Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2018 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Biosurgery: utility in chronic wound

Biyocerrahi: kronik yara bakımındaki yeri

Pages
19–21
Publication Date
2018-04-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For now, whole effect mechanisms remain unclear and this therapy is not used as a single treatment method; it is actually a part of multidisciplinary approach to wound care.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Biosurgery or maggot debridement therapy or larval therapy is a complementary – integrative medicinal method that it has proven utilities especially in chronic wound care.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The method nearly provides every activity desired from a wound care.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For now, whole effect mechanisms remain unclear and this therapy is not used as a single treatment method; it is actually a part of multidisciplinary approach to wound care.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Lucilia sericata · kronik yara .bakımı · larva terapi

Abstract

Biosurgery or maggot debridement therapy or larval therapy is a complementary – integrative medicinal method that it has proven utilities especially in chronic wound care. The method nearly provides every activity desired from a wound care. Its modes of action can be divided into four major titles; i) Mechanic debridement, ii) Antimicrobial action, iii) Directing the tissue to wound healing, iv) Biofilm degradation. Furthermore, many isolated proteins from maggots showing various activities give a potential for future drugs. For now, whole effect mechanisms remain unclear and this therapy is not used as a single treatment method; it is actually a part of multidisciplinary approach to wound care.

Özet

Biyocerrahi veya maggot debritman tedavisi veya larval terapi faydası özellikle kronik yara bakımında kanıtlanmış bir tamamlayıcı tıp uygulamasıdır. Uygulama neredeyse kronik yara bakımından istenen tüm nitelikleri taşımaktadır. Etki mekanizması temelde dört bölümde incelenebilir; i) Mekanik debritman, ii) Antimikrobiyal etki, iii) Yara iyileşmesini uyarma, iv) Biyofilm yıkımı. Maggotlardan izole edilen çok sayıda protein yeni ilaçların üretilmesinde ciddi potansiyel taşımaktadır. Şu an için, bu uygulamanın etki mekanizmaları tamamen aydınlatılamamıştır ve uygulama salt bir tedavi yöntemi olarak değerlendirilmemekte; aslen, kronik yara bakımına çok disiplinli bir yaklaşımın parçası olarak sunulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SIĞ, A. K. (2018). Biosurgery: utility in chronic wound. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 19–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/777142

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Sherman RA, Hall M, Thomas S. Medicinal maggots: an ancient remedy for some contemporary afflictions. Annu Rev Entomol 2000; 45(1): 55-81
  2. Sherman RA, Wyle FA. Low-cost, low-maintenance rearing of maggots in hospitals, clinics, and schools. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1996; 54(1): 38-41
  3. Stoddard S, Sherman R., Mason B, Pelsang D, Sherman R. Maggot debridement therapy. An alternative treatment for nonhealing ulcers. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1995; 85(4): 218-21
  4. Sherman RA, Mumcuoglu KY, Grassberger M, Tantawi TI. Maggot Therapy. In: Grassberger M, Sherman RA, Gileva OS, Kim CMH, Mumcuoglu KY (eds). Biotherapy-history, principles and practice: A practical guide to the diagnosis and treatment of disease using living organisms. Springer Science & Business Media, Amsterdam 2013; pp. 5-29
  5. Fleischmann W, Grassberger M, Sherman RA. Maggot therapy: A handbook of maggot-assisted wound healing. Thieme Publification, London, 2004
  6. Trøstrup H, Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Møller K, Høiby N, Moser C. What Is New in the Understanding of Non Healing Wounds Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Therapies. Ulcers 2013; 8: 1-6
  7. Sood A, Granick MS, Tomaselli NL. Wound dressings and comparative effectiveness data. Adv Wound Care 2014; 3(8): 511-529
  8. Nunan R., Harding KG, Martin P. Clinical challenges of chronic wounds: searching for an optimal animal model to recapitulate their complexity. Dis Model Mech 2014; 7(11): 1205-1213
  9. Cazander G, Jukema GN, Nibbering PH. Complement activation and inhibition in wound healing. Clin Dev Immunol 2012; 8: 1-14
  10. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Aster JC. Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease, 9th Ed., Elsevier Publification, London, 2015
  11. Nathan C, Ding A. Nonresolving inflammation. Cell 2010; 140(6): 871-882
  12. Van der Plas MJA. Effect of maggot secretions on microbiological, haemotological and immunological processes. Maggot Therapy's Modes of Action. EZ Leiden, Leiden University Publification 2009; pp. 9-35
  13. Pöppel AK, Vogel H, Wiesner J, Vilcinskas A. Antimicrobial peptides expressed in medicinal maggots of the blow fly Lucilia sericata show combinatorial activity against bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015; 59(5): 2508-2514
  14. Mumcuoglu KY. Clinical applications for maggots in wound care. Am J Clin Dermatol 2001; 2(4): 219-227
  15. Pöppel AK, Kahl M, Baumann A, Wiesner J, Gokcen A, Beckert A. A Jonah-like chymotrypsin from the therapeutic maggot Lucilia sericata plays a role in wound debridement and coagulat