Journals / International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Design Thinking Model in Early Childhood Education

Pages
196–210
Publication Date
2022-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The analysis results demonstrated that the design thinking model could be easily used in the education of pre-school children.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate the usability of the design thinking model for the education of pre-school children and the effects of the activities performed in line with the design thinking model on children.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This research was conducted as a case study of 16 teachers working in a private school.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The analysis results demonstrated that the design thinking model could be easily used in the education of pre-school children.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Early childhood education · pre-school education · design thinking model

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the usability of the design thinking model for the education of pre-school children and the effects of the activities performed in line with the design thinking model on children. This research was conducted as a case study of 16 teachers working in a private school. Research data were collected through interviews with teachers and analyzed using the content analysis method. The analysis results demonstrated that the design thinking model could be easily used in the education of pre-school children. The Design Thinking model improves children's creativity, problem-solving, cooperation, communication, curiosity, questioning, and empathy. It allows children to express their ideas freely and supports social, emotional, language, and cognitive developmental domains. Also, the design-oriented learning process appears to actively involve children in the learning process, enable peer learning, and give children self-confidence. On the other hand, while the design thinking model does not seem to be a problem for children aged 4 and 5, children aged 3 have issues in task sharing, being a group, belonging to a group, fulfilling duties and responsibilities. or tap here to enter text.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇIN, V. (2022). Design Thinking Model in Early Childhood Education. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 196–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/768085

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Atkinson, R. L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., Bem, D. J., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2010). Hilgard’s ıntroduction to psychology (Psikolojiye giriş), (6. Baskı), Çev. Yavuz Alogan, Arkadaş. Baltacı, A. (2017). Nitel veri analizinde Miles-Huberman modeli. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(1), 1-15.
  2. Baltacı, A. (2019). Nitel araştırma süreci: Nitel bir araştırma nasıl yapılır?. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 368-388.
  3. Boeree, C. G. (2006). Abraham Maslow. Personality Theories (p.1-11).
  4. Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., Royalty, A., & Hornstein, M. (2010). Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(1), 37-53.
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Araştırma deseni; Nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları (S. B. Demir, Çev. Ed.). Eğiten. Dam, R. & Siang, T. (2018a). What is design Thinking and Why Is It So Popular? https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/what-is-design-thinking-and-why-is-it-so-popular. (Erişim Tarihi: 02.01.2021)
  6. Dam, R. &Siang, T. (2018b). Stages in the design thinking process. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process. (Erişim Tarihi:12.01.2021)
  7. Demirel, Ö. (2008). Yapılandırmacı eğitim. Eğitim ve Öğretimde ÇağdaşYaklaşımlar Sempozyumu, 03-04 Nisan 2008. İstanbul:
  8. Harp Akademileri Basımevi. Doppelt, Y.,Mehalik, M. M., Schunn, C. D., Silk, E. &Krysinski, D. (2008). Engagement and achievements: A casestudy of design-based learning in a science context. Journal of TechnologyEducation, 19(2), 22-39.
  9. Dorie, B. L. C ardella, M. and Svarovsky, G. N. (2014). Capturing the design thinking of young children ınteracting with a parent. School of Engineering Education Graduate Student Series. Paper 52. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/enegs/52
  10. Ecke, Y. V., Chope, R. C. & Emmelkaamp, P. M. (2006). Bowlby and Bowen: Attachment theory. Counselling and Clinical Psychology Journal, 3(2).81-108
  11. Ellefson, M. R.,Brinker, R. A., Vernacchio, V. J. &Schunn, C. D. (2008). Design-based learning for biology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 36(4), 292-298.
  12. Ercan, S. (2014). Fen eğitiminde mühendislik uygulamalarının kullanımı: tasarım temelli fen eğitimi (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi,İstanbul.
  13. Erden, Ş. & Yalçın, V. (2021). Probleme dayalı öğrenme yaklaşımına göre hazırlanan okul öncesi STEM etkinliklerinin çocukların pr