Journals / Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE NURSES’ ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY SCALE – ACUTE CARE VERSION: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY

Pages
346–362
Publication Date
2022-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Sub-scale KMO values of the scale ranged between 0.775 and 0.948, and the Barlett test result was found p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This is a methodological study that aims to adapt the NAQS-ACV scale to the Turkish context, as well as to test its validity and reliability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted in 1 medical Faculty hospital, 2 public hospitals, and 1 private hospital in a city located in the southern part of Turkey between the 1st of January and 31st of March 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Sub-scale KMO values of the scale ranged between 0.775 and 0.948, and the Barlett test result was found p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Nurse · Care · Quality

Abstract

This is a methodological study that aims to adapt the NAQS-ACV scale to the Turkish context, as well as to test its validity and reliability. The study was conducted in 1 medical Faculty hospital, 2 public hospitals, and 1 private hospital in a city located in the southern part of Turkey between the 1st of January and 31st of March 2016. The study included 427 nurses who worked in the internal diseases, surgery, and obstetric clinics of the related hospitals. Data were collected through the “Nurse Information Form” and “Nurses’ Assessment of Quality Scale – Acute Care Version”. While the validity analysis of the NAQS-ACV included language, scope, and construct analysis, reliability analysis included internal consistency reliability analysis. The 77-item Turkish version of the NAQS-ACV was composed of 3 sections and 8 sub-scales. Sub-scale KMO values of the scale ranged between 0.775 and 0.948, and the Barlett test result was found p

Özet

This is a methodological study that aims to adapt the NAQS-ACV scale to the Turkish context, as well as to test its validity and reliability. The study was conducted in 1 medical Faculty hospital, 2 public hospitals, and 1 private hospital in a city located in the southern part of Turkey between the 1st of January and 31st of March 2016. The study included 427 nurses who worked in the internal diseases, surgery, and obstetric clinics of the related hospitals. Data were collected through the “Nurse Information Form” and “Nurses’ Assessment of Quality Scale – Acute Care Version”. While the validity analysis of the NAQS-ACV included language, scope, and construct analysis, reliability analysis included internal consistency reliability analysis. The 77-item Turkish version of the NAQS-ACV was composed of 3 sections and 8 sub-scales. Sub-scale KMO values of the scale ranged between 0.775 and 0.948, and the Barlett test result was found p

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBAŞ, M., AKÇA, E. İ., KÖROĞLU, C. O., SÜRÜCÜ, Ş. G. (2022). VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE NURSES’ ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY SCALE – ACUTE CARE VERSION: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY. Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 346–362. https://ajindex.com/articles/769889

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akbas, M. (2019). Patient satisfaction on nursing care: the case of gynecology and obstetrics clinics. Acta bioethica, 25(1), 127-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2019000100127
  2. Alpar, C. (2016). Applied statistics and validity and reliability with examples from sports, health and education sciences. Ankara:
  3. Detail Publishing. Blasdell, N.D. (2017). The meaning of caring in nursing practice. Int J Nurs Clin Pract, 4(238), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2017/238
  4. Burhans, L.M., & Alligood, M.R. (2010). Quality nursing care in the words of nurses. Journal of advanced nursing, 66(8), 1689-1697.
  5. Capık, C. (2016). Use of confıdentıal factor analysıs ın valıdıty and relıabılıty studıes. Anatolian Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, 17(3):196-205. Celik H. E., & Yilmaz V (2016). Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd Ed. Ankara, Turkey: Anı Publishing, 23-51.
  6. Church, C.D. (2016). Defining competence in nursing and its relevance to quality care. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 32(5), E9-E14. doi: 10.1097/NND.0000000000000289 Costello, M. (2017). Nurses’ Self-Identified Characteristics and Behaviors Contributing to Patients’ Positive Perceptions of Their Nursing Care: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 35(1), 62-66. 10.1177/0898010116643835 Gul, S. (2019). Nursıng care ın the lıght of care concept and affectıng factors. ACU Sağlık Bil Derg, 10(2), 129-134. https://doi.org/10.31067/0.2019.134
  7. Karaca, A., & Durna, Z. (2018). Nursing Care Quality and Associated Factors. Health and Society, 28(3), 16-23.
  8. Kol, E., Geckil, E., Arıkan, C., Ilter, M., Ozcan, O., Sakırgun, E.,. & Uslular, E. (2017). Investigation of nursing care perception in Turkey. Acibadem University Journal of Health Sciences, 8, 163-72.
  9. Koy, V., Yunibhand, J., Angsuroch, Y., & Fisher, M.L. (2015). Relationship between nursing care quality, nurse staffing, nurse job satisfaction, nurse practice environment, and burnout: literature review. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 3(8), 1825-1831. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20150288
  10. Lynn, M.R., McMillen, B.J., & Sidani, S. (2007). Including the provider in the assessment of quality care: development and testing of the Nurses' assessment of quality scale—acute care version. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 22(4), 328-336. doi: 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000290414.42640.c0 Molina-Mula, J., & Gallo-Estrada, J. (2020). Impact of nurse-patient relationship on quality of care and patient au