Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 5

Correction: Can L3 lumbar vertebral body CT density reflect age?

Can L3 lumbar vertebral body CT density reflect age?

Serdar Sipahioğlu(S.B Ankara Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Radyoloji Kliniği)0000-0002-5074-5620
Fatih Işık(S.B Erzurum Şehir Hastanesi, Radyoloji Kliniği)0000-0002-3030-6794
Ali Köksal(Atılım University, Vocational School of Health Services, Radiology Department)0000-0002-4539-8636
Ahmet Koru(S.B Erzurum Şehir Hastanesi, Radyoloji Kliniği)0000-0001-8191-2324
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further validation in larger, diverse cohorts and integration with other biomarkers are needed to assess its utility in legal and administrative frameworks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: This study aimed to evaluate whether L3 vertebra bone density measured using lumbar computed tomography (CT) can serve as a potential biomarker for estimating the chronological age of adults over 20 years of age.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We retrospectively analyzed lumbar CT images of 925 individuals (485 men and 440 women) from 2024 to 2025 from three medical centers and measured bone density at the axial midpoint of the L3 vertebral body using CT.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further validation in larger, diverse cohorts and integration with other biomarkers are needed to assess its utility in legal and administrative frameworks.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Lumbar vertebrae · age estimation · bone density

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate whether L3 vertebra bone density measured using lumbar computed tomography (CT) can serve as a potential biomarker for estimating the chronological age of adults over 20 years of age. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed lumbar CT images of 925 individuals (485 men and 440 women) from 2024 to 2025 from three medical centers and measured bone density at the axial midpoint of the L3 vertebral body using CT. Pearson’s correlation and piecewise regression were used to evaluate age-CT density relationships and identify physiological breakpoints. Based on these, we developed a logistic regression model to classify individuals across sex-specific thresholds (49 years old for women and 56 years old for men). To evaluate the legal or administrative applicability of age estimation, four classification models (logistic regression, random forest, support vector cliassifier (SVC), and XGBoost) were compared using a legally significant 65-year cutoff. For continuous age estimation, five regression algorithms-XGBoost, random forest, support vector regressor (SVR) with radial basis function (RBF), ridge, and linear regression-were trained and validated using a five-fold cross-validation scheme, an internal test set, and an independent external dataset. To capture the stability of our findings, 95% confidence intervals were computed for all validation phases. Results: A strong negative correlation was observed between chronological age and CT density in both sexes (r=-0.75 in men, r=-0.85 in women). Logistic regression demonstrated good categorical classification performance, with accuracies of 82% in men and 92% in women. For the female cohort, the best predictive performance was achieved by SVR (RBF) in cross validation (CV) (MAE: 7.734), linear regression in the single test (MAE: 8.032), and linear regression in external validation (MAE: 6.368, R2: 0.717). For the male cohort, random forest led in CV (MAE: 9.388), and SVR (RBF) excelled in both the single test (MAE: 9.703) and external validation (MAE: 7.521, R2: 0.721). Conclusion: The density of the L3 vertebral body measured using routine CT scans is a promising biomarker for age estimation, showing strong categorical classification and predictive utility, especially around the 65-year legal threshold for women. Although its use as a standalone tool for definitive estimation is limited, CT density shows promise as a complementary parameter for age estimation. Further validation in larger, diverse cohorts and integration with other biomarkers are needed to assess its utility in legal and administrative frameworks.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sipahioğlu, S., Işık, F., Köksal, A., Koru, A. (2026). Correction: Can L3 lumbar vertebral body CT density reflect age?. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 5. https://ajindex.com/articles/1508166

