, V. Ferro, G. Giordano, M. Iovino, V. Pampalone, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 28, (2012) 199–206.
  12. K. G. Renard, G. R. Foster, G. A. Weesies, D. K. McCool, D. C. Yoder, Guide. Conserv. Plan. RUSLE. (1997).
  13. L. M. Risse, M. A. Nearing, A. D. Nicks, J. M. Laflen, Soil Science Society America Journal. 3, (1993) 825–833.
  14. J. Padhye, V. Firoiu, and