Journals / Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Investigation of Possible Toxic Effects of Personal Care Products on Daphnia magna in the Kucukcekmece Lagoon, Marmara Sea (Turkey)

Pages
533–540
Publication Date
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When PCPs including these liquid plastics, which are found to have non-toxicity characteristics, it is obvious that different toxic effects can emerge apart from the individual toxicity on surface waters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Polyethylene glycols (PEGs) used in personal care products (PCPs) are preferred in a wide range of fields thanks to their solubility, viscosity properties, and low toxicity levels which were detected on mammals nearly 60 years ago.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The acute toxicity class of PEGs was identified as non-toxic (Class 0).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When PCPs including these liquid plastics, which are found to have non-toxicity characteristics, it is obvious that different toxic effects can emerge apart from the individual toxicity on surface waters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:personel care products · Polyethylene glycol · surface waters

Abstract

Polyethylene glycols (PEGs) used in personal care products (PCPs) are preferred in a wide range of fields thanks to their solubility, viscosity properties, and low toxicity levels which were detected on mammals nearly 60 years ago. This study was aimed to determine the effect of acute toxicity of personal care products and PEGs which are used particularly in personal care and pharmaceutical products on aquatic ecosystems. In this scope, this study was determined the individual acute toxicities of PEGs; the acute toxicity of baby shampoo and body lotion which are among personal care products containing PEGs; and the possible acute toxicity of these products when they reach the surface waters. Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test was used to determine the toxic effect on aquatic organisms. The acute toxicity class of PEGs was identified as non-toxic (Class 0). While the body lotion was highly toxic (Class 5) at the end of the 48-hour exposure time without being applied to any surface water, it was non-toxic (Class 0) for all stations when applied to surface water. While the baby shampoo was practically non-toxic (Class 1) at the end of the 48-hour exposure time without being applied to any surface water, it was slightly toxic (Class 2) for station 1 and station 2 when applied to surface water. When PCPs including these liquid plastics, which are found to have non-toxicity characteristics, it is obvious that different toxic effects can emerge apart from the individual toxicity on surface waters.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖNMEZ, V. Z., ERCAN, N., SİVRİ, N. (2020). Investigation of Possible Toxic Effects of Personal Care Products on Daphnia magna in the Kucukcekmece Lagoon, Marmara Sea (Turkey). Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 533–540. https://ajindex.com/articles/773613

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Referans 1 Brausch, J.M. & Rand, G.M. (2011). A review of personal care products in the aquatic environment: Environmental concentrations and toxicity. Chemosphere, 82(11), 1518-1532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.018 Referans 2 Cheung, P.K. & Fok, L. (2016). Evidence of microbeads from personal care product contaminating the sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 109(1), 582-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.05.046 Referans 3 CIR Expert Panel (2004). Final report of the amended safety assessment of PEG-5, -10, -16, -25, -30, and -40 soy sterol. International Journal of Toxicology, 23, 23-47. Referans 4 Çetinkaya Karafakı, F. (2018). Impacts of drugs, cosmetics, personal care products on the environment and EU countries and Turkey's perspective. Journal of Disaster and Risk, 1(1), 63-71. (in Turkish). Referans 5 Daughton, C.G. & Ternes, T.A. (1999). Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: Agents of subtle change? Environmental Health Perspectives, 107(6): 907-938. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.99107s6907 Referans 6 Duis, K. & Coors, A. (2016). Microplastics in the aquatic and terrestrial environment: Sources (with a specific focus on personal care products), fate and effects. Environmental Sciences Europe, 28(2):1-25. DOI:10.1186/s12302-015-0069-y Referans 7 EPA (1991).
  2. U.S Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Short Term Methods for Estimating The Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Fresh Organisms, Washington. Referans 8 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) https://www.fda.gov/ (20 August 2019). Referans 9 Fruijtier-Pölloth, C. (2005). Safety assessment on polyethylene glycols (PEGs) and their derivatives as used in cosmetic products. Toxicology, 214, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2005.06.001 Referans 10 GESEAMP https://www.jodc.go.jp/info/ioc_doc/GESAMP/GESAMP64.pdf (6 June 2019). Referans 11 Hernandez, L.M., Yousefi, N. & Tufenkji, N. (2017). Are there nanoplastics in your personal care products? Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 4(7), 280-285. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00187 Referans 12 Imhof, H.K., Rusek, J., Thiel, M., Wolinska, J. & Laforsch, C. (2017). Do microplastic particles affect Daphnia magna at the morphological, life history and molecular level? PloS one, 12(11): e0187590. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187590 Referans 13 Jang, H.J., Shin, C.Y. & Kim, K.B. (2015). Safety evaluation of polyethylene glycol (PEG) compounds for