Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 5

Donor and recipient characteristics associated with rebubbling rate, endothelial cell loss, and graft failure in primary descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Pages
1461–1467
Publication Date
2022-09-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, surgeons should consider DtPT for DMEK in eyes with BK.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To determine whether donor and recipient characteristics are associated with rebubbling rate, endothelial cell loss (ECL), and graft failure 3 years after primary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Records of 295 consecutive DMEK surgery and match with corresponding donor data were reviewed at a tertiary referral clinic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, surgeons should consider DtPT for DMEK in eyes with BK.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty · death-to-preservation time · graft failure

Abstract

Aim: To determine whether donor and recipient characteristics are associated with rebubbling rate, endothelial cell loss (ECL), and graft failure 3 years after primary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Material and Method: Records of 295 consecutive DMEK surgery and match with corresponding donor data were reviewed at a tertiary referral clinic. Recipients with intraoperative complications and coexisting ocular pathologies were excluded. Age, sex of donor and recipient, cause of donor death, death-to-preservation time (DtPT), storage time, donor endothelial cell density (ECD), and indications for surgery were analyzed for correlation with rebubbling rate, postoperative ECL, and graft failure. Further, subgroup analyses of the cause of death, donor sex, DtPT (median value, 3.5 h), and indications were performed. Multiple regression and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis were used to determine the independent risk factors for graft failure. Results: This study included 114 eyes that underwent DMEK for bullous keratopathy (BK; 64%) and for Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD; 36%). The graft failure percentage was the only parameter that was higher in patients with DtPT > 3.5 h (p=0.047) than those with shorter DtPT. The probability of graft failure was seven times higher in eyes with DtPT > 3.5 h than with shorter DtPT (odds ratio 7.36, 95% confidence interval CI 1.34‒40.53) and 10 times higher in eyes with BK than those with FECD (odds ratio 10.29, 95% CI 1.01‒104.54). Conclusion:. DtPT and recipients with BK diagnosis were found to be independent risk factors for graft failure. Therefore, surgeons should consider DtPT for DMEK in eyes with BK.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNAYDIN, N. T., TANYILDIZ, B. (2022). Donor and recipient characteristics associated with rebubbling rate, endothelial cell loss, and graft failure in primary descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 5, 1461–1467. https://ajindex.com/articles/776479

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Melles GRJ, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2006; 25: 987-90.
  2. Sugar J, Montoya M, Dontchev M, et al. Donor risk factors for graft failure in the cornea donor study. Cornea 2009; 28: 981-5.
  3. Terry MA, Aldave AJ, Szczotka-Flynn LB, et al. Donor, recipient, and operative factors associated with graft success in the cornea preservation time study. Ophthalmology 2018; 125: 1700-9. DeMatteo J. Eye Bank Association of America medical standards regarding Ebola policy. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015; 133: 1364. Dapena I, Moutsouris K, Droutsas K, Ham L, van Dijk K, Melles GR. Standardized “no-touch” technique for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2011; 129: 88-94.
  4. Bhogal M, Maurino V, Allan BD. Use of a single peripheral triangular mark to ensure correct graft orientation in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015; 41: 2022-4.
  5. Lass JH, Szczotka-Flynn LB, Ayala AR, et al. Cornea preservation time study: methods and potential impact on the cornea donor pool in the United States. Cornea 2015; 34: 601-8. Rodríguez-Calvo de Mora M, Groeneveld-van Beek EA, Frank LE, et al. Association between graft storage time and donor age with endothelial cell density and graft adherence after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. JAMA Ophthalmol 2016; 134: 91-4.
  6. Heinzelmann S, Hüther S, Böhringer D, Eberwein P, Reinhard T, Maier P. Influence of donor characteristics on descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2014; 33: 644-8.
  7. Straiko MD, Bauer AJ, Straiko MMW, et al. Donor DMEK tissue characteristics: association with rebubble rate and 6-month endothelial cell loss. Cornea 2020; 39: 1267-73.
  8. Dunker S, Winkens B, van den Biggelaar F, et al. Rebubbling and graft failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a prospective Dutch registry study. Br J Ophthalmol 2021; bjophthalmol-2020-317041.
  9. Baydoun L, Ham L, Borderie V, et al. Endothelial survival after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: effect of surgical indication and graft adherence status. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015; 133: 1277-85.
  10. Oellerich S, Ham L, Frank LE, et al. Parameters associated with endothelial cell density variability after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2020; 211: 22-30.
  11. Patel SV, Diehl NN, Hodge DO, Bourne WM. Donor risk factors for graft failure in a 20-year study of penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2010; 128: 418-25.
  12. Birbal RS, Ni Dhubhghaill S, Bourg