Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 5

Does uterine septum resection improve IVF treatment success?

Pages
1272–1275
Publication Date
2022-09-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There is insufficient evidence to perform septum resection in patients with uterine septum prior to infertility treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Uterine septum is the most common type of congenital uterine malformation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: 7790 patients were scanned retrospectively. 110 patients with the uterine septum and unexplained infertility were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There is insufficient evidence to perform septum resection in patients with uterine septum prior to infertility treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Infertility · IVF · septum resection

Abstract

Aim: Uterine septum is the most common type of congenital uterine malformation. The septum has also been suggested as a potential cause of infertility. The role of the septum in infertility and whether the septum can be resected is debatable. We aimed to reveal the results of assisted reproductive techniques in patients with septate uterus according to whether or not resection is performed. Material and Method: 7790 patients were scanned retrospectively. 110 patients with the uterine septum and unexplained infertility were included in the study. Patients who underwent uterine septum resection were recorded. The clinical pregnancies of patients were compared according to whether or not resection was performed. In addition, patients with complete septum were evaluated according to whether or not resection was performed, and their clinical pregnancies were evaluated. Results: It was revealed that 79 of the patients with uterine septum underwent septum resection operation. It was determined that 31 patients were not treated. Clinical pregnancy rates were found to be statistically significantly higher in the expectant management group (p=0.02). In addition, comparing the clinical pregnancy rates of the resection and expectant management groups in patients with a complete septum, no significant difference was found between the groups (p=0.134). Conclusion: In our study, the success of treatment with assisted reproductive techniques did not change after septum resection. Although uterine septum resection is a simple and safe method, it has disadvantages such as the development of adhesions and rupture in the uterus. There is insufficient evidence to perform septum resection in patients with uterine septum prior to infertility treatment.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDULUM, M. F. C., DEMİRDAĞ, E., ARIK, S. İ., ERDEM, M., BOZKURT, N., OKTEM, M., GÜLER, İ., ERDEM, A. (2022). Does uterine septum resection improve IVF treatment success?. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 5, 1272–1275. https://ajindex.com/articles/776447

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Grimbizis G, Camus M, Clasen K, Tournaye H, De Munck L, Devroey P. Hysteroscopic septum resection in patients with recurrent abortions or infertility. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 1188-93. Acién P, Acién MI. The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17: 693-705.
  2. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, Thornton JG, Coomarasamy A, Raine‐Fenning NJ. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 371-82.
  3. Kormanyos, Z, Molnar BG, Pal A. Removal of a residual portion of a uterine septum in women of advanced reproductive age: obstetric outcome. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 1047-51.
  4. Bendifallah S, Faivre E, Legendre G, Deffieux X, Fernandez H. Metroplasty for AFS Class V and VI septate uterus in patients with infertility or miscarriage: reproductive outcomes study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013; 20: 178-84.
  5. Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, Gordts S, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online 2014; 29: 665-83.
  6. Rikken JF, Kowalik CR, Emanuel MH, et al. Septum resection for women of reproductive age with a septate uterus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 1: CD008576. Rikken JF, Leeuwis‐Fedorovich NE, Letteboer S, et al. The pathophysiology of the septate uterus: a systematic review. BJOG 2019; 126: 1192-9. Valle RF. Ekpo GE. Hysteroscopic metroplasty for the septate uterus: review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013; 20: 22-42.
  7. Rikken JF, Kowalik CR, Emanuel MH, et al. Septum resection versus expectant management in women with a septate uterus: an international multicentre open-label randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2021; 36: 1260-7. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address, A.a.o. and M. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive, Uterine septum: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2016; 106: 530-40.
  8. Heinonen, PK, Saarikoski S, Pystynen P. Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies. An evaluation of 182 cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982; 61: 157-62.
  9. Homer HA, Li TC, Cooke ID. The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 1-14.
  10. Fedele L, Arcaini L, Parazzini F, Vercellini P, Di Nola G. Reproductive prognosis after hysteroscopic metroplasty in 102 women: life-table analysis. Fertil Steril 1993;