SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

Indwelling Bladder Catheter Using in Cesarean Section: Is It Really Necessary?

Sezaryende Kullanılan Kalıcı Mesane Kateteri: Gerçekten Gerekli mi?

Erhan DEMİRDAĞ
Munire Funda CEVHER AKDULUM
Esin ŞAHİN TORUK
Recep Onur KARABACAK
Pages
1396–1400
Publication Date
2022-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: While cesarean duration was significantly longer in group 1, postoperative urination, postoperative mobilization, and the hospital discharge times were significantly longer in group 2 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the safety of cesarean section (CS) without an indwelling bladder catheter.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This case-control study was conducted retrospectively in Gazi University Faculty of Medicine Hospital between April and September 2021.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: While cesarean duration was significantly longer in group 1, postoperative urination, postoperative mobilization, and the hospital discharge times were significantly longer in group 2 (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sezaryen · İdrar kataterleri · İdrar yapma

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the safety of cesarean section (CS) without an indwelling bladder catheter. We also aimed to compare the differences of clinical and voiding characteristics in patients with or without the urinary catheter after CS. Materials and Methods: This case-control study was conducted retrospectively in Gazi University Faculty of Medicine Hospital between April and September 2021. A total of 40 patients having an elective CS were reviewed. Among these patients, two groups were analyzed according to urinary catheter use: Patients without the urinary catheter (Group 1 / Study) and patients with the urinary catheter (Group 2 / Control). Outcome measures were postoperative urination, postoperative mobilization, and the discharge time of the patients. Results: While cesarean duration was significantly longer in group 1, postoperative urination, postoperative mobilization, and the hospital discharge times were significantly longer in group 2 (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma kalıcı mesane kateteri olmadan sezaryen doğumun (SD) güvenliğini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamıştır. Ayrıca bu çalışmada üriner kateteri olan ve olmayan hastaların SD sonrası klinik ve idrar boşaltım özellikleri arasındaki farklılıkların karşılaştırılması da amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve yöntemler: Bu vaka-kontrol çalışması Gazi Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi'nde Nisan ile Eylül 2021 tarihleri arasında retrospektif olarak yürütüldü. Elektif sezaryen olan toplam 40 hasta incelendi. Bu hastalardan idrar sondası kullanımına göre iki grup incelendi: idrar sondası olmayan hastalar (Grup 1 / Çalışma) ve idrar sondası olan hastalar (Grup 2 / Kontol). Sonuç ölçütleri postoperatif idrara çıkma, postoperatif mobilizasyon ve hastaların taburcu olma süresi idi. Bulgular: Grup 1'de sezaryen süresi anlamlı olarak daha uzun iken, grup 2'de postoperatif idrara çıkma, postoperatif mobilizasyon ve hastaneden çıkış süreleri anlamlı olarak daha uzundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRDAĞ, E., AKDULUM, M. F. C., TORUK, E. Ş., KARABACAK, R. O. (2022). Indwelling Bladder Catheter Using in Cesarean Section: Is It Really Necessary?. Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 1396–1400. https://ajindex.com/articles/676482

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: Final Data for 2014. National vital statistics reports: from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. 2015;64(12):1-64
  2. Ghoreishi J. Indwelling urinary catheters in cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;83(3):267-70
  3. Beeson PB. The case against the catheter. Am J Med. 1958;24(1):1-3
  4. Pandey D, Mehta S, Grover A, Goel N. Indwelling Catheterization in Caesarean Section: Time To Retire It! J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(9):Qc01-4
  5. Nasr AM, ElBigawy AF, Abdelamid AE, Al-Khulaidi S, Al-Inany HG, Sayed EH. Evaluation of the use vs nonuse of urinary catheterization during cesarean delivery: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2009;29(6):416-21
  6. Buchholz NP, Daly-Grandeau E, Huber-Buchholz MM. Urological complications associated with caesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994;56(3):161-3
  7. Tangtrakul S, Taechaiya S, Suthutvoravut S, Linasmita V. Post-cesarean section urinary tract infection: a comparison between intermittent and indwelling catheterization. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet. 1994;77(5):244-8
  8. Chaudhuri P, Vengadasalam D. Urinary tract infection following abdominal delivery--second thought on indwelling catheter. Singapore Med J. 1983;24(4):224-6
  9. Moulton L, Lachiewicz M, Liu X, Goje O. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) after term cesarean delivery: incidence and risk factors at a multi-center academic institution. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(3):395-400
  10. Schwartz MA, Wang CC, Eckert LO, Critchlow CW. Risk factors for urinary tract infection in the postpartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(3):547-53
  11. Barnes JS. Is it better to avoid urethral catheterization at hysterectomy and caesarean section? The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology. 1998;38(3):315-6
  12. Weinstein JW, Mazon D, Pantelick E, Reagan-Cirincione P, Dembry LM, Hierholzer WJ, Jr. A decade of prevalence surveys in a tertiary-care center: trends in nosocomial infection rates, device utilization, and patient acuity. Infection control and hospital epidemiology. 1999;20(8):543-8
  13. Senanayake H. Elective cesarean section without urethral catheterization. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2005;31(1):32-7
  14. Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P,