SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

A META-ANALYSIS STUDY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MATHEMATICAL LITERACY AND MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT IN PISA TESTS

Nihan SÖLPÜK TURHAN
Murat POLAT
Journal
IOJET
Pages
661–676
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the results of this meta-analysis revealed that there was a positive and moderate relationship among students’ mathematical literacy and mathematics achievement measured in PISA tests.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research is an extensive meta-analysis investigating the link between mathematical literacy and mathematics achievement which are tested mainly in PISA exams.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With this aim in mind, first, the studies related to the research objective between the years 2003-2021 were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the results of this meta-analysis revealed that there was a positive and moderate relationship among students’ mathematical literacy and mathematics achievement measured in PISA tests.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2003-2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This research is an extensive meta-analysis investigating the link between mathematical literacy and mathematics achievement which are tested mainly in PISA exams. With this aim in mind, first, the studies related to the research objective between the years 2003-2021 were examined. In the second stage, eight studies which met the research criteria and 13 quantitative data categories that were common in those studies were determined. In the end of the process, the data set of this meta-analysis study consisted data obtained from 34146 participants in total. Based on the findings driven from the study, a heterogeneous data structure was observed; thus, the Random Effect model was used in the analyses and it was summoned that the link between mathematical literacy and mathematics achievement had a moderately significant effect on the effect size value (Cohen’s d value: 0.66). The analysis of the subgroups revealed that there was no noteworthy difference between the effect levels considering the independent variables including the publication type, sample group and publication year. Finally, the results of this meta-analysis revealed that there was a positive and moderate relationship among students’ mathematical literacy and mathematics achievement measured in PISA tests.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURHAN, N. S., POLAT, M. (2022). A META-ANALYSIS STUDY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MATHEMATICAL LITERACY AND MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT IN PISA TESTS. IOJET, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 661–676. https://ajindex.com/articles/542135

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Açıkel, C. (2009). Meta analiz ve tıptaki yeri. Klinik Psikofarmoloji Bülteni, 19(2), 164-172.
  2. Akyüz, G., & Pala, N. M. (2010). PISA 2003 sonuçlarına göre öğrenci ve sınıf özelliklerinin matematik okuryazarlığına ve problem çözmeye etkisi. İlköğretim Online, 9(2), 668-678.
  3. Baloğlu, M. (2010). An Investigation of the Validity and Reliability of the Adapted Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale-Short Version (mars-sv) among Turkish Students. European Journal of Psychological Education, 25, 507-518.
  4. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. UK: Wiley. Breakspear, S. (2012). The Policy Impact of PISA: An Exploration of the Normative Effects of International Benchmarking in School System Performance. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 71, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9fdfqffr28- en. Chen, H.Y., Thompson, M. S., Kromrey, J. D., & Chang, G. H. (2011). Relations of student perceptions of teacher oral feedback with teacher expectancies and student self-concept. The Journal of Experimental Education, 79(4), 452-477.
  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, Erlbaum. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. Routledge. Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Russell Sage Publication. Çolak, S. K. (2006). Materyal kullanımının altıncı sınıf öğrencilerinin geometri kavramları bağlamında matematiksel okuryazarlığına etkisi üzerine deneysel bir çalışma. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Gazi University, Ankara.
  6. Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2011). Attitude towards mathematics: A bridge between beliefs and emotions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(4), 471-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0309-6
  7. Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes. Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research result. New York: Cambridge University Press. Fernández-Alonso, R., Álvarez-Díaz, M., García-Crespo, F. J., Woitschach, P., & Muñiz, J. (2022). Should we Help our Children with Homework? A Meta-Analysis Using PISA Data. Psicothema, 34(1), 56-65.
  8. Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507-537.
  9. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics ed