Journals / International Journal of Current Approaches in Language, Education and Social Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WRITING SENSITIVITY AND WRITING ACHIEVEMENT // YAZMA DUYARLILIĞI İLE YAZMA BAŞARISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Pages
222–243
Publication Date
2021-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can be argued that writing sensitivity and writing achievement significantly differ according to gender, while writing sensitivity does not significantly differ based on year, writing achievement does.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to reveal the relationship between primary school teacher candidates’ writing sensitivity and writing achievement.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This quantitative study conducted with the relational survey model consisted of 575 teacher candidates of two public universities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can be argued that writing sensitivity and writing achievement significantly differ according to gender, while writing sensitivity does not significantly differ based on year, writing achievement does.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:writing sensitivity · writing achievement · primary school teacher candidates

Abstract

This study aimed to reveal the relationship between primary school teacher candidates’ writing sensitivity and writing achievement. This quantitative study conducted with the relational survey model consisted of 575 teacher candidates of two public universities. The data about primary school teacher candidates’ writing achievement were collected via Rubric for Written Texts (RWT) with the help of written texts produced by them and the Writing Sensitivity Scale (WSS). According to the findings obtained, primary school teacher candidates had moderate writing sensitivity and writing achievement and there was a statistically significant relationship between writing sensitivity and writing achievement. It can be argued that writing sensitivity and writing achievement significantly differ according to gender, while writing sensitivity does not significantly differ based on year, writing achievement does.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKAYA, O., CANBULAT, A. N. K. (2021). INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WRITING SENSITIVITY AND WRITING ACHIEVEMENT // YAZMA DUYARLILIĞI İLE YAZMA BAŞARISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN İNCELENMESİ. International Journal of Current Approaches in Language, Education and Social Sciences, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 222–243. https://ajindex.com/articles/765901

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Bayat, N., & Şekercioğlu, G. (2014). Defining the psychometric properties of the writing sensitivity scale and analysing writing sensitivity with regard to different variables. International Journal of Language Academy, 2 (3), 283-301. https://bit.ly/3z52L9A
  2. Baysal, Z. N., Ayvaz, A., Çekirdekçi, S., & Malbeleği, F. (2013). An analysis of metacognitive awareness of pre-service elementary classroom teachers in terms of various variables. MÜ Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 37, 68-81. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/maruaebd/issue/386/2556
  3. Büyüköztürk, Ş (2006). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni, SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum. Pegem Yayıncılık. Cavkaytar, S. (2010). Benefitting from writing process method to improve written expressıon skills in primary education. Journal of International Social Research, 3(10), 133-139. https://bit.ly/3ep78ma
  4. Ceran, D. (2013). Turkish teachers’ attitudes towards the evaluation of writing training course. Electronic Turkish Studies, 8(1), 1151-1169. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.4187
  5. Dunsmuir, S., Kyriacou, M., Batuwitage, S., Hinson, E., Ingram, V., & O'Sullivan, S. (2015). An evaluation of the Writing Assessment Measure (WAM) for children's narrative writing. Assessing Writing, 23, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2014.08.001
  6. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
  7. Güneş, F. (2014). Türkçe öğretimi yaklaşımlar ve modeller. Ankara:
  8. Pegem Academy Publishing. Huot, B. (2003). Rearticulating writing assessment for teaching and learning. University Press of Colorado. Karasar, N. (2011). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Nobel Yayınları.
  9. Kaya, B., & Ateş, S. (2016). The effect of process-based writing focused on metacognitive skills-oriented to fourth grade students’ narrative writing skill. Education and Science, 41(187), 137-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.6752
  10. Kellog, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective journal of writing research. Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University. Kutlu, Ö., Doğan, C.D., & Karakaya, İ. (2010). Determining student success. (3rd Ed.). Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing. Kutluca Canbulat, A.N. (2020). Adaptation of writing feedback scale to Turkish. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching. 8(1), 20-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ijlet.4176