Journals / International Review of Economics and Management / 2015 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

THE DETERMINATION OF THE EFFECT ON BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS OF THE HEDONIC AND UTILITARIAN CONSUMPTION TENDENCIES IN THE THERMAL TOURISM BUSINESS

TERMAL TURİZM İŞLETMELERİNDE HEDONİK VE FAYDACI TÜKETİM EĞİLİMİNİN DAVRANIŞSAL NİYETLER ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Pages
123–142
Publication Date
2016-01-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the study showed that some dimensions of the hedonic and utilitarian consumption has significant and positive effects on behavioral intentions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine whether there is an effect of the hedonic and utilitarion consumption tendencies on behavioral intentions in the thermal tourism business.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A model, which is composed of hedonic consumption, utilitarian connsumption and behavioral intentions (recommend and revisiting) variables, was structured to achieve the aim of the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the study showed that some dimensions of the hedonic and utilitarian consumption has significant and positive effects on behavioral intentions.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hedonik Tüketim · Faydacı Tüketim · Davranışsal Niyetler

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine whether there is an effect of the hedonic and utilitarion consumption tendencies on behavioral intentions in the thermal tourism business. A model, which is composed of hedonic consumption, utilitarian connsumption and behavioral intentions (recommend and revisiting) variables, was structured to achieve the aim of the study. The research was conducted in the thermal tourism business in Balikesir. Sample of the study determined with convenience sampling and data was collected from consumers of these businesses by using face to face survey method. The regression analysis was used to test the hypotheses regarding the model. The results of the study showed that some dimensions of the hedonic and utilitarian consumption has significant and positive effects on behavioral intentions.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, termal turizm işletmelerinde hedonik ve faydacı tüketim eğiliminin davranışsal niyetler üzerindeki etkisini tespit etmektir. Çalışmanın amacına ulaşmak için hedonik ve faydacı tüketim ile davranışsal niyetler (başkasına önerme ve yeniden ziyaret etme) değişkenleri kullanılarak bir model oluşturulmuştur. Araştırma Balıkesir ilinde faaliyet gösteren termal turizm işletmelerinde yapılmıştır. Bu işletmelerden hizmet alan ve kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen 550 kişi ile yüz yüze görüşülerek veriler elde edilmiştir. Modele ilişkin hipotezleri test etmek için regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Yapılan istatistiksel analizler sonucunda, hedonik tüketim ile faydacı tüketim değişkenlerinin bazı boyutlarının davranışsal niyetler üzerinde anlamlı ve pozitif bir etkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bazı boyutların ise davranışsal niyetler üzerinde herhangi bir anlamlı ve pozitif etkisinin olmadığı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKILIÇ, M. E., ÇETİNTAŞ, H. (2016). THE DETERMINATION OF THE EFFECT ON BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS OF THE HEDONIC AND UTILITARIAN CONSUMPTION TENDENCIES IN THE THERMAL TOURISM BUSINESS. International Review of Economics and Management, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 123–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/769724

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Ahtola, O. T. 1985. Hedonic And Utilitarian Aspects Of Consumer Behavior: An Attitudinal perspective. Advances In Consumer Research, 12, 7-10.
  2. Alegre, J., Cladera, M., & Sard, M. 2013. Tourist Areas: Examining the effects of location attributes on tour operator package holiday prices. Tourism Management, 38, 131-141.
  3. Altunışık, R., Özdemir, Ş., & Torlak, Ö. 2002. Modern Pazarlama. İstanbul:
  4. Değişim Yayınları.
  5. Arnold, M. J. & Reynolds, K. E. 2003. Hedonic Shopping Motivations. Journal Of Retailing, 79, 77-95.
  6. Arnold, M.J. & Reynolds, K. E. 2012. Approach And Avoidance Motivation: Investigating Hedonic Consumption İn A Retail Setting. Journal Of Retailing, 88(3), 399-411.
  7. Anderson, D. E. 2010. Hotel Attributes And Hedonic Prices: An Analysis Of İnternet- Based Transactions İn Singapore's Market For Hotel Rooms.Ann Reg Sci, 44, 229-240.
  8. Anton C., Camarero C., & Rodriguez J. 2013.
  9. Usefulness, Enjoyment, And Self-Image Congruence: The Adoption Of E-Book Readers. Psychology And Marketing, 30(4), 372-384.
  10. Babin, B. J., Darden, W.R., & Griffin, M. 1994. Work And/Or Fun:Measuring Hedonic And Utilitarian Shopping Value. Journal Of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644656. Bitner, M., Booms, B., & Mohr, L. 1994. Critical Service Encounters: The Employee’s Viewpoint. Journal Of Marketing, 58(4), 95-106.
  11. Carpenter, J. M., Moore, M. & Fairhurst, A. E. 2005. Consumer Shopping Value For Retail Brands. Journal Of Fashion Marketing And Management, 9(1), 43-53. Carpenter J. M. & Moore M. 2009. Utilitarian And Hedonic Shopping Value in The US Discount Sector. Journal Of Retailing And Consumer Services, 16, 68-74.
  12. Chen, C. F. 2008. Investigating Structural Relationships Between Service Quality, Perceived Value, Satisfaction, And Behavioral İntentions For Air Passengers: Evidence From Taiwan. Transportation Research Part A: Policy And Practice, 42(4), 709-717.
  13. Chen, C. F. & Chen, F. S. 2010.
  14. Experience Quality, Perceived Value, Satisfaction And Behavioral İntentions For Heritage Tourists. Tourism Management, 31(1), 29-35.
  15. Cheng, T-M. & Lu,C-C. 2013.
  16. Destination Image, Novelty, Hedonics, Perceived Value, And Revisiting Behavioral Intention For Island Tourism. Asia Pacific Journal Of Tourism Research. 8(7), 766-783.
  17. Childersa, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S.2001. Hedonic And Utilitarian Motivations For Online Retail Shopping Behavior. Journal Of Retailing, 77, 511- 535. Danaher, P. J. (1997). Using conjoint analysis to determine the relative importance of service attributes