Journals / International Review of Economics and Management / 2015 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

CONSUMERS RESPONSE TO INTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC CUES OF OLIVE OIL: A QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

ZEYTİNYAĞININ İÇSEL VE DIŞSAL İŞARETLERİNE TÜKETİCİLERİN TEPKİSİ: NİCEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Pages
61–84
Publication Date
2016-01-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study contributes both academic literature and practitioners by determining the consumer response to the cues of olive oil.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Olive oil becomes agenda more with the development of health-consciousness in consumers in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The findings of the research demonstrate that the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic cues are significant on attitude, image and consumers’ willingness to pay premium.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study contributes both academic literature and practitioners by determining the consumer response to the cues of olive oil.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Zeytinyağı · Tutum · İmaj

Abstract

Olive oil becomes agenda more with the development of health-consciousness in consumers in recent years. Olive oil as juice of olive fruit is healthy and complex with inherent specific attributes, and much more expensive than its competitors. Olive oil adds value to consumers with its intrinsic cues such as taste, smell, color and extrinsic cues such as brand, type, region of origin, packaging. This study investigates the effect of twelve different intrinsic and extrinsic cues associated with the olive oil on attitude toward product, product image and consumers’ willingness to pay premium. The data of the research model were collected by a questionnaire from olive oil consumers selected by convenience sampling method with face to face interview, and analyzed with Smart Partial Least Squares (PLS) structural equation modeling. The findings of the research demonstrate that the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic cues are significant on attitude, image and consumers’ willingness to pay premium. This study contributes both academic literature and practitioners by determining the consumer response to the cues of olive oil.

Özet

Tüketicilerde sağlık bilincinin gelişmesiyle birlikte zeytinyağı son yıllarda daha fazla gündeme gelmektedir. Zeytin meyvesinin suyu olan zeytinyağı sağlıklı olmakla birlikte kendine özgü özelliklere sahip, kompleks ve rakiplerine göre çok daha pahalı bir yağdır. Zeytinyağı tat, koku, renk gibi içsel ve marka, tip, menşei bölge, ambalaj gibi dışsal işaretlerle tüketicilerde değer oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışma zeytinyağı ile ilişkili tanımlanan on iki farklı işaretin ürüne yönelik tutuma, ürün imajına ve tüketicilerin daha fazla ödeme isteğine etkisini araştırmaktadır. Araştırma modelinin verileri kolayda örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilen zeytinyağı tüketicileriyle yapılan yüz yüze anketle elde edilmiş ve Smart En Küçük Kısmi Kareler (PLS) yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın bulguları içsel ve dışsal işaretlerin tutum, imaj ve daha fazla ödeme isteğinde etkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Çalışma zeytinyağı işaretlerine tüketicilerin tepkisini belirleyerek hem akademik literatüre hem de uygulayıcılara katkı sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOKLU, İ. T., TOKLU, A. T. (2016). CONSUMERS RESPONSE TO INTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC CUES OF OLIVE OIL: A QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH. International Review of Economics and Management, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 61–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/769729

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. AA, 2015 http://aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/zeytinyagi-tuketimi-katlandi/59582 (Erişim 18.12.2015)
  2. Aaker, D.A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, The Free Press, New York (Aktaran, Woon, L.S., 2011)
  3. Aaker, D.A. ve Keller, K.L. (1990). “Consumer evaluations of brand extensions”, Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27-41.
  4. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. ve Yıldırım, E. (2010). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri SPSS Uygulamalı, 6. Baskı,
  5. Sakarya Yayıncılık, Sakarya, 266. Anderson, N.H. (1981). Foundations of Information Integration Theory, The Academic Press,
  6. New York. Anselmsson, J., Bondesson, N.V. ve Johansson, U. (2014). “Brand image and customers’ willingness to pay a price premium for food brands”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 23 (2), 90-102.
  7. Anselmsson, J., Johansson, U. ve Persson, N. (2007). “Understanding price premium for grocery products: a conceptual model of customer-based brand equity”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 16 (6), 401-414.
  8. Bagozzi, R. P. ve Yi, Y. (1988). “On the evaluation of structural equation models”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
  9. Baker, D.A. ve Crompton, J.L. (2000). “Quality, Satisfaction And Behavioral Intentions”, Annals Of Tourism Research, 27 (3), 785-804.
  10. Baker, D.A. ve Crompton, J.L. (2000). “Quality, Satisfaction And Behavioral Intentions”, Annals Of Tourism Research, 27 (3), 785-804.
  11. Bendini, A., Cerretani, L., Carrasco-Pancorbo, A., Gomez-Caravaca, A. M., Segura-Carretero, A., Fernandez-Gutierrez, A. (2007). “Phenolic molecules in virgin olive oils: A survey of their sensory properties, health effects, antioxidant activity and analytical methods. An overview of the last decade”, Molecules, 12(8), 1679-1719.
  12. Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F.E. ve Marchetti, B. (2012). “Development and test of a new fuzzy-QFD approach for characterizing customers rating of extra virgin olive oil”, Food Quality and Preference, 24, 75-84.
  13. Biel, A.L. (1992). “How brand image drives brand equity”, Journal of Advertising Research, Nov/Dec, 9. Caporale, G., Policastro, S., Carlucci, A. ve Monteleone, E. (2006). “Consumer expectations for sensory properties in virgin olive oils”, Food Quality and Preference, 17, 116-125.
  14. Chin, W., (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher,
  15. Mahwah, New Jersey, 295-336.
  16. Collange, V. (2008). “