Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane block for adult cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Pages
150–155
Publication Date
2022-01-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The duration before first analgesic (mean±SD: 459.2±92.8 min.) of the ESP group was statistically longer than those in the control group (mean±SD: 142.0±56.6 min.) (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: There are few randomized controlled trials examining the effectiveness of bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP) with patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: 54 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with open median sternotomy under general anesthesia between May 2020 and June 2021 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The duration before first analgesic (mean±SD: 459.2±92.8 min.) of the ESP group was statistically longer than those in the control group (mean±SD: 142.0±56.6 min.) (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Erector spinae plane block · Cardiac surgery · Postoperative pain

Abstract

Introduction: There are few randomized controlled trials examining the effectiveness of bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP) with patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The effect of bilateral ESP block on postoperative pain levels and analgesic consumption for patients undergoing open-heart surgery was examined in this single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Material and Method: 54 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with open median sternotomy under general anesthesia between May 2020 and June 2021 were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups, each consisting of 27 patients, one with 40 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and bilateral ESP block, the other with no block implementation (control group). Demographic data, operation type, length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), numerical rating scale (NRS) values in the first 24 hours after extubation, and morphine consumption values of the patients were recorded for the study. Results: In the study, 4 patients were excluded from follow-up due to prolonged intubation in the postoperative period. The data of a total of 50 patients (ESP group n=25; Control group n=25) were analyzed. The duration before first analgesic (mean±SD: 459.2±92.8 min.) of the ESP group was statistically longer than those in the control group (mean±SD: 142.0±56.6 min.) (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜVEN, B. B., ERTÜRK, T., ERSOY, A. (2022). Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane block for adult cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 150–155. https://ajindex.com/articles/776663

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 2017; 152: 292-8.
  2. Markham T, Wegner R, Hernandez N, et al. Assessment of a multimodal analgesia protocol to allow the implementation of enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery: retrospective analysis of patient outcomes. J Clin Anesth 2019; 54: 76-80.
  3. Guay J, Kopp S. Epidural analgesia for adults undergoing cardiac surgery with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 3: CD006715. Sun L, Li Q, Wang Q, Ma F, Han W, Wang M. Bilateral thoracic paravertebral block combined with general anesthesia vs. general anesthesia for patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a feasibility study. BMC Anesthesiol 2019; 19: 101. Mehta Y, Arora D, Sharma KK, Mishra Y, Wasir H, Trehan N. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural and paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Card Anaesth 2008; 11: 91-6.
  4. Kot P, Rodriguez P, Granell M, et al. The erector spinae plane block: a narrative review. Korean J Anesthesiol 2019; 72: 209-20.
  5. Nagaraja PS, Ragavendran S, Singh NG, et al. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural analgesia with bilateral erector spinae plane block for perioperative pain management in cardiac surgery. Ann Card Anaesth 2018; 21: 323-7.
  6. Bigeleisen PE, Goehner N. Novel approaches in pain management in cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2015; 28: 89-94.
  7. Naveed A, Azam H, Murtaza HG, et al. Incidence and risk factors of pulmonary complications after cardiopulmonary bypass. Pakistan J Med Sci 2017; 33: 993–6.
  8. Khera T, Murugappan KR, Leibowitz A, et al. Ultrasound-Guided Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 35: 896-903.
  9. Doğan Bakı E, Kavrut Ozturk N, Ayoğlu RU, Emmiler M, Karslı B, Uzel H. Effects of parasternal block on acute and chronic pain in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery. Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2016; 20: 205-12.
  10. Macaire P, Ho N, Nguyen T, et al. Ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic erector spinae plane block within an enhanced recovery program is associated with decreased opioid consumption and improved patient postoperative rehabilitation after open cardiac surgery-a patient-matched, controlled before-and-after study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 33: 1659-67.
  11. Krishna SN, Chauhan