Journals / Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Academics’ perception and practices of online education during the Covid-19 pandemic: The case of Turkey

Pages
32–46
Publication Date
2022-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our results showed that even the academics with online education experience have a higher level of distrust towards educational measurement and evaluation methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:COVID-19 affected higher educational institutions around the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The survey research design used and an e-survey was conducted in May 2020, during which the lockdown restrictions were rather tight in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our results showed that even the academics with online education experience have a higher level of distrust towards educational measurement and evaluation methods.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:COVID-19 · Pandemic in Turkey · Perception of online education

Abstract

COVID-19 affected higher educational institutions around the world. This study focused on academics’ perceptions and practices of online education based on their academic discipline and previous online education experience. The survey research design used and an e-survey was conducted in May 2020, during which the lockdown restrictions were rather tight in Turkey. The analyzes were carried out on the responses of 8,242 academics’ using the omnibus chi-square test and t-tests. The results point out that academics’ time allocation to preparation for courses, student counselling, and lectures are varying due to their academic disciplines. Generally, academics have a negative perception of online education though there is a difference between the experienced ones and others. In particular, academics with online education experience exhibited lower negative perceptions of online education than those lacking such experience. Maybe one of the most problematic parts of this transition process for academics is how to ensure the reliability of exams. Our results showed that even the academics with online education experience have a higher level of distrust towards educational measurement and evaluation methods.

🔖

Cite This Article

KALAYCIOĞLU, D. B., TOPRAK, A., EYERCİ, C., UGUR, Z., GÜÇ, A., YILDIZ, S., TOPRAK, M., DEMİR, Z., DEMİR, Ö., YILDIZ, Ö. F., ÇELİKKAYA, R. (2022). Academics’ perception and practices of online education during the Covid-19 pandemic: The case of Turkey. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 32–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/776041

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Acar-Güvendir, M., & Özer-Özkan, Y. (2021). Uzaktan eğitimin değerlendirmeye yansımaları: Çevrim içi sınavlar mı sınıf içi sınavlar mı?. Journal of Digital Measurement and Evaluation Research, 1(1), 22-34.
  2. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2012). Conflicted: Faculty and Online Education. Babson Survey Research Group. Alshangeeti, A., Alsaghier, H., & Nguyen, A. (2009). Faculty perceptions of attributes affecting the diffusion of online learning in Saudi Arabia: A quantitative study. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on E-Learning, 2009, (10-24).
  3. Anglin, L., & Anglin, K. (2009). On-line Teaching: Lessons Learned. Academy of Business Disciplines. Bates, T. (2021). What should we be doing about online learning when social distancing ends? Online Learning and Distance Education Resources. https://www.tonybates.ca/2020/04/07/what-should-we-be-doing-about-online-learningwhen-social-distancing-ends/
  4. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Open University Press.
  5. Bell, R., & Tight, M. (1993). Open universities: A British tradition? Taylor and Francis. Bolliger, D. U., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Education, 30(1), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910902845949
  6. Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to coronavirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i-vi. Bunk, J., Li, R., Smidt, E., Bidetti, C., & Malize, B. (2015). Understanding faculty attitudes about distance education: The importance of excitement and fear. Online Learning, 19(4), n4. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
  7. Coughlan, T., & Perryman, L. A. (2011). Something for everyone? The different approaches of academic disciplines to open educational resources and the impact on widening participation. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 15(2), 11-27.
  8. Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., & Glowatz, M. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Teaching and Learning, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications. Dolloph, F. M. (2007). Online higher education faculty: Perceptions, learning, and changes in teaching. West Vi