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Bhardwaj V, Kumar I, Aggarwal P, Singh PK, Shukla RC, Verma A. Demystifying radiography of age estimation in criminal jurisprudence: a pictorial review. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2024;34(3):496-510. doi:10. 1055/s-0043-1778651
  2. Akcan R, Serif YM, Tümer AR. Forensic age estimation in the geriatric age group. Turk J Geriatr. 2019;22(2):132-139. doi:10.31086/tjgeri.2019.86
  3. Schmeling A, Dettmeyer R, Rudolf E, Vieth V, Geserick G. Forensic age estimation. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016;113(4):44-50. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2016.0044
  4. Demirkıran DS, Çelikel A, Zeren C, Arslan MM. Methods for age estimation. Dicle Med J. 2014;41(1):238-243. doi:10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2014.01.041
  5. De Sanctis V, Di Maio S, Soliman AT, et al. Hand radiography in pediatric endocrinology: skeletal age assessment and beyond. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;18(suppl 1):S63-S71. doi:10.4103/2230-8210.145076
  6. Satoh M. Bone age: assessment methods and clinical applications. Clin. Pediatr. Endocrinol. 2015;24(4):143-152. doi:10.1297/cpe.24.143
  7. Panchbhai AS. Dental radiographic indicators: a key to age estimation. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(4):199-212. doi:10.1259/dmfr/19478385
  8. Chandrakanth HV, Kanchan T, Krishan K, Arun M, Pramod Kumar GN. Estimation of age from human sterna: an autopsy study on a sample from South India. Int J Legal Med. 2012;126(6):863-868. doi:10.1007/s00414-012-0752-0
  9. Khaleghi M, Memarian A, Shekarchi B, Bagheri H, Maleki N, Safari N. Second and third lumbar vertebral parameters for the prediction of sex, height, and age in the Iranian population. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2023;19(3):364-371. doi:10.1007/s12024-022-00554-6
  10. Riggs BL, Melton LJ, Robb RA, et al. A population-based assessment of rates of bone loss at multiple skeletal sites: evidence of substantial trabecular bone loss in young adult women and men. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23(2):205-214. doi:10.1359/jbmr.071020
  11. Macdonald HM, Nishiyama KK, Kang J, Hanley DA, Boyd SK. Age-related patterns of trabecular and cortical bone loss differ between sexes and skeletal sites: a population-based HR-pQCT study. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(1):50-62. doi:10.1002/jbmr.171
  12. Brance ML, Saraví FD, Henríquez MM, et al. Age- and sex-related volumetric density differences in the trabecular and cortical bone of the proximal femur in a healthy population. J Bone Metab. 2024;31(4):279-289. doi:10.11005/jbm.24.765
  13. Seeman E. Pathogenesis of bone fragility in women and men. Lancet. 2002;359(9320):1841-1850. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08706-8
  14. Simion G, Eckardt N, Ullrich BW, Senft C, Schwarz F. Bone density of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine measured using Hounsfield units of computed tomography: results of 4350 vertebrae. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2024;25(1):200. doi:10.1186/s12891-024-07324-1
  15. Jang S, Graffy PM, Ziemlewicz TJ, Lee SJ, Summers RM, Pickhardt PJ. Opportunistic osteoporosis screening at routine abdominal and thoracic CT: normative L1 trabecular attenuation values in more than 20 000 adults. Radiology. 2019;291(2):360-367. doi:10.1148/radiol.2019181648
  16. Schreiber JJ, Anderson PA, Hsu WK. Use of computed tomography to assess bone mineral density. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(1):E4. doi:10. 3171/2014.5.FOCUS1483
  17. Li S, Zhao J, Hao S, et al. Multiple linear regression and ROC curve analyses of the factors of lumbar spine bone mineral density. Natl Med J China. 2015;95(33):2667-2670. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2015.33.006
  18. Imaizumi K, Usui S, Nagata T, Hayakawa H, Shiotani S. Development of an age estimation method for the coxal bone and lumbar vertebrae obtained from post-mortem computed tomography images using a convolutional neural network. Int J Legal Med. 2026;140(1):343-355. doi:10.1007/s00414-025-03587-y
  19. Cao Y, Ma Y, Zhang S, et al. Automatic adult age estimation using bone mineral density of proximal femur via deep learning. Forensic Sci Int. 2025;372:112511. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112511
  20. Liu M, Luo S, Lu T, et al. Skull CT metadata for automatic bone age assessment using a three-dimensional deep learning framework. Int J Legal Med. 2025;139(5):2273-2287. doi:10.1007/s00414-025-03469-3
  21. Cao Y, Zhang J, Ma Y, et al. The impact of multi-modality fusion and deep learning on adult age estimation based on bone mineral density. Int J Legal Med. 2025;139(4):1721-1733. doi:10.1007/s00414-025-03432-2
  22. Zhang HH, Cao YJ, Zhang J, et al. Adult ischium age estimation based on deep learning and 3D CT reconstruction. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024;40(2): 154-163. doi:10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2023.231003
  23. Rudin C. Stop explaining black-box machine learning models for high-stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nat Mach Intell. 2019;1(5):206-215. doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x