Journals / OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 23

Internal and External Factors Affecting Entrepreneurship from the Eyes of Entrepreneurs

Girişimcilerin Gözünden Girişimciliği Etkileyen İçsel ve Dışsal Faktörler

Pages
1849–1884
Publication Date
2020-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the discovery of the ideals and dreams in the direction of the opinions of entrepreneurs as a factor prompting individuals to entrepreneurship has enabled the study to make an original contribution to the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to reveal what the internal and external factors affecting entrepreneurship are and which of these factors have superiority over others in choosing the entrepreneurship career.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, in-depth interviews were conducted with 16 entrepreneurs owning workplaces in various provinces of Turkey, 9 of whom are men and 7 of whom are women.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the discovery of the ideals and dreams in the direction of the opinions of entrepreneurs as a factor prompting individuals to entrepreneurship has enabled the study to make an original contribution to the literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Girişimcilik · Başarma İhtiyacı · Kontrol Odağı

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to reveal what the internal and external factors affecting entrepreneurship are and which of these factors have superiority over others in choosing the entrepreneurship career. For this purpose, a qualitative research was conducted. In this context, in-depth interviews were conducted with 16 entrepreneurs owning workplaces in various provinces of Turkey, 9 of whom are men and 7 of whom are women. During the interviews, a formerly prepared interview form consisting of 10 semi-structured questions was used. The data were analysed by NVivo package program according to thematic network analysis method. According to the findings of the study, internal factors and external factors play a role among the factors that push individuals to entrepreneurship. However, internal factors were found to be more effective. Especially personality traits were determined to be the most important factor in choosing the entrepreneurship career. The research differs from other studies in that it examines internal and external factors together and focuses on individuals who are already entrepreneurs rather than those who have the potential to choose an entrepreneurship career. In addition, the discovery of the ideals and dreams in the direction of the opinions of entrepreneurs as a factor prompting individuals to entrepreneurship has enabled the study to make an original contribution to the literature.

Özet

Bu çalışmada bireylerin girişimci olmasında rol oynayan içsel ve dışsal faktörlerin neler olduğu ve bu faktörlerden hangisinin girişimcilik kariyerini seçmede diğerlerine üstünlük kurduğunun ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda nitel bir araştırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu bağlamda Türkiye’nin çeşitli illerinde işyeri sahibi olan, 9’u erkek ve 7’si kadın olmak üzere toplam 16 girişimci ile derinlemesine görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Görüşmelerde önceden hazırlanmış ve 10 adet yarı yapılandırılmış sorudan oluşan görüşme formu uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler tematik ağ analizi yöntemine göre NVivo paket programı aracılığıyla analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın bulgularına göre bireyleri girişimciliğe iten unsurlar arasında içsel faktörler ve dışsal faktörler rol oynamaktadır. Fakat içsel faktörlerin daha etkili olduğu görülmüştür. Özellikle kişilik özelliklerinin girişimcilik kariyerini seçmede en önemli unsur olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma, içsel ve dışsal faktörleri bir arada irdelemesi ve girişimcilik kariyerini tercih etme potansiyeli olanlardan ziyade halihazırda girişimcilik yapan bireylere odaklanması yönüyle diğer çalışmalardan ayrılmaktadır. Ayrıca girişimcilerin görüşleri doğrultusunda sahip olunan ideallerin ve hayallerin bireyleri girişimciliğe iten birer faktör olmasının keşfedilmesi, çalışmanın literatüre yönelik özgün bir katkı sunmasını sağlamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİÇEK, B., KARAKAŞ, Y. E. (2020). Internal and External Factors Affecting Entrepreneurship from the Eyes of Entrepreneurs. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 23, 1849–1884. https://ajindex.com/articles/77482

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Acs, Z. J., Arenius, P., Hay, M., ve Minniti, M. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2004 executive report. Retrieved from UK: Acs, Z. J., ve Audretsch, D. B. (2003). Introduction to the handbook of entrepreneurship research. In Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 3-20):
  2. Springer. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 32(4), 665-683.
  3. Akhmetshin, E. M., Romanov, P. Y., Zakieva, R. R., Zhminko, A. E., Aleshko, R. A., ve Makarov, A. L. (2019). Modern Approaches to Innovative Project Management in Entrepreneurship Education: A Review of Methods and Applications in Education. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 22, 1-15.
  4. Asante, E. A., ve Affum-Osei, E. (2019). Entrepreneurship as a career choice: The impact of locus of control on aspiring entrepreneurs' opportunity recognition. Journal of Business Research, 98, 227-235.
  5. Athiyaman, A., Dabson, B., Hamm, G. F., Henderson, J., Holley, J., Hustedde, R., Loveridge, S. (2007). Entrepreneurship and local economic development: Lexington Books. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405.
  6. Audretsch, D. B., Thurik, R., Verheul, I., ve Wennekers, S. (2002). Entrepreneurship: determinants and policy in a European-US comparison (Vol. 27): Springer Science & Business Media. Balaban, Ö., ve Özdemir, Y. (2008). Girişimcilik eğitiminin girişimcilik eğilimi üzerindeki etkisi: Sakarya üniversitesi İİBF örneği. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 32, 133-147.
  7. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191. Barbosa, S. D., Gerhardt, M. W., ve Kickul, J. R. (2007). The role of cognitive style and risk preference on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(4), 86-104.
  8. Baron, R. A. (2004). The cognitive perspective: a valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship's basic “why” questions. Journal of business venturing, 19(2), 221-239.
  9. Bates, T. (1985). Entrepreneur human capital endowments and minority business viability. Journal of Human Resources, 20(4), 540-554.
  10. Baum, J. R., Frese, M., ve Baron, R. A. (2014). Born to be an entrepreneur? Revisiting the personality approach to entrepreneurship. In The psychology of entrepreneurship (p. 73-98):
  11. Psychology Press.
  12. Becker, G. S., Murphy, K.