Journals / International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Fresh Ear Yield And Quality Performance In Super Sweet Corn

Pages
80–94
Publication Date
2019-08-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that sweet corn genotype are significantly different in terms of yield and quality characteristics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim of this study is determine to fresh ear yield and quality characters of sweet corn varieties which Vega, Challenger, Sentinel, HYRIX 39, and HYRIX 53 in two location in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The experiment was caried out evaluate the yield and quality performance of some sweet corn genotypes as well as demonstrate unfamiliar supersweet corn concept in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that sweet corn genotype are significantly different in terms of yield and quality characteristics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:fresh ear yield · grain yield · quality and cob length

Abstract

Aim of this study is determine to fresh ear yield and quality characters of sweet corn varieties which Vega, Challenger, Sentinel, HYRIX 39, and HYRIX 53 in two location in Turkey. The research was conducted on randomised blocks design with four replication in Bafra and Tekkekoy location. The experiment was caried out evaluate the yield and quality performance of some sweet corn genotypes as well as demonstrate unfamiliar supersweet corn concept in Turkey. In the research were obserwed some yield component and quality characters such as flowering time, plant length, first cob length, grain yield, cob diameter, cob length, number of rows in the cob, amount of grains in row, number of marketable cobs per plant, wet cob harvest time, wet cob yield, grain cob ratio, grain moisture, dry grain yield. It was found that sweet corn genotype are significantly different in terms of yield and quality characteristics. The highest wet cob yield was 24.238 t ha-1 in Hybrix 39 super sweet. Super sweet corn has an important potential in sweet corn cultivation due to high yield of dry grains and its high maintenance rate of sugar raito in the long term after harvesting. Statistical analysis showed that the effect of genotype and the environment, as well as their interactions, had a significant impact on the yield of sweet corn hybrids. The presented results have demonstrated the poerformance of some sweet corn in Turkey. This work is intended to inspire similar studies using other sweet corn varieties and also to encourage the wide-scale production sweet corn in Turkey.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZATA, E. (2019). Evaluation of Fresh Ear Yield And Quality Performance In Super Sweet Corn. International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 80–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/767694

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. SZYMANEK M (2012). Processing of sweet corn, trends in vital food and control engineering. Ayman Amer Eissa (Ed.). InTech. Available at http://www.intechopen.com/books/trends-invital- food-and-control engineering/processing-of-sweet-corn. Accessed in May 22, 2013
  2. JUNPATİW, A., LERTRAT, K., LOMTHAİSONG, K. AND TANGWONGCHAİ, R. 2013. Effects of steaming, boiling and frozen storage on carotenoid contents of various sweet corn cultivars International Food Research Journal 20(5): 2219-2225
  3. FAO, 2016a. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Crop productıon of maizereen. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC Date Accessed:15.04.2019 4.SALUNKHE, D. K. – KADAM, S.S. 1998. Sweet corn. Handbook of vegetable science and technology, production, composition, storage and processing. New York: Marcel Dekker, 742 p. ISBN 0-8247-0105-4
  4. SINGH, I. – LANGYAN, S. – YADAVA, P. 2014. Sweet Corn and Corn-Based Sweeteners. In Sugar Technology, vol. 16, 2014, no. 2, p. 144– 149. ISSN 0972-1525
  5. FAO, 2016b. Turkey ımport and export sweet corn frozen and sweet corn prep or preserved. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/TP Date Accessed:15.04.2019 7.KIRTOK, Y, (1998). Mısır Üretimi ve Kullanımı. Kocaoluk yayınevi, İstanbul. 8.ANONYMOUS 2018. Tarımsal değerleri ölçme denemeleri teknik talimatı-Mısır. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/BUGEM/TTSM/Belgeler/Tescil/Teknik%20Talimatlar/S%C4%B1cak%20%C4%B0klim%20Tah%C4%B1llar%C4%B1/MISIR_TEKNIK_TALIMATI.pdf 9.DÜZGÜNEŞ, O., T.KESİCİ, O.KAVUNCU VE F.GÜRBÜZ. 1987. Araştırma ve Deneme Metotları (İstatistik Metotları II). Ankara Üniv. Zir. Fak.Yay.: 1021, Ders Kit.: 285, Ankara, 381 s. 10.TURGUT, İ. VE BALCI, A., 2002. Bursa Koşullarında Değişik Ekim Zamanlarının Şeker Mısırı (Zea mays L. var. Saccharata Sturt.) Çeşitlerinin Taze koçan Verimi ile Verim Öğeleri Üzerine Etkileri. Uludağ Üniv. Zir. Fak. Derg. 16(2):79-91. 11.ÖKTEM, A. VE ÖKTEM, G.A., 2006. Bazı Şeker Mısır Genotiplerinin (Zea mays L. var. saccharata Sturt) Harran Ovası Koşullarında Verim Karakteristiklerinin Belirlenmesi. Uludağ Üniv. Zir. Fak. Derg., 20(1):33-46. 12.EGESEL, C.Ö., TURHAN, H., KAHRIMAN, F. VE ÖZKAN, P., 2007. Bazı Şeker Mısır (Zea mays L. var. Saccharata Sturt.) Genotiplerinin Verim ve Bitkisel Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi. Türkiye VII. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi. 25-27 Haziran 2007. Erzurum. s:206- 209. 13.SÖNMEZ, K., ALAN, Ö., KINACI, E., KINACI, G., KUTLU, İ., BUDAK, Z. VE EVRENOSOĞLU, Y., 2013. Bazı Şeker Mısır Çeşitlerinin (Zea mays s