SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3

Interlaboratory Precision of Acute Toxicity Tests Using Reference Toxicant Formaldehyde

Akut Toksisite Testi Hassasiyetinin Belirlenmesinde Referans Toksik Madde Olarak Formaldehit Kullanımı

V. Zülal SÖNMEZ
Nüket SİVRİ
Pages
96–99
Publication Date
2016-12-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The investigated toxicants show the performance of pipetting sensitivity of reagent, analyzer and test operator.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Acute toxicity test, which takes place among rapid toxicity tests and is conducted through bioluminescent bacteria, has been included in many countries' standards thanks to its test duration, sample volume, cost-efficiency and result sensitivity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Acute toxicity of formaldehyde, according to Vibrio fischeri, was investigated on 5, 15 and 30 minutes of inhibition periods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The investigated toxicants show the performance of pipetting sensitivity of reagent, analyzer and test operator.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Akut toksisite · Vibrio fischeri · Microtox®

Abstract

Acute toxicity test, which takes place among rapid toxicity tests and is conducted through bioluminescent bacteria, has been included in many countries' standards thanks to its test duration, sample volume, cost-efficiency and result sensitivity. Sensitivity of Microtox® Reagent, being one of the commercial kits of bioluminescent bacteria, can be detected via reference toxicants (control). Various reference toxicants (control) are recommended by the manufacturer company to be used in Microtox® acute toxicity test. This study aims to use formaldehyde as alternative reference toxicant (control) in Microtox® acute toxicity test. Acute toxicity of formaldehyde, according to Vibrio fischeri, was investigated on 5, 15 and 30 minutes of inhibition periods. EC50 values were found as 2,30±0,60 mg/l; 2,14±0,63 mg/l and 2,17±0,70 mg/l by inhibition periods, respectively. Standard deviation of EC50 values found for each sample group differed between 0,01-0,47. According to mean acute toxicity results of all formaldehyde inhibition periods, 0,10 unit deviation was found in 5 minutes of results. For 15 and 30 minutes of inhibition periods, mean value of unit deviation was found as 0,06 and 0,04 which showed closer values to each other and the mean value. The investigated toxicants show the performance of pipetting sensitivity of reagent, analyzer and test operator.

Özet

Hızlı toksisite testlerinden; test süresi, numune hacmi, uygun maliyeti ve sonuç hassasiyeti nedeniyle; biyolüminesans bakteri ile yapılan akut toksisite testi, birçok ülke standartlarında yerini almıştır. Biyolüminesans bakterinin ticari bir kiti olan Microtox® Reagent’ın hassasiyeti, referans toksik madde (kontrol) sayesinde tespit edilebilmektedir. Microtox® akut toksisite testinde kullanılmak üzere üretici firma tarafından farklı referans toksik maddeler (kontrol) önerilmektedir. Bu çalışmada, Microtox® akut toksisite testinde kullanılmak üzere formaldehitin alternatif referans toksik madde (kontrol) olarak kullanımı hedeflenmiştir. Formaldehitin Vibrio fischeri’ye göre olan akut toksisitesi, 5, 15 ve 30. dakika inhibisyon sürelerinde çalışılmıştır. İnhibisyon sürelerine göre EC50 değerleri sırasıyla 2,30±0,60 mg/l; 2,14±0,63 mg/l ve 2,17±0,70 mg/l bulunmuştur. Her bir örnekleme grubu için bulunan EC50 değerlerinin, ortalamadan sapmaları ise 0,01-0.47 arasında değişim göstermiştir. Formaldehitin tüm inhibisyon süreleri için ortalama akut toksisite sonucuna bakıldığında da; 5. dakikalık sonuçta 0,10 birim sapma görülmektedir. 15 ve 30 dakikalık inhibisyon süreleri için ise; ortalama sırasıyla 0,06 ve 0,04 birim sapma ile ortalamaya ve birbirlerine daha yakın değerler aldığı tespit edilmiştir. Çalışılan referans toksik maddeler; reagent, analizör ve test operatörünün pipetleme hassasiyetinin performansını göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖNMEZ, V. Z., SİVRİ, N. (2016). Interlaboratory Precision of Acute Toxicity Tests Using Reference Toxicant Formaldehyde. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3, 96–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/773858

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Blaise, C. & Férard, J.F., 2005, Small-scale Freshwater Toxicity Investigations, Springer Netherlands. EPA, 2002,
  2. U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms, 5. Edition, Washington. García-Montaño, J., Domenech, X., García-Hortal, J.A., Torrades, F., & Peral, J., 2008, The testing of several biological and chemical coupled treatments for Cibacron Red FN-R azo dye removal, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 154(1), 484-490.
  3. Gerhardt, A., 2002, Bioindicator species and their use in biomonitoring, Environmental Monitoring I, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Oxford: Eolss Publishers.
  4. Guilhermino, L., Diamantino, T., Silva, M. C., & Soares, A. M. V. M., 2000, Acute toxicity test with Daphnia magna: an alternative to mammals in the prescreening of chemical toxicity?. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 46(3), 357-362.
  5. Harkey, G. A., & Young, T. M., 2000, Effect of soil contaminant extraction method in determining toxicity using the Microtox® assay. Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 19(2), 276-282.
  6. Johnson, B. T., & Long, E. R.,1998, Rapid toxicity assessment of sediments from estuarine ecosystems: A new tandem in vitro testing approach. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 17(6), 1099-1106.
  7. Liu, M. C., Chen, C. M., Cheng, H. Y., Chen, H. Y., Su, Y. C., & Hung, T. Y., 2002, Toxicity of different industrial effluents in Taiwan: a comparison of the sensitivity of Daphnia similis and Microtox®. Environmental toxicology, 17(2), 93-97.
  8. Loibner A.P., Szolar O.H.J., Braun R. & Hirmann D., 2004, Toxicity testing of 16 priority Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons using Lumistox, Environ Toxicol Chem., 31(3), 557-564.
  9. Ma, X.Y., Wang, X.C., Ngo, H.H., Guo, W., Wu, M.N. & Wang, N., 2014, Bioassay based luminescent bacteria: Interferences, improvements, and applications, Science of the Total Environment, 468, 1-11. Microtox® Manual, 1992,
  10. Microbics Corporation, Carlsbad, USA. Parvez, S., Venkataraman, C. & Mukherji, S., 2006, A review on advantages of implementing luminescence inhibition test (Vibrio fischeri) for acute toxicity prediction of chemicals, Environment International, 32(2), 265-268. Paździor, K., Wrębiak, J., Klepacz-Smółka, A., Gmurek, M., Bilińska, L., Kos, L., Sójka-Ledakowicz, J. & Ledakowicz, S., 2016, Influence of ozonation and biodegradation on toxicity of industrial textile wastewater, Jour