SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Educational Research Review / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Analysis on Entrepreneurial Intentions and Motivation and Learning Strategies of University Students

Nihan SÖLPÜK TURHAN
Pages
159–164
Publication Date
2020-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that motivation and learning strategies would differ according to the year of study level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of the study is to carry out a research on whether “entrepreneurial intentions” and “motivation and learning strategies” of university students could be predicted according to their year of study levels.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The first sub-purpose of the research is to determine whether there is a relationship between entrepreneurial intentions and their motivation and learning strategies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that motivation and learning strategies would differ according to the year of study level.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Entrepreneurial Intentions · motivation and learning strategies · university students

Abstract

The main purpose of the study is to carry out a research on whether “entrepreneurial intentions” and “motivation and learning strategies” of university students could be predicted according to their year of study levels. The first sub-purpose of the research is to determine whether there is a relationship between entrepreneurial intentions and their motivation and learning strategies. The second sub-purpose is to analyze whether there is a difference between entrepreneurial intentions and their motivation and learning strategies according to their year of study levels. The method of this study is quantitative, and it has been designed in the survey approach. The 'Entrepreneurship Scale for University Students' developed by Yılmaz and Sümbül (2009) was used as the data collection tool. Another scale used in the study was the "Motivation and Learning Strategies Scale", which was adapted to Turkish by Büyüköztürk, Akgün, Özkahveci et al. (2004). For the analysis of the data, multinomial logistic regression analysis, Pearson correlation analysis and one way variance analysis (ANOVA) were performed. According to the research findings, it was revealed that entrepreneurial intentions of university students and their motivation and learning strategies were predicted by their year of study levels at a low level. A weak positive correlation was obtained between entrepreneurial intentions and their motivation and learning strategies. It was concluded that motivation and learning strategies would differ according to the year of study level.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURHAN, N. S. (2020). Analysis on Entrepreneurial Intentions and Motivation and Learning Strategies of University Students. International Journal of Educational Research Review, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 159–164. https://ajindex.com/articles/766280

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Bandura, A. (1986). The social foundations, of thought and actions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Brophy, J. (1987). On motivating students. In D. Berliner & B. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to teachers (pp. 201–245). New York: Random House. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Kahveci, Ö., & Demirel, F. (2004). Güdülenme ve öğrenme stratejileri ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 4(2), 207-239.
  2. Cohen, A., & Dörnyei. Z. (2002). Focus on the language learner: Motivation, styles and strategies. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp.170-190).
  3. London, UK: Edward Arnold. Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., Büyüköztürk, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2008). İlköğretim ikinci kademe ve lise öğrencilerinin ders ve sınıf düzeylerine göre öğrenme stratejileri ve güdülenme düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), 1-27.
  4. Damar, A. (2015). Girişimci kişilik özelliklerinin öğrencilerin girişimcilik eğilimlerine etkisi: Sannio Üniversitesi ve Selçuk Üniversitesi'nde karşılaştırmalı bir araştırma. Doctoral dissertation, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589-630). Oxford: Blackwell. Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill. Frymier, A. B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42(2), 133-144.
  5. Henry, C., Hill, F., & Leitch, C. (2005). Entrepreneurship education and training: Can entrepreneurship be taught? part I. Education Training, 47(2), 98-111.
  6. Honig, B. (2001). Learning strategies and resources for entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(1), 21-35.
  7. Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current studies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Keller, K. L. (2000). Manager’s tool kit: The brand report card.Harvard Business Review, 78(1) Kozubíková, L., Dvorský, J., Cepel, M., Balcerzak, A. P. (2017). Important characteristics of an entrepreneur in relation to risk taking: Czech republic case study. Journal of International Studies, 10(3), 220-23.
  8. Ozaralli, N., Rivenburgh, N. K. (2016). Entrepreneurial intention: Antecedents to entrepreneurial behavior in t