SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

A content analysis of studies published in the field of augmented reality in education

Mahmut Emre TURHAN
Mustafa METİN
Ebru EZBERCİ ÇEVİK
Pages
243–262
Publication Date
2022-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore; it has been determined that the achievement test in quantitative studies and interview form in qualitative research is more preferred as a data collection tool.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This review study was carried out using content analysis and it was aimed to analyze the articles published in national journals in the field of augmented reality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of this study, in which the content analysis method was used, consists of 87 academic studies conducted in the field of augmented reality in education in Turkey between 2012 and 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore; it has been determined that the achievement test in quantitative studies and interview form in qualitative research is more preferred as a data collection tool.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Educational Technology · Augmented Reality · Augmented Reality Applications

Abstract

This review study was carried out using content analysis and it was aimed to analyze the articles published in national journals in the field of augmented reality. The sample of this study, in which the content analysis method was used, consists of 87 academic studies conducted in the field of augmented reality in education in Turkey between 2012 and 2020. Studies obtained as a result of scanning were analyzed according to some variables such as the publication year, purpose, subject area, approach / method, sample group, sample number, data collection tool of study. As a result of the analysis of the research, it was observed that the first studies started in 2012 and increased with each year. It has been determined that most of the studies are aimed at determining the effect of augmented reality on students' achievement. In addition, it was seen that the vast majority of researches were carried out in the field of science education, using the experimental research method with 40-60 university students. Furthermore; it has been determined that the achievement test in quantitative studies and interview form in qualitative research is more preferred as a data collection tool.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURHAN, M. E., METİN, M., ÇEVİK, E. E. (2022). A content analysis of studies published in the field of augmented reality in education. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 243–262. https://ajindex.com/articles/776052

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abdüsselam, M. S. & Karal, H. (2012). Fizik öğretiminde artırılmış gerçeklik ortamlarının öğrenci akademik başarısı üzerine etkisi: 11. sınıf manyetizma konusu örneği [The effect of mixed reality environments on the students' academic achievement in physics education: 11th grade magnetism topic example]. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 1(4), 170-181.
  2. Altınpulluk, M., & Kesim, H. (2015). Geçmişten günümüze artırılmış gerçeklik uygulamalarında gerçekleşen paradigma değişimleri [Paradigm shifts in augmented reality applications from the past to the present]. Eskişehir Academic Informatics Congress. doi:10.13140/2.1.3721.2967 Baum, L. F. (1901). The master key an electrical fairy tale. Public Domain. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2011). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methology]. (8th Edt.). Ankara:
  3. Pegem Academy. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Observation. Research Methods in Education, 6, 396-412.
  4. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Çalık, M. & Sözbilir, M. (2014). İçerik analizinin parametreleri [Parameters of content analysis]. Education and Science, 39(174), 33-38.
  5. Çepni, S. (2005). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş [Introduction to research and project studies]. Pegem Academy. Çiltaş, A., Güler, G., & Sözbilir, M. (2012). Türkiye’de matematik eğitimi araştırmaları: Bir içerik analizi çalışması [Mathematics education research in Turkey: A content analysis study]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 565-580.
  6. Demirer, V., & Erbaş, Ç. (2015). Mobil artırılmış gerçeklik uygulamalarının incelenmesi ve eğitimsel açıdan değerlendirilmesi [Investigation of mobile augmented reality applications and evaluation of educational perspective]. Mersin University Journal of The Faculty of Education, 11(3), 802-813. Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586-596.
  7. Elçiçek, M. (2021). Tendencies in Turkey-based academic studies on distance education during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 4(3), 406-417
  8. Eyüp, B. (2020). Türkçe öğretmenleri ile ilgili yapılan lisansüstü tezlerin eğilimleri: Bir içerik analizi (2000-2019) [Trends of postgraduate theses about Turkish language teachers: