Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2023 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 6

Evaluation of one-point fixation surgery with computer-aided root mean square deviation in zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures

Pages
1393–1397
Publication Date
2023-10-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides, in accordance with the recent literature, this study might pay the way for future studies that would increase the usage of the one-point fixation method conducted on larger case series, as this method prevents lower eyelid complications without a visible scar.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: Our paper aimed to present the results of the one-point fixation method in zygomaticomaxillary fractures by computer-aided mirror image superimposition with root mean square (RMS) deviation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: One-point fixation performed zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture patients (n=18) by one surgeon were included in our study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides, in accordance with the recent literature, this study might pay the way for future studies that would increase the usage of the one-point fixation method conducted on larger case series, as this method prevents lower eyelid complications without a visible scar.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Maxillofacial surgery · facial fractures · 3D imaging

Abstract

Aims: Our paper aimed to present the results of the one-point fixation method in zygomaticomaxillary fractures by computer-aided mirror image superimposition with root mean square (RMS) deviation. Methods: One-point fixation performed zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture patients (n=18) by one surgeon were included in our study. Virtual 3D data of preoperative and postoperative CT-scan images was obtained by Slicer software. Sagittal plan mirror image superpositioning were used to obtain RMS data by Slicer. Mirror image superimposition of the undamaged side to the broken side in preoperative CT-scan imaging was referred as group B or broken group. Superposition of the repaired side’s postoperative imaging to the preoperative broken side was measured as group R or repair group in order to examine zygomatic bone’s postoperative spatial location. Superpositioned mirror 3D images of the non-traumatic side onto post-fixation 3D in postoperative data was measured as group M or mirror group. RMS deviation values of the groups obtained by Slicer were statistically compared. Results: Shapiro-Wilk test of groups were demonstrated normal distribution of the data for each group with no difference (p>0.05). In order to compare between groups, paired t-test covariance analysis were shown statistically similar data distrubition between experimental groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Considering the nature of maxillofacial surgery, which disapproves even millimetric errors, we believe that the mean square root deviation will become standard as it allows three-dimensional evaluation and precise mathematical measurements. Besides, in accordance with the recent literature, this study might pay the way for future studies that would increase the usage of the one-point fixation method conducted on larger case series, as this method prevents lower eyelid complications without a visible scar.

🔖

Cite This Article

OKYAY, M. F. (2023). Evaluation of one-point fixation surgery with computer-aided root mean square deviation in zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 6, 1393–1397. https://ajindex.com/articles/969271

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Schneider M, Besmens IS, Luo Y, et al. Surgical management of isolated orbital floor and zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures with focus on surgical approaches and complications. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2020;54(4):200-206. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2020.1746664. Wang HD, Dillon J. Contemporary management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Semin Plast Surg. 2021;35(4):256-262. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735812.
  2. Gadkari N, Bawane S, Chopra R, et al. Comparative evaluation ofpoint vs 3-point fixation in the treatment of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures - a systematic review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019;47(10):1542-1550. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.009. Knoops PG, Beaumont CA, Borghi A, et al. Comparison of three-dimensional scanner systems for craniomaxillofacial imaging. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70(4):441-449. doi: 10.1016/j. bjps.2016.12.015. Sozzi D, Gibelli D, Canzi G, et al. Assessing the precision of posttraumatic orbital reconstruction through "mirror" orbital superimposition: a novel approach for testing the anatomical accuracy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018;46(8):1258-1262. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.040. Moghaddam MB, Brown TM, Clausen A, et al. Outcome analysis after helmet therapy using 3D photogrammetry in patients with deformational plagiocephaly: the role of root mean square. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(2):159-65. doi: 10.1016/j. bjps.2013.09.036. Linden OE, He JK, Morrison CS, et al. The relationship between age and facial asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(5):1145-1152. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004831. Shokri T, Sokoya M, Cohn JE, et al. Single-point fixation for noncomminuted zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures-a 20-year experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78(5):778-781. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.12.030. Lee KS, Do GC, Shin JB, et al. One-point versus two-point fixation in the management of zygoma complex fractures. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2022;23(4):171-177. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2022.00164. Kim JH, Lee JH, Hong SM, et al. The effectiveness of 1-point fixation for zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(9):828-832. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2012.1815. Hsu PJ, Denadai R, Pai BCJ, et al. Outcome of facial contour asymmetry after conventional two-dimensional versus computer-assisted three-dimensional planning in cleft orthognathic surgery. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):2346. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58682-4.
  3. Bengtsson M, Wall G, Greiff L, Rasmusson L. Treatment outcome in orthognathic