SavedAdd your journal

Journals / OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 23

Innovative Behavior Patterns of Employees In Terms of Demographic Characteristics, Professional Experiences And Educational Status: An Investigation on Turkish Banking Sector

Çalışanların Demografik Özelliklerine, Mesleki Tecrübelerine ve Eğitim Durumlarına Göre Yenilikçi Davranış Örüntüleri: Türk Bankacılık Sektörü Üzerine Bir İnceleme

İbrahim Halil KORKMAZ
Pages
1668–1698
Publication Date
2020-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis of the dataset obtained, it was found that the innovative behaviors of the banking sector employees differ according to different sector experiences, ages and educational backgrounds (p 0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In today's intense economic competition environment, innovation has become an inevitable necessity for survival and profit.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For the banking sector enterprises that have to operate in a way to meet the new needs of their customers while maintaining their corporate structure, it is very important that their employees have innovative features.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis of the dataset obtained, it was found that the innovative behaviors of the banking sector employees differ according to different sector experiences, ages and educational backgrounds (p 0.05).
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yenilikçi davranış · bankacılık sektörü · demografi

Abstract

In today's intense economic competition environment, innovation has become an inevitable necessity for survival and profit. For the banking sector enterprises that have to operate in a way to meet the new needs of their customers while maintaining their corporate structure, it is very important that their employees have innovative features. This study aims to investigate the innovative behavior characteristics of bank employees according to their demographic characteristics, experiences and educational status. Within the scope of the study, 443 banking sector personnel were surveyed. As a result of the analysis of the dataset obtained, it was found that the innovative behaviors of the banking sector employees differ according to different sector experiences, ages and educational backgrounds (p 0.05). However, the gender, marital status and banking tenure of the banking sector employees have no effect on their innovative behavior (p 0.05). The results of the study is considered to be interesting and beneficial both for sector representatives and for the academic environment related to innovation.

Özet

Günümüzün yoğun ekonomik rekabet ortamında yenilikçilik, işletmelerin varlıklarını sürdürebilmeleri ve karlılıkları için kaçınılmaz bir gereklilik haline gelmiştir. Kurumsal yapılarını muhafaza ederken müşterilerinin yenilenen ihtiyaçlarına cevap verebilecek şekilde faaliyet göstermek durumunda olan bankacılık sektörü işletmeleri için, çalışanlarının yenilikçi özelliklere sahip olması oldukça önemlidir. Bu çalışmada bankacılık sektörü çalışanlarının yenilikçi davranış karakteristikleri demografik özelliklerine, mesleki tecrübelerine ve eğitim durumlarına göre incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma kapsamında 443 bankacılık sektörü çalışanına anket uygulanmıştır. Toplanan verisetinin analizi sonucunda bankacılık sektörü çalışanlarının yenilikçi davranış eğilimleri farklı sektör tecrübelerine, yaşlarına ve eğitim durumlarına göre anlamlı şekilde farklılaşmaktadır (p<0.05). Bununla birlikte cinsiyet, medeni durum ve bankacılık sektörüne ilişkin mesleki tecrübenin yenilikçi davranış üzerinde etkisi bulunmamıştır (p  0.05). Çalışmanın sonuçlarından, ilgili sektörden paydaşların ve yenilikçilik konusuyla ilgilenen akademik çevrenin faydalanabileceği düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, İ. H. (2020). Innovative Behavior Patterns of Employees In Terms of Demographic Characteristics, Professional Experiences And Educational Status: An Investigation on Turkish Banking Sector. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 23, 1668–1698. https://ajindex.com/articles/77480

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 10, 123-167.
  2. Ancona, D. G. and Caldwell, D. F. (1988). Beyond task and maintenance: Defining external functions in groups. Group & Organization Studies,13(4), 468–494.
  3. Anderson, N., De Dreu, C.K. and Nijstad, B.A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 147-173.
  4. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K. and Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333.
  5. Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F.O., Zhou, Q. and Hartnell, C.A. (2012). Transformational leadership, innovative behavior, and task performance: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Human Performance, 25(1), 1-25.
  6. Axtell, C.M., Holman, D.J., Unsworth, K.L., Wall, T.D., Waterson, P.E. and Harrington, E. (2000). Shop-floor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 7 (3), 265-285, doi: 10.1348/096317900167029. Baer, M. (2012), Putting creativity to work: the implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1102-1119.
  7. Bagheri, A. (2017), The impact of entrepreneurial leadership on innovation work behavior and opportunity recognition in high-technology SMEs. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 28(2), 159-166.
  8. Carmeli, A., Meitar, R. and Weisberg, J. (2006). Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work. International Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 75-90.
  9. Cegarra-Navarro, J-G., Jiménez-Jiménez, D. and Garcia-Perez, A. (2019). An integrative view of knowledge processes and a learning culture for ambidexterity: Towards improved organisational performance in the banking sector. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2917430 Cepeda-Carrión, I., Leal-Millán, A. G. and Ortega-Gutierrez, J. (2015). Linking unlearning with service quality through learning processes in the Spanish banking industry. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1450- 1457. Choi, S.B., Kim, K., Ullah, S.E. and Kang, S.W. (2016). How transformational leadership facilitates innovative behavior of Korean workers: examining mediating and moderating processes. Personnel Review, 45(3), 459-479.
  10. Çimen, İ. and Yücel, C. (2017). Innovat