Journals / İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Do Food Groups Have Effects On The Risk Of Developing Breast Cancer?

Besin Gruplarının Meme Kanseri Gelişme Riski Üzerine Etkileri Var Mıdır?

Pages
339–343
Publication Date
2022-05-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

More research is needed to investigate the effects of these food groups on breast cancer risk.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Compounds commonly formed during cooking in red and processed meats, on the other hand, can increase the risk of breast cancer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:More research is needed to investigate the effects of these food groups on breast cancer risk.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:besin ögeleri · Meme kanseri · beslenme

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women. Breast cancer is caused by a combination of genetic, behavioral, and environmental factors. In this review, it is aimed to examine the relationship between nutrition which is behavioral and enviromental factors and breast cancer risk. Within the scope of nutrition, milk and product, meat and product, vegetables and fruit, cereal, oil food groups is discussed. Calcium and vitamin D, which are found in milk and dairy products, may reduce the risk of breast cancer. Compounds commonly formed during cooking in red and processed meats, on the other hand, can increase the risk of breast cancer. Vegetables and fruits can reduce the risk of breast cancer thanks to their rich vitamin, polyphenol, carotenoid and fiber content. Similarly, phytoestrogens, phenolic acids, antioxidant vitamins and fiber found in the composition of whole grains can reduce the risk of breast cancer. The results of studies examining on dietary fat intake, fatty acids and breast cancer risk differ. More research is needed to investigate the effects of these food groups on breast cancer risk.

Özet

Meme kanseri kadınlarda en sık görülen kanser türüdür. Genetik, davranışsal ve çevresel faktörler meme kanseri etiyolojisinde yer almaktadır. Bu derlemede çevresel ve davranışsal bir faktör olan beslenme kapsamında süt ve süt ürünleri; et ve et ürünleri; sebze ve meyve; tahıl, yağ tüketimi ile meme kanseri riski arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Süt ve süt ürünlerinin bileşiminde bulunan kalsiyum ve D vitamini meme kanseri riskinde koruyucu role sahip olabilir. Ancak kırmızı ve işlenmiş etlerde genellikle pişirme sırasında oluşan bileşikler meme kanseri riskini artırabilir. Sebze ve meyveler ise zengin vitamin, polifenol, karotenoid ve posa içerikleri sayesinde meme kanseri riskini azaltabilir. Benzer şekilde tam tahılların bileşiminde bulunan fitoöstrojenler, fenolik asitler, antioksidan vitaminler ve posa meme kanseri riskini azaltabilir. Diyet yağ alımı ve yağ asitleri ile meme kanseri riskini inceleyen çalışmaların sonuçları ise farklılık göstermektedir. İncelenen bu besin gruplarının meme kanseri riski üzerine etkisinin araştırılması için daha fazla çalışmaya ihtiyaç olduğu düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERSOY, N., YARDIMCI, H. (2022). Do Food Groups Have Effects On The Risk Of Developing Breast Cancer?. İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 339–343. https://ajindex.com/articles/772671

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2021;71(3): 209-49. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660 tuik.gov [Internet]. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu; 2020 [Cited: 2021 August 26]. Available from: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/ Index?p=Olum-ve-Olum-Nedeni-Istatistikleri-2019-33710.
  2. Clinton SK, Giovannucci EL, Hursting SD. The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research third expert report on diet, nutrition, physical activity, and cancer: impact and future directions. The Journal of Nutrition. 2020; 150(4), 663-71. DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxz268 Lof M, Weiderpass E. Impact of diet on breast cancer risk. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 21(1): 80-5. DOI: 10.1097/ GCO.0b013e32831d7f22 De Cicco P, Catani Mv, Gasperi V, Sibilano M, Quaglietta M, Savini I. Nutrition and breast cancer: a literature review on prevention, treatment and recurrence. Nutrients. 2019; 11(7):1514. DOI: 10.3390/ nu11071514 Giles ED, Wellberg EA, Astling DP, Anderson SM, Thor AD, Jindal S, et al. Obesity and overfeeding affecting both tumor and systemic metabolism activates the progesterone receptor to contribute to postmenopausal breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2012; 72(24): 6490-501. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-1653 Hjartåker A, Laake P, Lund E. Childhood and adult milk consumption and risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a cohort of 48,844 women—the Norwegian women and cancer study. Int J Cancer. 2001; 93(6): 888-93. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.1409 Dong JY, Zhang L, He K, Qin LQ. Dairy consumption and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011; 127(1): 23-31. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1467-5
  3. Zang J, Shen M, Du S, Chen T, Zou S. The association between dairy intake and breast cancer in western and Asian populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Breast Cancer. 2015; 18(4): 313- 22. DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2015.18.4.313 Chen P, Hu P, Xİe D, Qın Y, Wang F, Wang H. Meta-analysis of vitamin D, calcium and the prevention of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010; 121(2): 469-77. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0593-9
  4. Kesse-Guyot E, Bertrais S, Duperray B, Arnault N, Bar-Hen A, Galan P, et al. Dairy products, calcium and the risk of breast cancer: results of the French SU. VI. MAX prospective study. Ann Nutr Metab. 2007; 51(2): 139-145. DOI: 10.1159/000103274 H